Thanks.On the off chance that you're high right now and you're kind of freaking out about this, I'd like to remind you of cookies and boobies.
There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
Thats horse poop. Solving whst problems? More math?Thanks.That does help.On the off chance that you're high right now and you're kind of freaking out about this, I'd like to remind you of cookies and boobies.
But I'm neither high nor freaked. I just heard a discussion recently on cnbc about how computers are nearing this point. They almost don't need our help anymore. They are solving their own problems.
Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
I'm not talking about them building more computers. I'm saying that they no longer need our input to continue their evolution. They will be able to solve things on their own.Thats horse poop. Solving whst problems? More math?Thanks.That does help.On the off chance that you're high right now and you're kind of freaking out about this, I'd like to remind you of cookies and boobies.
But I'm neither high nor freaked. I just heard a discussion recently on cnbc about how computers are nearing this point. They almost don't need our help anymore. They are solving their own problems.
If they start developing their own fuel sources and mining and machining their own parts then its time to worry......because those are their real problems
What are these problems that they need to solve?I'm not talking about them building more computers. I'm saying that they no longer need our input to continue their evolution. They will be able to solve things on their own.Thats horse poop. Solving whst problems? More math?If they start developing their own fuel sources and mining and machining their own parts then its time to worry......because those are their real problemsThanks.That does help.On the off chance that you're high right now and you're kind of freaking out about this, I'd like to remind you of cookies and boobies.
But I'm neither high nor freaked. I just heard a discussion recently on cnbc about how computers are nearing this point. They almost don't need our help anymore. They are solving their own problems.
I agree that nearly immortal cyborgs are far more likely to happen than autonomous computers evolving without humansI think a far more interesting question is "How long before human beings no longer need physical bodies to survive and thrive?"
Bodies are mortal. Bodies are FAR more limited by the laws of biology, chemistry, and physics. Imagine never aging or dying. Imagine being able to travel anywhere, at the speed of light (faster, if we can ever develop worm holes). Imagine not needing food, water, etc. to survive. Essentially, imagine humans becoming computers (rather than the other way around...which seems to abstractly be what the OP is driving at).
Sounds ridiculous. However, there are a lot of extremely talented scientists researching and working on this very thing. And more than a few of them think we might be within a few generations of accomplishing exactly that. We'll all be dead and gone! But our grandkids or great-grandkids might be able to visit the moon in a matter of seconds. Mars in about four minutes. Other solar systems in about four and a half years.
All of it. All of your post is either incorrect at the moment or will be incorrect relatively soon.Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
Please elaborate on the specifics of where I am wrong and whyAll of it. All of your post is either incorrect at the moment or will be incorrect relatively soon.Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
Never said problems.What are these problems that they need to solve?I'm not talking about them building more computers. I'm saying that they no longer need our input to continue their evolution. They will be able to solve things on their own.Thats horse poop. Solving whst problems? More math?If they start developing their own fuel sources and mining and machining their own parts then its time to worry......because those are their real problemsThanks.That does help.On the off chance that you're high right now and you're kind of freaking out about this, I'd like to remind you of cookies and boobies.
But I'm neither high nor freaked. I just heard a discussion recently on cnbc about how computers are nearing this point. They almost don't need our help anymore. They are solving their own problems.
They were programmed to do that with human input. They are just running more advanced algorythms to create more complex data profilesNever said problems.Data collection for one. Finding more and more ways to gather information and doing it without human input.What are these problems that they need to solve?I'm not talking about them building more computers. I'm saying that they no longer need our input to continue their evolution. They will be able to solve things on their own.Thats horse poop. Solving whst problems? More math?If they start developing their own fuel sources and mining and machining their own parts then its time to worry......because those are their real problemsThanks.That does help.On the off chance that you're high right now and you're kind of freaking out about this, I'd like to remind you of cookies and boobies.
But I'm neither high nor freaked. I just heard a discussion recently on cnbc about how computers are nearing this point. They almost don't need our help anymore. They are solving their own problems.
OKThey were programmed to do that with human input. They are just running more advanced algorythms to create more complex data profilesNever said problems.Data collection for one. Finding more and more ways to gather information and doing it without human input.What are these problems that they need to solve?I'm not talking about them building more computers. I'm saying that they no longer need our input to continue their evolution. They will be able to solve things on their own.Thats horse poop. Solving whst problems? More math?If they start developing their own fuel sources and mining and machining their own parts then its time to worry......because those are their real problemsThanks.That does help.On the off chance that you're high right now and you're kind of freaking out about this, I'd like to remind you of cookies and boobies.
But I'm neither high nor freaked. I just heard a discussion recently on cnbc about how computers are nearing this point. They almost don't need our help anymore. They are solving their own problems.
