What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I'm starting Kolby Smith over __________! (1 Viewer)

EdwardCat

Footballguy
I'm not starting him this week (can't really bench LT for him). I'm curious to know what others are doing, though.

 
Starting him as my #1 this week over:

Henry

Bush

Jacobs

Dayne

Not sure who my #2 is yet. Leaning towards Bush.

 
Over Bush and K. Jones

Still trying to decide if I should play Bush over Fargas....but Kolby is in for sure (I like the matchup)

 
avoiding injuries said:
Wasn't expecting that from the thread starter...I'm starting him over L White and K Curtis.
What were you expecting?
Usually a thread like this is started by an owner who is actually starting the player. At times it can be a long shot and a chance to gain reassurance and confidence in plugging the given player in the lineup.
 
Most of you in this thread are complet fools in my opinion, especially the ones starting Smith over Portis. Smith does not have higher upside than Portis. Just 3 short weeks ago Denver held KC without a TD in KC. I expect a low scoring game in Denver. If your options are Dayne or similar then yeah, go ahead and start Kolby, but if your options are Portis or Fargas then let Kolby ride the pine!!

 
Most of you in this thread are complet fools in my opinion, especially the ones starting Smith over Portis. Smith does not have higher upside than Portis. Just 3 short weeks ago Denver held KC without a TD in KC. I expect a low scoring game in Denver. If your options are Dayne or similar then yeah, go ahead and start Kolby, but if your options are Portis or Fargas then let Kolby ride the pine!!
That was with Priest Holmes running the ball. He's washed up.
 
What has Smith done exactly to be considered a #1 or 2 back? I have him in 2 leagues and doubt he'll be cracking my starting lineup.

 
I too have the FWP dilemma - and I can't believe its even a dilemma, but as I think about it, FWP is going to have to go against NE a week after Baltimore ran through them... will NE adjust or can they be overpowered (from early in the season I stated that I felt NE could be beat by a power running team... not a power back, but a strong overpowering run OL)? FWP has come up SO small this season compared to expectations. No real breakout games, no TDs.

Denver sucks against the run, but in a divisional game, who knows. I will likley roll with my first rounder, but I can't say for sure as of this moment.

 
I started him over McGahee last week and I am still feeling a bit of backlash on that. Although it hasn't prevented me of pondering to do it again.

 
Most of you in this thread are complet fools in my opinion, especially the ones starting Smith over Portis. Smith does not have higher upside than Portis. Just 3 short weeks ago Denver held KC without a TD in KC. I expect a low scoring game in Denver. If your options are Dayne or similar then yeah, go ahead and start Kolby, but if your options are Portis or Fargas then let Kolby ride the pine!!
Bigger Upside Algorithm:1. Check Denver's year to date performance versus the run; not just one game.2. Compare multiple TD rushing performances of KC versus Washington year to date.I accept that this is not a no brainer decision, but choosing Smith over Portis hardly merits "complete fools".
 
What has Smith done exactly to be considered a #1 or 2 back? I have him in 2 leagues and doubt he'll be cracking my starting lineup.
117 rush yd/g and 2 tds in his 2 starts.Going against a terrible run def, in bad weather.
No further questions your Honor.
I was just going to say that he's healthy and standing alone w/ no other back on the team really. . . .thats more than what seems to be 1/2 the teams out there right now.
 
I am undecided on Kolby. I am concerned as to who the KC QB will be and if both Huard and Croyle are out I think that will bode unfavorably for Kolby as even Denver can stop a one dimensional offense (and Herm has no trouble really dialing it down with backup QBs).

I can start 3 out of Parker, Kolby, Henry, K Jones, Peterson (Bears).

Right now I am leaning towards:

Peterson -- Fred Jackson ripped off ~ 150 total yards vs Wash and Peterson did the same vs NYG. Wash will be hurting from multiple vantage points in a short week, I like Peterson to get ~ 150 total yards and 0.6 TD

Parker - He's been very disappointing, but NE Defense has been "average" the last 2 weeks. Pitt O is multi-faceted, especially on a good track at NE (field turf, yes).

