Bracie Smathers
Footballguy
I own Starks and don't have great expectations but I'm not down on him either.
I'm trying to figure out what he's capable of.
Some background.
Late sixth round draft pick in 2010 and was injured and didn't a chance till late November of that year. Ran well for a rookie who missed all mini camps and OTAs and training camp etc.
Last year the expectations were higher at this time but the situation turned into a full-fledged RBBC and Starks got injured.
Grant is gone and the Pack hasn't devoted any resources to the RB position add that Starks is healthy yet very little talk about Starks on the boards.
ROTO's take:
ROTO World
I'm trying to figure out what he's capable of.
Some background.
Late sixth round draft pick in 2010 and was injured and didn't a chance till late November of that year. Ran well for a rookie who missed all mini camps and OTAs and training camp etc.
Last year the expectations were higher at this time but the situation turned into a full-fledged RBBC and Starks got injured.
Grant is gone and the Pack hasn't devoted any resources to the RB position add that Starks is healthy yet very little talk about Starks on the boards.
ROTO's take:
ROTO World
My linkWith free agent Ryan Grant out of the backfield picture, the Packers are committed to James Starks as their lead back. Just as he did in OTAs, Starks handled first-team reps in Tuesday's minicamp session. "He's a young raw guy that needs to play," said coach Mike McCarthy. "If he can stay healthy, I think he'll make a significant jump as a player." For the primary back in an explosive offense, Starks has received surprisingly little buzz this offseason. He's well worth the price tag at his current late-sixth round ADP. Jun 12 - 7:04 PM
Green is still recuperating from his blown out ACL and isn't expected to be full strength for a few more months.Seems very little talk about Starks and I hadn't really given too much thought to him but feel he's worthy of some discussion.... Indeed, Grant’s locker was given away to a wide receiver, a pretty good sign that the running back position in Green Bay now belongs to James Starks. As he enters his third go-around in the NFL, Starks is convinced he’s ready to have a breakout season.
“I believe I can,” he said last week, “and I believe I will.”
The Packers apparently believe the same thing because their lack of movement at the position indicates they’re happy with what they’ve got. But given the oft-injured, unproven players the Packers have at running back, this clearly is the biggest roll of the offseason dice for general manager Ted Thompson.
On a team that has cornered the market on wide receivers, acquired a good portion of the world’s supply of defensive ends and assembled enough cornerbacks to possibly bump future Hall of Famer Charles Woodson inside, the Packers remain perilously thin at only one position — running back — entering this week’s minicamp.
“I like the way James Starks is moving,” McCarthy said. “It’s nice to see Alex Green out there. Brandon is so consistent; probably the most consistent guy we have back there. I think both young free agents have a chance as far as their movement ability.”
The truth is, the Packers’ running game this season rests largely in the hands of Starks, who said he’s been working on flexibility and endurance in hopes of avoiding injuries.