Its still just math. They are still just fancy abacuses
No I said its unlikely. We know so little about the human brain. Until we know everything about brain function it isnt possible to build a computer on par with oneOKSo you're saying it will never happen. Even in a thousand years.They were programmed to do that with human input. They are just running more advanced algorythms to create more complex data profilesIts still just math. They are still just fancy abacusesNever said problems.Data collection for one. Finding more and more ways to gather information and doing it without human input.What are these problems that they need to solve?I'm not talking about them building more computers. I'm saying that they no longer need our input to continue their evolution. They will be able to solve things on their own.Thats horse poop. Solving whst problems? More math?If they start developing their own fuel sources and mining and machining their own parts then its time to worry......because those are their real problemsThanks.That does help.On the off chance that you're high right now and you're kind of freaking out about this, I'd like to remind you of cookies and boobies.
But I'm neither high nor freaked. I just heard a discussion recently on cnbc about how computers are nearing this point. They almost don't need our help anymore. They are solving their own problems.
First, you are confusing math logic with data logic. Computers are able to locate and qualify relationships between data. As more data is understood relative to other data points, the speed of this understand will accelerate. At the point where it accelerates past the speed of human data processing , computers will exceed human intelligence.Please elaborate on the specifics of where I am wrong and whyAll of it. All of your post is either incorrect at the moment or will be incorrect relatively soon.Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
All of that is based on math. Math a rigid system which is why they can be programmed to compute it so fast. That is the only area they excel beyond usFirst, you are confusing math logic with data logic. Computers are able to locate and qualify relationships between data. As more data is understood relative to other data points, the speed of this understand will accelerate. At the point where it accelerates past the speed of human data processing , computers will exceed human intelligence.Please elaborate on the specifics of where I am wrong and whyAll of it. All of your post is either incorrect at the moment or will be incorrect relatively soon.Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
Are you suggesting everything in the universe is based on math?So are humans.Its still just math. They are still just fancy abacuses
Creativity is just the outlier of math. The machines will learn to be creative when they get to that point of calculation. Humans make the leap intuitively while computers must get there one step at a time. But get there they will.All of that is based on math. Math a rigid system which is why they can be programmed to compute it so fast. That is the only area they excel beyond usThey do not possess any degree of creativity or spatial reasoning. They are only expanding math formulas in to even larger formulas and connecting them along mathematical criteriaFirst, you are confusing math logic with data logic. Computers are able to locate and qualify relationships between data. As more data is understood relative to other data points, the speed of this understand will accelerate. At the point where it accelerates past the speed of human data processing , computers will exceed human intelligence.Please elaborate on the specifics of where I am wrong and whyAll of it. All of your post is either incorrect at the moment or will be incorrect relatively soon.Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
There is nothing amazing and threatening to us going on except the humans using the data the computer is gathering
yesAre you suggesting everything in the universe is based on math?So are humans.Its still just math. They are still just fancy abacuses
So creativity doesnt exist? It is just another formula?Creativity is just the outlier of math. The machines will learn to be creative when they get to that point of calculation. Humans make the leap intuitively while computers must get there one step at a time. But get there they will.All of that is based on math. Math a rigid system which is why they can be programmed to compute it so fast. That is the only area they excel beyond usThey do not possess any degree of creativity or spatial reasoning. They are only expanding math formulas in to even larger formulas and connecting them along mathematical criteriaFirst, you are confusing math logic with data logic. Computers are able to locate and qualify relationships between data. As more data is understood relative to other data points, the speed of this understand will accelerate. At the point where it accelerates past the speed of human data processing , computers will exceed human intelligence.Please elaborate on the specifics of where I am wrong and whyAll of it. All of your post is either incorrect at the moment or will be incorrect relatively soon.Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
There is nothing amazing and threatening to us going on except the humans using the data the computer is gathering
We know of things in the universe where it appears our math systems breaks down.So creativity doesnt exist? It is just another formula?Creativity is just the outlier of math. The machines will learn to be creative when they get to that point of calculation. Humans make the leap intuitively while computers must get there one step at a time. But get there they will.All of that is based on math. Math a rigid system which is why they can be programmed to compute it so fast. That is the only area they excel beyond usThey do not possess any degree of creativity or spatial reasoning. They are only expanding math formulas in to even larger formulas and connecting them along mathematical criteriaFirst, you are confusing math logic with data logic. Computers are able to locate and qualify relationships between data. As more data is understood relative to other data points, the speed of this understand will accelerate. At the point where it accelerates past the speed of human data processing , computers will exceed human intelligence.Please elaborate on the specifics of where I am wrong and whyAll of it. All of your post is either incorrect at the moment or will be incorrect relatively soon.Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
There is nothing amazing and threatening to us going on except the humans using the data the computer is gathering
I think there are far bigger forces at play that we yet no nothing about. We know of thinhs in the universe where our math systems break down
I disagree. Math is a tool to measure and predict things but is not the basis of everything. There are mathematical sequences that are infinite which points to it being an imperfect measuring tool at thatyesAre you suggesting everything in the universe is based on math?So are humans.Its still just math. They are still just fancy abacuses
Then how can math be the end all be all of everything?We know of things in the universe where it appears our math systems breaks down.So creativity doesnt exist? It is just another formula?I think there are far bigger forces at play that we yet no nothing about. We know of thinhs in the universe where our math systems break downCreativity is just the outlier of math. The machines will learn to be creative when they get to that point of calculation. Humans make the leap intuitively while computers must get there one step at a time. But get there they will.All of that is based on math. Math a rigid system which is why they can be programmed to compute it so fast. That is the only area they excel beyond usThey do not possess any degree of creativity or spatial reasoning. They are only expanding math formulas in to even larger formulas and connecting them along mathematical criteriaFirst, you are confusing math logic with data logic. Computers are able to locate and qualify relationships between data. As more data is understood relative to other data points, the speed of this understand will accelerate. At the point where it accelerates past the speed of human data processing , computers will exceed human intelligence.Please elaborate on the specifics of where I am wrong and whyAll of it. All of your post is either incorrect at the moment or will be incorrect relatively soon.Such as?There is absolutely nothing in this post that is factually correct. We'll done.I dont think it will happen for an extremely long time if ever
The only thing computers have over the brain is computing math quickly. They cannot think creatively and spatially
One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develope. Even one cell is likely more complex due to its ability to evolve
Computers will always be bound by programming and cant evolve on their own. The only way it could happen is to built 1 computer on par with a human brain so that computer can build and evolve more
Anyone smart enough to develope a computer like that will know the risks and probably wont be crazy enough to do it
There is nothing amazing and threatening to us going on except the humans using the data the computer is gathering
Because it only appears to. It hasn't been figured out yet.Then how can math be the end all be all of everything?
