What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is Quentin Tarantino a hack? (2 Viewers)

Is Quentin Tarantino a hack?


  • Total voters
    398
Quentin Tarantino Talks Possibilities For His Final 2 Movies

http://screenrant.com/quentin-tarantino-final-2-movies/

Over the years, Quentin Tarantino has said that he wants to make 10 movies before retiring from film making and taking up a life of writing novels, film criticism, and other creative endeavors. So it looks like there will only be two more Quentin Tarantino movies before he calls it quits.

While his statements on retirement aren’t official or binding, it seems that the director is very serious on keeping his filmography at 10 movies. Although QT always talks about possible new projects he’s working on (which will most likely never come to fruition), like Kill Bill 3 or the Vega Brothers movie with John Travolta and Michael Madsen, it will always be interesting to hear what he might do next. Recently, during the press conference for The Hateful Eight in New York City, Tarantino talked about four ideas for potential new movies, but it’s unclear which would be his next two. Let’s take a look at his movie ideas.

“The third Western could actually be a TV thing. I’ve owned the rights for a while —I get them and I lose them and then I get them. This piece which I think really demands that I make it which is Elmore Leonard book called ’Forty Lashes Less One.’ I actually think if you’re going to call yourself a Western director today, you need to do at least three [films]. And I would really like to do [the Leonard book] as a mini-series, like an hour an episode, four or five hours —I’d write and direct it all. And it’s right along the lines of ‘Django [unchained]’ and ‘Hateful Eight,’ as it deals with race and it all takes place in a territorial prison. It’s a really good book and I’ve always wanted to tell that story, so we’ll see.”

There’s also a potential spin-off/sequel to Inglourious Basterds called Killer Crow that Tarantino could make one day. When he was originally working on the first draft of the WWII film, it was much longer with more storylines and characters than what appeared in the final version of the Academy Award winning movie. He stopped working on it to make Kill Bill, but picked it up again and re-worked Inglourious Basterds to make it smaller. Killer Crow was actually part of the original Inglourious Basterds, which Tarantino talked about with The Playlist:

“The thing is, the huge stuff that I took out could make its own movie, following a platoon of black troops that were court-martialed and they escape. They are in France, they are going to be hung in London and their whole thing is to get to Switzerland. And they end up getting into an adventure and they meet the Basterds, so I ended up taking all that out. So I could still do that. I’m not done with it. It’s the closest thing that I have which is a big piece of material that hasn’t been done before. And I would still need to end it and relook at the whole thing again, but that could happen.

As movie fans know, Quentin Tarantino is a big fan of jumping around from genre to genre whenever he comes out with a new movie. He’s one of the rare directors out there that can go from making a martial arts movie like Kill Bill to a grindhouse slasher film like Death Proof without missing a beat. When asked about making a straight up horror film as one of his next movies, QT responded:

“I don’t know. I did do my little deconstruction on the slasher movie with [‘Death Proof’], but I don’t think I have the right kind of temperament to do something like ‘The Exorcist,’ that is all about one tone of dread carrying through. I like breaking up [tones] a little bit. If I were really going to do a horror film, it would something like [shifting tones], but I honestly don’t think I have the right temperament. I like going up and down and up and down and I think that would take away from the horror.”

Finally, when asked if he’d ever make a movie in a genre that he hadn’t tackled yet, Tarantino talked briefly about possibly making a gangster movie. He revealed:

“It would be fun to do a ‘30s gangster movie, like ‘Bonnie And Clyde’ or ‘Dillinger,’ with the tommy guns and that kind of thing. That’s something I haven’t done and that would be cool.”

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I had a thought and I figure this is a decent place to discuss:

I've been thinking about a scene in Pulp Fiction, and it bugs me. While the movie is outlandish and silly at times, there are plenty of scenes you could imagine were possible. Except one...when Winston Wolf helps Jules and Vincent clean out the bloody car, he tells them to follow him. He says something like, "I drive really fast." So the entire point of this scene is to evade the police and dispose of the body and the car. But Wolf drives 80 mph on city streets in an Acura NSX? Silly. Anyway, whatever.

 
jdoggydogg said:
I had a thought and I figure this is a decent place to discuss:

