whatever makes you happyPerfect for the haters and trolls....yes!......... uhh, wait, it's actually making fun of them, lol, duh.
Well, there goes keeping Revis.In the every penny counts department, NE is on the hook for trading Kenbrell Thompkins and will have to take a $834 cap hit in 2015. Not $834,000. $834. LOL.
Short article, but its good that they are seemingly getting the ball rolling sooner than later."People understand that that's a placeholder and we'll get to work on trying to make [an extension] happen," Kraft said in the interview.
Kraft also praised Revis in the radio interview.
"He's been everything and more since he's been here," he said. "Patriots fans knew what he was like on the field, but didn't know what he was like off it. Having worn green all those years and the blind emotion we all have toward the Jets, you have one perception of the man. And the man is very different than that. He's a great guy and he works hard. There is no over-ego to him and he's a great teammate. He's been a real pleasure to have him as part of the organization."
No. We did just fine with an unconventional defense this season.Honestly, they don't need a pass rusher, the current problem with their pass rush is their pass rushers are occupied playing complex positions because of injuries.Let me rephrase ...if we could resign revis vereen and connolly AND fet an elite pass rusher would you be ok if mccourtey walked? Obviously id rather he stayed but our pass rush is fairly vanilla.
I see him as a rougher Logan Ryan. Can never have too much DB depth.So what's expected of Super Bowl star Malcom Butler going forward?
Does he become a productive starter for years to come?
... or does he fade away after and become forgotten like a David Tyree?
He sure looked better to the ball than Ryan did. At least in that game. Team mates were saying he's been doing that all year. Just his size...I see him as a rougher Logan Ryan. Can never have too much DB depth.So what's expected of Super Bowl star Malcom Butler going forward?
Does he become a productive starter for years to come?
... or does he fade away after and become forgotten like a David Tyree?
What I meant by the comparison is they aren't particular impressive in coverage but are great ball hawks.He sure looked better to the ball than Ryan did. At least in that game. Team mates were saying he's been doing that all year. Just his size...I see him as a rougher Logan Ryan. Can never have too much DB depth.So what's expected of Super Bowl star Malcom Butler going forward?
Does he become a productive starter for years to come?
... or does he fade away after and become forgotten like a David Tyree?
We're getting out of my depth here, anyway.What I meant by the comparison is they aren't particular impressive in coverage but are great ball hawks.He sure looked better to the ball than Ryan did. At least in that game. Team mates were saying he's been doing that all year. Just his size...I see him as a rougher Logan Ryan. Can never have too much DB depth.So what's expected of Super Bowl star Malcom Butler going forward?
Does he become a productive starter for years to come?
... or does he fade away after and become forgotten like a David Tyree?
Hmmm. Possible sig?We're getting out of my depth here, anyway.What I meant by the comparison is they aren't particular impressive in coverage but are great ball hawks.He sure looked better to the ball than Ryan did. At least in that game. Team mates were saying he's been doing that all year. Just his size...I see him as a rougher Logan Ryan. Can never have too much DB depth.So what's expected of Super Bowl star Malcom Butler going forward?
Does he become a productive starter for years to come?
... or does he fade away after and become forgotten like a David Tyree?
I think the upside is a more reliable Arrington...Arrington is an odd player...he can look really bad (like the Super Bowl) but he can also look real good like he did helping shut down TYH in the AFC Title game (he was excellent in that game)...I like Arrington and think he's a legit NFL CB but he's still a wildcard because when he looks bad he really looks awful...if Butler can play more like the "good" Arrington he can have a very productive career...Bossman said:So what's expected of Super Bowl star Malcom Butler going forward?
Does he become a productive starter for years to come?
... or does he fade away after and become forgotten like a David Tyree?
At least three REALLY good plays on the ball. Including the Kearse -- what do you call that?Rewatching the game and the various other media (SoundFX/Inside the NFL), Butler played a great game all around. The miracle catch Kearse made was just that, Butler played the ball amazingly, almost picked it - completely broke it up, Kearse just got a good bounce.
Just watched the game over and you're dead on...he played like a veteran...Seattle tested him (as they should have) and he more than held his own...he really was involved in quite a few big plays and did very well for himself......Rewatching the game and the various other media (SoundFX/Inside the NFL), Butler played a great game all around. The miracle catch Kearse made was just that, Butler played the ball amazingly, almost picked it - completely broke it up, Kearse just got a good bounce.
arrington's a slot receiver --- he'll never be good on the outside against bigger receiversI think the upside is a more reliable Arrington...Arrington is an odd player...he can look really bad (like the Super Bowl) but he can also look real good like he did helping shut down TYH in the AFC Title game (he was excellent in that game)...I like Arrington and think he's a legit NFL CB but he's still a wildcard because when he looks bad he really looks awful...if Butler can play more like the "good" Arrington he can have a very productive career...Bossman said:So what's expected of Super Bowl star Malcom Butler going forward?
Does he become a productive starter for years to come?
... or does he fade away after and become forgotten like a David Tyree?
I did not mean the type of player as much as I meant the level of player...even though they are the same size (Butler is 5'11" and 190 while Arrington is 5'10" 190) right now it does appear Butler maybe better on the outside while there is little doubt Arrington is better suited for the slot...arrington's a slot receiver --- he'll never be good on the outside against bigger receiversI think the upside is a more reliable Arrington...Arrington is an odd player...he can look really bad (like the Super Bowl) but he can also look real good like he did helping shut down TYH in the AFC Title game (he was excellent in that game)...I like Arrington and think he's a legit NFL CB but he's still a wildcard because when he looks bad he really looks awful...if Butler can play more like the "good" Arrington he can have a very productive career...Bossman said:So what's expected of Super Bowl star Malcom Butler going forward?
Does he become a productive starter for years to come?