The 3rd slot is between Kolby and Henry. If Henry is deemed "healthier", he'll get the nod. I don't expect KC offense to do much and their D will get worn down in the 2nd half (like they did vs SD last week).

KJ rides the pine. Too inconsistent and Detroit is in free fall

 
Maybe over Thomas Jones, who has CLE but losing carries to Leon Washington...(but not over Ryan Grant).

 
Edge and Chester Taylor. Starting Kolby and Grant. Can 2 rookies lead me to the promised land? I sure as hell hope so.

 
Taking Earnest Graham over Kolby... talk me out of it, please. I want that Denver rush D, but I haven't seen enough from my man.

 
Kolby over Portis (maybe). It's a game-time decision for me tomorrow. CoinflipSmiley
Wow, so many tough choices this year with so few stud RBs out there.Portis is a real boom/bust but I can see the fear of downside. I have them both but in different leagues - I'd almost certainly go Portis.That said, FWP is looking worse and worse the more I think about it logically and not in terms of sitting a 1st rounder in the playoffs. FWP, fumbing issues, against a Pats team who had back to back wakeup calls and now has a "marquee" opponent and most importantly, FWP + Road games = Ouch, far too often.
 
CBS SPORTSLINE

Kolby Smith, RB KC

News: Chiefs coach Herman Edwards said Wednesday that if the team had to play today, its starting offensive tackles would be Will Svitek and Herb Taylor, both reserves that aren't considered ready to play. The Chiefs' O-line is decimated by injuries and personal issues affecting their starters. That's not good news for Kolby Smith, who is expected to run behind that patchwork O-line in Week 14 at Denver.

Analysis: The Broncos' run defense regressed last week, and if the Chiefs' O-line was healthy, Smith would be able to do well. Monitor the status of the Chiefs' line this week before going with Smith in Week 14. If they're weak at the tackles, Smith is no better than a top-end No. 3 RB.

Herb Taylor is a backup offensive gaurd. He has only seen action in one game all season which was only for short period of time. He has not started one game. Svitek has not started one game all season and has seen action in 9 of them as a fill in.

 
I've got K.Smith...but I have to pick two starters from the following:

J.Addai

F.Gore

R.Grant

K.Smith

K.Jones

Call me crazy, but right now my two starters are R.Grant vs OAK & K.Smith vs DEN...I just can't pass on the juicy matchups.

And please no smart comments on my league based on my stable of RB's...I pulled off a trade for Gore with the R.Brown owner when he went down and my WR's suck.

Edit to add: R.Grant is for sure....I'll probably change my mind with Smith and plug Addai in. I HATE benching my Studs no matter the matchup.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Edge and Chester Taylor. Starting Kolby and Grant. Can 2 rookies lead me to the promised land? I sure as hell hope so.
With AZ down to Bryant Johnson and Leonard Pope as its only real receivers this week most likely, I currently have James plugged in over Smith. AZ, one would think, HAS to run it a little more for once. Then again, who would be surprised if they didn't. I'll be flip-flopping during the week I'm sure. I see the OL issue post above, that hurts...but it's against Denver...which helps. No win this week, no playoffs. Commence pulling hair and coin flipping.Coincidentally my RB1 is Grant as well. Good luck to you, I'll need it.
 
