Yea they have become an absolute disgrace. I guess it would help if the MLB could stay not suspended or injured...It all starts up front. I would draft the two best available D-Linemen.Then I would put the rest of the D in a room where they weren't permitted to drink, smoke dope, drive under the influence or shoot anyone.I knew their D wasn't very good, but when I saw the time JP Losman was getting to throw the ball on Sunday I was![]()
Weathersby barely saw the field his rookie season. That team had no business taking a fourth round risk like that. It's rare that any draftnik has anything good to say about a Bengal pick after the 3rd round -- it's way too common to hear that there were other consensus better players available at that slot. I'd have to go back and check, but guys like Mark Anderson, Ray Edwards, etal were taken after Rucker -- who probably wasn't on anyone's radar at all at the time. I lumped Weathersby in with the others because it's difficult to give any of those picks the benefit of the doubt.Agree on the section about reaching for players, except on Dennis Weathersby. He was a product of horrible luck. I was excited about that pick, and didn't consider it a reach by any means, considering that we took him in the 4th round. The injury concern in that draft isn't what turned out to be detrimental to his career-it was the car wreck a year later.
I'm a big Williams fan but he's definitely been an inconsistent hitter since his injury. I thought he looked great this preseason but he's back to his diving and grabbing, like the rest of the team. And I've tried many, many times to purge memories of Ohalete. My 3 year old wraps up better than he did.Madieu Williams has seemed to forget how to hit this year. I remember him being very proficient in his rookie year, and especially when I watched him a bit at Maryland. I forget who it was, but one ACC player said Madieu hit as hard as anyone he'd faced. Since his shoulder injury, he has regressed considerably in aggression. That has been very disappointing, because I considered him to be one of the best up and coming safeties in the game a few short years ago. He's no Ohalate ( remember him ?), but he certainly doesn't look the same to me.
I'd take any LB with a pulse at this point. Webster included, though he's been a pretty bad tackler in Denver.I'm definitely with you on the personnel issue; at some point though the personnel you have have to show some level of improvement in at least one phase of the game. I can't remember the last time I thought, "Wow. That guy has really improved since last season." I think Geathers' 2006 improvement was more related to the weight loss than anything else -- there's not a single defender right now that is better than he was when acquired. That's almost impossible to pull off.Lastly- I'd take Nate Webster back in a New York minute. He at least plays with the attitude that this defense is lacking.
They're morons if they don't make a play for Haynesworth. Unless you believe that his play has been elevated purely because it's a contract year, he plays a position that can impact your whole defense and he's a stud. They'd also be plucking him from a competing team in their conference with similar overall talent level.Tons of great points made by Jene - next year we are looking at some premium guys as UFAs - Haynesworth, Briggs, Allen, Dansby. If the Bengals dont make a splash by signing one (if not more) of these guys, then you know that they just arent committed to improving.
I specifically didn't mention any of the possible free agents, which will include Justin Smith, because I can't make a convincing argument to pay market value for any of them.Smith is a known quantity and a role player. Break the bank for him when you've already signed Geathers to a below market contract? Haynesworth? Reputation as a bad character guy has to be an issue for this team and he's going to cost an awful lot of money. Are you sure he won't be Cory Redding and disappear after getting paid? Jared Allen is a cocktail away from a long suspension. Dansby has yet to stay healthy for a full season. Too pessimistic? Probably.I'd love to get my hands on any of them.Tons of great points made by Jene - next year we are looking at some premium guys as UFAs - Haynesworth, Briggs, Allen, Dansby. If the Bengals dont make a splash by signing one (if not more) of these guys, then you know that they just arent committed to improving.
I'm pretty conflicted (typed convicted in a Freudian slip thereThey're morons if they don't make a play for Haynesworth. Unless you believe that his play has been elevated purely because it's a contract year, he plays a position that can impact your whole defense and he's a stud. They'd also be plucking him from a competing team in their conference with similar overall talent level.Tons of great points made by Jene - next year we are looking at some premium guys as UFAs - Haynesworth, Briggs, Allen, Dansby. If the Bengals dont make a splash by signing one (if not more) of these guys, then you know that they just arent committed to improving.
Maybe . . . but lets not forget the "maturity" issues facing the entire Bengal team. I am not sure Haynesworth is the right call for this team, with the current roster make-up. I think the biggest point Jene made, was expanding the scouting department. The Bengals are notoriously cheap in that regard, relying on the coaching staff to also scout. This just in - it has not worked. That is why they are constantly reaching for draft picks. They do not have the resources to do the indepth scouting and research needed to weed out the knuckleheads.They're morons if they don't make a play for Haynesworth. Unless you believe that his play has been elevated purely because it's a contract year, he plays a position that can impact your whole defense and he's a stud. They'd also be plucking him from a competing team in their conference with similar overall talent level.Tons of great points made by Jene - next year we are looking at some premium guys as UFAs - Haynesworth, Briggs, Allen, Dansby. If the Bengals dont make a splash by signing one (if not more) of these guys, then you know that they just arent committed to improving.
I've been disappointed SO many times by Free Agency and the Bengals, that I'm trying not to get excited about these guys mentioned above. The standard procedure has been : -bringing them in for a visit, -low-balling them or not making an offer at all, -the player fly somewhere else for a visit, -hearing from the player's agent that the Bengals are one of the teams in the running (which usually is a ploy to up the stakes for teams actually willing to spend),-everyone in Bengal land gets excited, -then you hear of the player signing somewhere else. ---- then rinse and repeat with each of the other marquee names in FA, settling for table scraps of the market. Sorry, it's been a rough year for us and I'm cranky.Tons of great points made by Jene - next year we are looking at some premium guys as UFAs - Haynesworth, Briggs, Allen, Dansby. If the Bengals dont make a splash by signing one (if not more) of these guys, then you know that they just arent committed to improving.
