What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I'm starting Pringle over _____________________ (1 Viewer)

barackdhouse

Footballguy
On an FBG players championship team that is 5-1 I am starting him (at WR2) over DK Metcalf, Corey Davis, Preston Williams, or Adams. 

Seems like he has passed Robinson for #2 WR behind Hill, with Watkins out anyway. Not sure I like the ceiling of any of these other options. My lineup is pretty strong elsewhere. I feel like the KC offense bounces back a bit tonight with quality targets to go around. My WR depth sucks. 

Anyone else out there starting this guy tonight?

 
For the #2 WR, Pringle is the better matchup against man coverage. Against zone, it's Robinson or Hardman. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Denver plays more zone. 

Denver has a strong pass defense on paper, but in reality it's not very good. They give up too many completions. This could be a smash game for Kelce if they can get him in space. 

 
I've got Tyreek in but he'll be blanketed by Harris. Thinking about starting Hardman as well at my #3 spot. Maybe one or both will hit.

 
Robinson is on my wire and I'm actually thinking about dropping Hardman for him.  A dart throw for sure but he has been playing many more snaps than Hardman...I'm sure to screw this up.

 
So glad I didn't bail on Hardman. 😎
lol I bailed on him and Robinson in multiple leagues this week. If Watkins is out, they'll both have value, but once he's back I just can't see myself starting those guys since Tyreek and Kelce have to eat and Watkins/Robinson/Hardman will all have to take turns having good weeks. 

 
Lol.

Is Pringle the "bigger body" of the leftover KC WRs?

Reason I ask, I'd think about this differently if just Hill is out vs. both Hill and Kelce. Pahommes will be looking for that big body over the middle not just the speedster (Hardman) on the outside. I don't have the insight to know if that's Pringle or say D. Robinson.

 
Lol.

Is Pringle the "bigger body" of the leftover KC WRs?

Reason I ask, I'd think about this differently if just Hill is out vs. both Hill and Kelce. Pahommes will be looking for that big body over the middle not just the speedster (Hardman) on the outside. I don't have the insight to know if that's Pringle or say D. Robinson.


Josh Gordon is cleared to play.

Just when I thought I was out...

 
Lol.

Is Pringle the "bigger body" of the leftover KC WRs?

Reason I ask, I'd think about this differently if just Hill is out vs. both Hill and Kelce. Pahommes will be looking for that big body over the middle not just the speedster (Hardman) on the outside. I don't have the insight to know if that's Pringle or say D. Robinson.
It's really going to be none of them, in my opinion. 

I see a lot of Edwards-Helaire and Darrell Williams in this game if Hill and/or Kelce is out. Lots of dinks and dunks and stuff like that. The other receivers may get 3-4 balls each but to me Andy Reid plays this one close to the vest because he would feel his defense could keep the score down against the Steeler offense.

 
In other words, he's gonna try to manage this game to an ugly win versus playing his normal offense with those guys. It's just not the same without Kelce and Hill. Obviously.

 
In other words, he's gonna try to manage this game to an ugly win versus playing his normal offense with those guys. It's just not the same without Kelce and Hill. Obviously.
if you have to start one, who do you pick?  Hardman or Pringle?  Will answer yourz.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top