0.916666666666.....Well, when you answer that, how much is Infinity +1?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCu_BNNI5x4I'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ces%C3%A0ro_summationI'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
Interesting. Thanks.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCu_BNNI5x4I'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
English Martin Short has a pointhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCu_BNNI5x4I'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
Weird because usually not much confuses you.I'm not into advanced math
Disagree because in the first sum, he simply averaged the two possible outcomes and took the average as the answer. That average will never be the answer--the answer will either be 0 or 1; not 0.5.
For that reason, his proof is flawed and I am out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesàro_summationI'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
I don't need a math degree to know that this doesn't make sense and is wrong. It's simply a way for the math nerds to justify an incorrect position.Disagree because in the first sum, he simply averaged the two possible outcomes and took the average as the answer. That average will never be the answer--the answer will either be 0 or 1; not 0.5.
For that reason, his proof is flawed and I am out.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesàro_summationI'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
The sum is never 0 or 1, so how can either of those be the right answer?I don't need a math degree to know that this doesn't make sense and is wrong. It's simply a way for the math nerds to justify an incorrect position.
The sum is always 0 or 1; it's never 0.5.
watThe sum is never 0 or 1, so how can either of those be the right answer?I don't need a math degree to know that this doesn't make sense and is wrong. It's simply a way for the math nerds to justify an incorrect position.
The sum is always 0 or 1; it's never 0.5.
The sum of a finite series of alternating 1s and -1s can be either 0 or 1, depending on how many terms are in the series. But this thread isn't about finite series of integers.watThe sum is never 0 or 1, so how can either of those be the right answer?I don't need a math degree to know that this doesn't make sense and is wrong. It's simply a way for the math nerds to justify an incorrect position.
The sum is always 0 or 1; it's never 0.5.
The average human being has one boob and one ball. Only there isn't any such thing; or at least, outside a freak show.I don't need a math degree to know that this doesn't make sense and is wrong. It's simply a way for the math nerds to justify an incorrect position.Disagree because in the first sum, he simply averaged the two possible outcomes and took the average as the answer. That average will never be the answer--the answer will either be 0 or 1; not 0.5.
For that reason, his proof is flawed and I am out.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesàro_summationI'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
The sum is always 0 or 1; it's never 0.5.
veryThe average human being has one boob and one ball. Only there isn't any such thing; or at least, outside a freak show.I don't need a math degree to know that this doesn't make sense and is wrong. It's simply a way for the math nerds to justify an incorrect position.Disagree because in the first sum, he simply averaged the two possible outcomes and took the average as the answer. That average will never be the answer--the answer will either be 0 or 1; not 0.5.
For that reason, his proof is flawed and I am out.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesàro_summationI'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
The sum is always 0 or 1; it's never 0.5.
Your moveInfinity is the moment of recollection the reminds the soul of it's source.
And the prying attempt of the mind to unlatch that knowledge from our being.
A battle that rages over vastness of truth not consumed by learned minds.
And a walk in the eternal never queried by our kind.
what what?
All humans are not either 2 boobed or 2 balled. Hermaphrodites throw the average off.The average human being has one boob and one ball. Only there isn't any such thing; or at least, outside a freak show.I don't need a math degree to know that this doesn't make sense and is wrong. It's simply a way for the math nerds to justify an incorrect position.Disagree because in the first sum, he simply averaged the two possible outcomes and took the average as the answer. That average will never be the answer--the answer will either be 0 or 1; not 0.5.
For that reason, his proof is flawed and I am out.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesàro_summationI'm not into advanced math so I have trouble with the first assumption that S1=1/2. It's not like that sum approaches 0.5 as you go to infinity, the sum is always either 1 or 0.
The sum is always 0 or 1; it's never 0.5.
Gotcha.Your moveInfinity is the moment of recollection the reminds the soul of it's source.
And the prying attempt of the mind to unlatch that knowledge from our being.
A battle that rages over vastness of truth not consumed by learned minds.
And a walk in the eternal never queried by our kind.
what what?