I've been thinking about a scene in Pulp Fiction, and it bugs me. While the movie is outlandish and silly at times, there are plenty of scenes you could imagine were possible. Except one...when Winston Wolf helps Jules and Vincent clean out the bloody car, he tells them to follow him. He says something like, "I drive really fast." So the entire point of this scene is to evade the police and dispose of the body and the car. But Wolf drives 80 mph on city streets in an Acura NSX? Silly. Anyway, whatever.
I know a lot of people love The Wolf, but I really dislike this whole series.  I know a lot has to with QT himself trying to act, but also with them calling the Wolf, and him really not doing anything.  Maybe that's the gag, but besides knowing the guy at the junkyard, do they really need to call somebody to tell them to clean out their bloody ####in' car?

 
jdoggydogg said:
I had a thought and I figure this is a decent place to discuss:

I've been thinking about a scene in Pulp Fiction, and it bugs me. While the movie is outlandish and silly at times, there are plenty of scenes you could imagine were possible. Except one...when Winston Wolf helps Jules and Vincent clean out the bloody car, he tells them to follow him. He says something like, "I drive really fast." So the entire point of this scene is to evade the police and dispose of the body and the car. But Wolf drives 80 mph on city streets in an Acura NSX? Silly. Anyway, whatever.
He's the wolf

if he gets a ticket he will beat it

 
jdoggydogg said:
I had a thought and I figure this is a decent place to discuss:

I've been thinking about a scene in Pulp Fiction, and it bugs me. While the movie is outlandish and silly at times, there are plenty of scenes you could imagine were possible. Except one...when Winston Wolf helps Jules and Vincent clean out the bloody car, he tells them to follow him. He says something like, "I drive really fast." So the entire point of this scene is to evade the police and dispose of the body and the car. But Wolf drives 80 mph on city streets in an Acura NSX? Silly. Anyway, whatever.
Heh, I never thought of that, but that's a good point.  Then again, that could have been the Wolf just talking ####, meaning he didn't drive as fast as normal given the circumstances.  Saying what he said was basically him saying, "Do what I do and try to keep up."

I know a lot of people love The Wolf, but I really dislike this whole series.  I know a lot has to with QT himself trying to act, but also with them calling the Wolf, and him really not doing anything.  Maybe that's the gag, but besides knowing the guy at the junkyard, do they really need to call somebody to tell them to clean out their bloody ####in' car?
I don't think them calling them the Wolf was odd. It's not like he was someone unheard of who showed up. When Jules heard he was coming, he knew who he was, so the Wolf obviously had a major league reputation in the crime world at the time. 

 
I know a lot of people love The Wolf, but I really dislike this whole series.  I know a lot has to with QT himself trying to act, but also with them calling the Wolf, and him really not doing anything.  Maybe that's the gag, but besides knowing the guy at the junkyard, do they really need to call somebody to tell them to clean out their bloody ####in' car?
Tarantino's not a good actor, but I still enjoy those scenes.

 
Tarantino's not a good actor, but I still enjoy those scenes.
this is usually the point where i ask you if Q's penis tastes different from fanboys' and we go for pgs of ####, but i'm not going for it this time.

ETA: i dont argue with Rush fans anymore either. One shot and move on. I'm so mature in my decrepitude....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
this is usually the point where i ask you if Q's penis tastes different from fanboys' and we go for pgs of ####, but i'm not going for it this time.

ETA: i dont argue with Rush fans anymore either. One shot and move on. I'm so mature in my decrepitude....
So you aren't going to troll me with homophobic references? Got it.

 
I know a lot of people love The Wolf, but I really dislike this whole series.  I know a lot has to with QT himself trying to act, but also with them calling the Wolf, and him really not doing anything.  Maybe that's the gag, but besides knowing the guy at the junkyard, do they really need to call somebody to tell them to clean out their bloody ####in' car?
I like how they tell him its a pleasure to watch him work.

 
I know a lot of people love The Wolf, but I really dislike this whole series.  I know a lot has to with QT himself trying to act, but also with them calling the Wolf, and him really not doing anything.  Maybe that's the gag, but besides knowing the guy at the junkyard, do they really need to call somebody to tell them to clean out their bloody ####in' car?
One of my primary duties at work (and favorite things I do there) is to bail out projects that are completely fubar and get them back on track, so I love that whole Wolf exchange.

As for your post, sometimes people in chaotic circumstances just need a steady hand at the wheel to let them know things are going to be ok.

 
Haven't read the whole thread, but I think Tarantino is probably a hack. That said, I like some of his movies a lot, some a lot less. Overall, I think he peaked early and has been in steady decline in terms of the quality of his movies. Or, maybe I have just tired of his oeuvre.