Good point. From that standpoint the Bengals are the last team that should be adding a guy with his baggage I suppose.I'm pretty conflicted (typed convicted in a Freudian slip there :X ) about Haynesworth. Top three impact DT right now. The character issue is a major sticking point. Sign that guy to a huge deal and he goes Edward Scissorhands on someone? There'll be a million and one media types descending on Cincinnati. And I don't think there's any question Haynesworth is being motivated by a payday right now. Question is, how much?They're morons if they don't make a play for Haynesworth. Unless you believe that his play has been elevated purely because it's a contract year, he plays a position that can impact your whole defense and he's a stud. They'd also be plucking him from a competing team in their conference with similar overall talent level.Tons of great points made by Jene - next year we are looking at some premium guys as UFAs - Haynesworth, Briggs, Allen, Dansby. If the Bengals dont make a splash by signing one (if not more) of these guys, then you know that they just arent committed to improving.
Those four really are the big name D players for next year. I suspect there will be a lot of competition for each of them with the possible exception of Allen, since I think he has a history of substance supensions no? Some teams don't want to put a lot of guaranteed money on a player that is one slip away from a season sitting at home.Tons of great points made by Jene - next year we are looking at some premium guys as UFAs - Haynesworth, Briggs, Allen, Dansby. If the Bengals dont make a splash by signing one (if not more) of these guys, then you know that they just arent committed to improving.
1. Get a defensive identity.Every single top defensive team has an identity.
He's been burned quite often to be honest, but he also is getting thrown into the fire pretty early, so some patience needs to be excersised with him regarding his prospects. One thing I've noticed is that he is not affraid to make an open field tackle-something that many of his defensive teammates should take notice of. If it's a league where you must start corners, then I think Hall would certainly be worth getting on the cheap. He will continue to get tested by opposing offenses, and unless the defense miraculously gets better quick, then he'll have plenty of opportunities for open field tackles too.Simris said:A lot of insight here on Cin IDP'rs.Dare I ask: how good is CB Leon Hall?(I can get him for a song and am wondering what his long term prospects are?)
Hall would be a prototype Tampa-2 corner. He does not have elite cover skills, but his ball skills are decent and he is a physical tackling corner in run support. I suspect he will be a solid DB2-3 type down the road because I think he will have solid tackle numbers.He's been burned quite often to be honest, but he also is getting thrown into the fire pretty early, so some patience needs to be excersised with him regarding his prospects. One thing I've noticed is that he is not affraid to make an open field tackle-something that many of his defensive teammates should take notice of. If it's a league where you must start corners, then I think Hall would certainly be worth getting on the cheap. He will continue to get tested by opposing offenses, and unless the defense miraculously gets better quick, then he'll have plenty of opportunities for open field tackles too.Simris said:A lot of insight here on Cin IDP'rs.Dare I ask: how good is CB Leon Hall?(I can get him for a song and am wondering what his long term prospects are?)
Thanks guys, that helps.Hall would be a prototype Tampa-2 corner. He does not have elite cover skills, but his ball skills are decent and he is a physical tackling corner in run support. I suspect he will be a solid DB2-3 type down the road because I think he will have solid tackle numbers.He's been burned quite often to be honest, but he also is getting thrown into the fire pretty early, so some patience needs to be excersised with him regarding his prospects. One thing I've noticed is that he is not affraid to make an open field tackle-something that many of his defensive teammates should take notice of. If it's a league where you must start corners, then I think Hall would certainly be worth getting on the cheap. He will continue to get tested by opposing offenses, and unless the defense miraculously gets better quick, then he'll have plenty of opportunities for open field tackles too.A lot of insight here on Cin IDP'rs.Dare I ask: how good is CB Leon Hall?(I can get him for a song and am wondering what his long term prospects are?)
Geez, in football terms 2003-4 is ancient history. To be still pining away for him means that you're admitting failure in the interim 3-4 years to replace him. Marvin should be embarrassed to be admitting that, especially given that it's his defense.Sure am enjoying reading the local newspapers this morning.![]()
Cincinnati Post
"The position is the ghost of Takeo, I guess or something," said Lewis, referring to former Bengals linebacker Takeo Spikes. Lewis was unable to persuade Spikes to opt out of free agency in the 2003 offseason and remain with the Bengals.
....
"We had a phenomenal leader right from the start and that made a big difference," said Marvin Lewis, who was the Ravens' defensive coordinator in 1996 when they selected Ray Lewis in the first round of the draft. "When you have one guy that kind of everything else, the whole solar system, revolves around, that makes a huge difference. That would be like not having a quarterback."
That's not unreasonable, but it isn't happening in Cincinnati. Lewis is under contract through 2010 and Mike Brown has a long history of honoring contracts -- even Coslet and LeBeau weren't fired until the final year of their deals. Lewis must bear the blame for some of the poor personnel decisions and assistant coaching. But he isn't going anywhere.stevegamer said:Fire Marvin Lewis.Face it - he's a defensive coach. He's going to have major thoughts & input on the defensive side of the ball, and that's where they've been screwups. Replacing him with a different defensive-minded HC, who will keep the O intact and have a plan and have the ablls to find leaders as opposed to criminals might, just might do the trick.