As well as many other things. And until those things are figured out how can a scientist claim that computets are close to becoming what we are?Because it only appears to. It hasn't been figured out yet.Then how can math be the end all be all of everything?
I'm not talking about computers being what we are. I'm just saying there will be a threshold where they take over without the need of our input. Computers creating computers.As well as many other things. And until those things are figured out how can a scientist claim that computets are close to becoming what we are?Because it only appears to. It hasn't been figured out yet.Then how can math be the end all be all of everything?
That doesnt mean they will enevitably become us. A computer can be programmed to build more powerful computets and so on and so on but they will all still be bound by the original programmingI'm not talking about computers being what we are. I'm just saying there will be a threshold where they take over without the need of our input. Computers creating computers.As well as many other things. And until those things are figured out how can a scientist claim that computets are close to becoming what we are?Because it only appears to. It hasn't been figured out yet.Then how can math be the end all be all of everything?
My smartphone totally agrees with you.All it takes is for someone to unplug the computer to make it useless.
What do you think that the driver-less car does?They do not possess any degree of spatial reasoning.
The earth's top 500 supercomputers combined are 3 times as powerful as a human brain: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/18/earths-supercomputing-power-surpasses-human-brain-three-times-over/One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develop.
I read of one yesterday that was 250k and drives kids around campus at colleges. It has to follow the same route and it wasn't as advanced as googles. IIRC Google's uses 3D technology to drink in a scene they're driving through and adjust.What do you think that the driver-less car does?They do not possess any degree of spatial reasoning.
Of course these are all legitimate points. I was trying to address the factual inaccuracies in his post.I read of one yesterday that was 250k and drives kids around campus at colleges. It has to follow the same route and it wasn't as advanced as googles. IIRC Google's uses 3D technology to drink in a scene they're driving through and adjust.What do you think that the driver-less car does?They do not possess any degree of spatial reasoning.
My concern is jobs and computers. A tech can repair many computers so it's not like a 1:1 ratio where if we replace an employee with a computer, there winds up being a new employee repairing it.
These fancy cars, why pay a taxi driver then?
IIRC each computer operated car is electric. Being how our economy/gov't has so much invested in the oil industry, how will this work out?
That 250k car has to become more affordable for any significant economic impact and we'll have to be able to test that as it wears down and malfunctions it doesn't start running into people and crashing into other cars and such.
ETA link http://vr-zone.com/articles/french-company-selling-driverless-navia-vehicle/70458.html
What functions do they perform better than a human brain besides math?The earth's top 500 supercomputers combined are 3 times as powerful as a human brain: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/18/earths-supercomputing-power-surpasses-human-brain-three-times-over/One brain is more complex than all the computers on the planet and has had millions of years to develop.
This car does not possess anywhere near the epatial reasoning of s human. It tollows its route and is cautious of normal obstaclesOf course these are all legitimate points. I was trying to address the factual inaccuracies in his post.I read of one yesterday that was 250k and drives kids around campus at colleges. It has to follow the same route and it wasn't as advanced as googles. IIRC Google's uses 3D technology to drink in a scene they're driving through and adjust. My concern is jobs and computers. A tech can repair many computers so it's not like a 1:1 ratio where if we replace an employee with a computer, there winds up being a new employee repairing it.What do you think that the driver-less car does?They do not possess any degree of spatial reasoning.
These fancy cars, why pay a taxi driver then?
IIRC each computer operated car is electric. Being how our economy/gov't has so much invested in the oil industry, how will this work out?
That 250k car has to become more affordable for any significant economic impact and we'll have to be able to test that as it wears down and malfunctions it doesn't start running into people and crashing into other cars and such.
ETA link http://vr-zone.com/articles/french-company-selling-driverless-navia-vehicle/70458.html
But also consider that in 2003, many were likely wondering about the point of smartphones, questioning their abilities and their prices. 10 years later and there are over 1 billion in use.
I