... or does he fade away after and become forgotten like a David Tyree?
butler's a longer corner suited more for the outside, which is why they pulled arrington off that one dude and put butler on him
it's kind of funny that the guy that was torching us is the reason butler was in there which is why they lost
What's with the capitalization of just about every word?Yeah, But They aren't Starting High
If They don't Tag he'll Hit The Market In A Couple Weeks
A Lot Of Tbe Time Tavging Is Just The First Step To Exte.sions
They have to move on him by March 4th right? God I hope he comes back. What a difference maker. He was the missing piece of the puzzle these last 5 years.Kraft says they plan to work an extension for Revis
Short article, but its good that they are seemingly getting the ball rolling sooner than later."People understand that that's a placeholder and we'll get to work on trying to make [an extension] happen," Kraft said in the interview.
Kraft also praised Revis in the radio interview.
"He's been everything and more since he's been here," he said. "Patriots fans knew what he was like on the field, but didn't know what he was like off it. Having worn green all those years and the blind emotion we all have toward the Jets, you have one perception of the man. And the man is very different than that. He's a great guy and he works hard. There is no over-ego to him and he's a great teammate. He's been a real pleasure to have him as part of the organization."
"Rich Man's Talib" apt on many levels.They have to move on him by March 4th right? God I hope he comes back. What a difference maker. He was the missing piece of the puzzle these last 5 years.Kraft says they plan to work an extension for Revis
Short article, but its good that they are seemingly getting the ball rolling sooner than later."People understand that that's a placeholder and we'll get to work on trying to make [an extension] happen," Kraft said in the interview.
Kraft also praised Revis in the radio interview.
"He's been everything and more since he's been here," he said. "Patriots fans knew what he was like on the field, but didn't know what he was like off it. Having worn green all those years and the blind emotion we all have toward the Jets, you have one perception of the man. And the man is very different than that. He's a great guy and he works hard. There is no over-ego to him and he's a great teammate. He's been a real pleasure to have him as part of the organization."
Brilliant signing by the pats. I watched the Superbowl again for the 4th time yesterday, and Butler wasn't just great on that game ending pick - he made several huge plays in the 2nd half.ProFootballTalk @ProFootballTalk 2h2 hours ago
Overlooked elsewhere, Malcolm Butler had supporters in New England http://wp.me/p14QSB-9HJo
1a. DGB
1b. Jaelen Strong
3a. Maxx Williams
3b. Devin Funchess
5. Sammie Coates (don't think hes a good fit)
There will be a lot of good DL/OL available after the first round, the skill position players will have dried up by then, imo.I know picking by positions is not how the pats do it, but I would lean towards a DT in the 1st, OG in 2nd, and depending on value a WR and RB in the 3rd and 4th, possibly double dipping on RB in the 4th if he value is there and if we keep Vareen and/or Ridley
Normally I'd agree, but there are some first rate skill players that simply won't be available at the 64, the Pats have five picks between the end of the 2nd and the end of the 4th. Its a pretty huge drop off from the 32 to the 64, have a legit shot at some decent weapons.I'd be happy with nothing but linemen. If it's a deep draft, go fishing for pro bowlers. Especially if they can get some edge rush and another big body to rotate with wilfork.
WR, alternatively TE. Really depends on how they plan to proceed next season offensively, I think it makes sense for them to get bigger, play heavier sets and try to balance out the offense - whether that means drafting another TE or a big WR doesn't really matter to me.If they never draft another wide receiver in the Tom Brady era, that would be fine by me. They suck at it. Tight ends is decently stocked, toO.
Running back is cheap and plentiful in free agency. Blount and Bolden are a good enough start that I'm not even worried about keeping vereen and certainly not ridley. a dominant back would be fun, but not really necessary.
if we're talking about defense, what need is bigger than d line? I wouldn't sneeze at a quality safety, but unless there's an impact playmaker, it's not a huge need. a run stopping linebacker would be nice, but they've got mayo coming back.
What do you think the big skill position needs are?
In the BB/Brady era they haven't spent a single first on a WR, they took a handful of WRs in the second 4 or 5, Branch being the only of consequence - Dobson being the most recent and biggest bust imo.I don't understand any fan wanting them to waste yet another high pick on a WR
Name me the last SB champ to have a franchise WR that was drafted in the first round. Heck, name me the last SB champ that had a "franchise" WR on their roster.In the BB/Brady era they haven't spent a single first on a WR, they took a handful of WRs in the second 4 or 5, Branch being the only ofI don't understand any fan wanting them to
waste yet another high pick on a WR
consequence - Dobson being the most recent
and biggest bust imo.
Last five first round picks, Devin Mccourty, Nate
Solder, Chandler Jones, Dont'a Hightower and
Dominique Easley.
Lafell is a patchwork solution to their poor
receiving corp, Edelman has been a boss but
hes only one little man (pretty worried about him following Welker's footsteps.)
I get the point you made, I'm also familiar with the Patriots lack of history of drafting successful WRs. But if one of those guys I mentioned slips to the Pats and they don't trade out of it or take them - I'm gonna be more disappointed than usual with the NE draft.Name me the last SB champ to have a franchise WR that was drafted in the first round. Heck, name me the last SB champ that had a "franchise" WR on their roster.Inthe BB/Brady era they haven't spent a single first on a WR, they took a handful of WRs in the second 4 or 5, Branch being the only ofI don't understand any fan wanting them to
waste yet another high pick on a WR
consequence - Dobson being the most recent
and biggest bust imo.
Last five first round picks, Devin Mccourty, Nate
Solder, Chandler Jones, Dont'a Hightower and
Dominique Easley.
Lafell is a patchwork solution to their poor
receiving corp, Edelman has been a boss but
hes only one little man (pretty worried about him following Welker's footsteps.)