My ratings of his films (features where he was credited as a director only)

Reservoir Dogs: B
Pulp Fiction: A
Jackie Brown: A
Kill Bill Vol. 1: B-
Kill Bill Vol. 2: B+
Grindhouse/Deathproof: Didn't see it
Inglorious Basterds: C+
Django Unchained: Didn't see it
The Hateful Eight: C-


 

 
Haven't read the whole thread, but I think Tarantino is probably a hack. That said, I like some of his movies a lot, some a lot less. Overall, I think he peaked early and has been in steady decline in terms of the quality of his movies. Or, maybe I have just tired of his oeuvre.

My ratings of his films (features where he was credited as a director only)

Reservoir Dogs: B
Pulp Fiction: A
Jackie Brown: A
Kill Bill Vol. 1: B-
Kill Bill Vol. 2: B+
Grindhouse/Deathproof: Didn't see it
Inglorious Basterds: C+
Django Unchained: Didn't see it
The Hateful Eight: C-
Tarantino didn't direct Natural Born Killers or True Romance. But those scripts are so very Tarantino I would add them in spirit.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Chesterfield scene in True Romance alone moves the entire movie to an "A" for me.  

Red, you're being generous with Inglorious Basterds.  That movie was a pile of dog #####.  

 
Red, you're being generous with Inglorious Basterds.  That movie was a pile of dog #####.  
Probably. There were a couple scenes I really liked and a couple characters I really enjoyed, but otherwise it wasn't good.

So upon further reflection, I would move it to a C- and the Hateful Eight to a D.

 
I gave up on him after Basterds.  I never saw the Kill Bills....Just not interested in that genre. At all.  

Killing Hitler is the new shark jump for me.  It was a run, Quentin.

 
The Chesterfield scene in True Romance alone moves the entire movie to an "A" for me.  

Red, you're being generous with Inglorious Basterds.  That movie was a pile of dog #####.  
It is a weird movie for me, as he still gravitated to the Rodriguez/Grindhouse BS a bit in that one, especially with the over the top silly gore at the end.  BUT I do think that the first scene and the scene in the basement bar are probably the best things he has put on film yet, so that trumps the shlock for me.  I have it #3 on my list of his movies.  There are 3-4 scenes in that movie that are just jawdroppingly good. 

 
It is a weird movie for me, as he still gravitated to the Rodriguez/Grindhouse BS a bit in that one, especially with the over the top silly gore at the end.  BUT I do think that the first scene and the scene in the basement bar are probably the best things he has put on film yet, so that trumps the shlock for me.  I have it #3 on my list of his movies.  There are 3-4 scenes in that movie that are just jawdroppingly good. 
I am nowhere near the movie snob you are, but I agree about those two scenes, in particular.

 
Pulp in my top 5 all time.

Basterds and django just came off silly to me.  Thought of them as a waste of his time.  

After kill bill, which i enjoyed, i wanted something a bit morr grounded.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is a weird movie for me, as he still gravitated to the Rodriguez/Grindhouse BS a bit in that one, especially with the over the top silly gore at the end.  BUT I do think that the first scene and the scene in the basement bar are probably the best things he has put on film yet, so that trumps the shlock for me.  I have it #3 on my list of his movies.  There are 3-4 scenes in that movie that are just jawdroppingly good. 
I am nowhere near the movie snob you are, but I agree about those two scenes, in particular.
The opening scene in the farmhouse was pretty awesome, as well.

 
BUT I do think that the first scene and the scene in the basement bar are probably the best things he has put on film yet, so that trumps the shlock for me.  I have it #3 on my list of his movies.  There are 3-4 scenes in that movie that are just jawdroppingly good. 
I was going to respond and mention these two scenes as well - they are incredibly good.  Plus Hans Landa is an exceptional character and Christoph Waltz's performance was awesome.  Landa is an evil, matter-of-fact, delightful guy all at the same time and that paradox was delivered perfectly by Waltz (he won an academy award).

These scenes and Waltz/Landa are reasons I really like this movie overall.

 
I liked inglorious basterds.  But yeah his best work seems behind him.....Unless he can find somebody else to rip off  :excited:

 
Uggh...will likely download (seriously doubt will pay to see in theaters). Had my doubts once  the era and general plot of the movie was unveiled, now really out.

Also getting tired of the Tarantino movie countdown (" 9th film from Quentin Tarantino "). 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top