I have Fargas,K-Smith,Bush,Mcgahee and Dayne as my RB's and I'm having a hard time deciding which 2 to start....I started the wrong 2 last week costing me the regular season champonship.....This week I'm planning on sitting K-Smith and starting Bush and Mcgahee

 
paulbertini said:
CBS SPORTSLINEKolby Smith, RB KCNews: Chiefs coach Herman Edwards said Wednesday that if the team had to play today, its starting offensive tackles would be Will Svitek and Herb Taylor, both reserves that aren't considered ready to play. The Chiefs' O-line is decimated by injuries and personal issues affecting their starters. That's not good news for Kolby Smith, who is expected to run behind that patchwork O-line in Week 14 at Denver.Analysis: The Broncos' run defense regressed last week, and if the Chiefs' O-line was healthy, Smith would be able to do well. Monitor the status of the Chiefs' line this week before going with Smith in Week 14. If they're weak at the tackles, Smith is no better than a top-end No. 3 RB. Herb Taylor is a backup offensive gaurd. He has only seen action in one game all season which was only for short period of time. He has not started one game. Svitek has not started one game all season and has seen action in 9 of them as a fill in.
Is the a "sportsline only" take on the situation?
 
I can't find this info anywhere else on the web about the OL issues.

Edit to add...

Kansas City Chiefs

INITIAL WEEK 14 INJURY/PRACTICE REPORT | RELEASED WEDNESDAY 5 DECEMBER 2007

PRACTICE REPORT

Did Not Participate In Practice

Wednesday: LB Donnie Edwards (hamstring), T Damion McIntosh (knee), T Kyle Turley (back), S Greg Wesley (head)

Limited Participation In Practice

Wednesday: RB Larry Johnson (foot), QB Tyler Thigpen (knee)

Full Participation In Practice

Wednesday: QB Brodie Croyle (back)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprised to see a few starting Kolby Smith over Henry. With the mention of the KC O-line plus on the D side, KC run D hasn't been that great lately either and is ranked 21st against the run I think to Denvers 31 ranking. Henry got 15 carries last week and even though he didn't have a high ypc he did get 2 tds. Denver beat KC a few weeks back and this game is at Denver

Well, reading in another post that Young and Hall both practiced so with the threat of losing some carries, then I guess I'm not that surprised.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't find this info anywhere else on the web about the OL issues.

Edit to add...

Kansas City Chiefs

INITIAL WEEK 14 INJURY/PRACTICE REPORT | RELEASED WEDNESDAY 5 DECEMBER 2007

PRACTICE REPORT

Did Not Participate In Practice

Wednesday: LB Donnie Edwards (hamstring), T Damion McIntosh (knee), T Kyle Turley (back), S Greg Wesley (head)

Limited Participation In Practice

Wednesday: RB Larry Johnson (foot), QB Tyler Thigpen (knee)

Full Participation In Practice

Wednesday: QB Brodie Croyle (back)
So...are we SURE that LJ is out this week? I read this article-- http://www.kansascity.com/sports/chiefs/story/388574.html -- and it matter-of-factly states that he is out, but then he goes out and practices? Has he been declared out? There is another thread in the Shark Pool about his progress jogging and such.
 
I can't find this info anywhere else on the web about the OL issues.

Edit to add...

Kansas City Chiefs

INITIAL WEEK 14 INJURY/PRACTICE REPORT | RELEASED WEDNESDAY 5 DECEMBER 2007

PRACTICE REPORT

Did Not Participate In Practice

Wednesday: LB Donnie Edwards (hamstring), T Damion McIntosh (knee), T Kyle Turley (back), S Greg Wesley (head)

Limited Participation In Practice

Wednesday: RB Larry Johnson (foot), QB Tyler Thigpen (knee)

Full Participation In Practice

Wednesday: QB Brodie Croyle (back)
So...are we SURE that LJ is out this week? I read this article-- http://www.kansascity.com/sports/chiefs/story/388574.html -- and it matter-of-factly states that he is out, but then he goes out and practices? Has he been declared out? There is another thread in the Shark Pool about his progress jogging and such.
I have to look back, but I remember the wording of him being out this week was preceeded with a modifier like "likely" or "probably" and it seemed strange. I just can't see why they would have him jogging last week and practicing with the team this week if he wasn't going to see the field. It is very odd the way KC has been playing this situation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top