What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jason Kendall To The Cubs (1 Viewer)

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...sp&c_id=mlb

A's deal catcher Kendall to Cubs

OAKLAND -- The A's on Monday traded veteran catcher Jason Kendall to the Chicago Cubs, MLB.com has learned.

Kendall wasn't in Oakland's starting lineup for the opener of a three-game series against the visiting Texas Rangers on Monday, nor did he join the team for batting practice. Several sources confirmed that he was in the A's clubhouse, showering and packing for a flight to Chicago, where the Cubs are hosting the Giants in a four-game series.

Contacted by phone early Monday evening, A's general manager Billy Beane confirmed the deal but would not reveal the name of the player being acquired in exchange for Kendall. MLB.com has learned that the player is a Minor League left-handed pitcher.

Beane said the decision to deal Kendall wasn't easy given Kendall's rapport with Oakland's promising collection of young pitchers, headlined by Dan Haren, Joe Blanton and Chad Gaudin, but noted that rookie Kurt Suzuki appears ready for "baptism by fire."

"We've always been an organization that's given young guys a chance, and we think Kurt deserves a chance right now," Beane said of Suzuki, who was batting .269 in 10 games with Oakland through Sunday.

"And at the same time, this gives Jason, whom I have nothing but respect for, a chance to go somewhere he can play every day -- and play for a very good team with a good chance of making the playoffs.

"I think this works out well for both sides."

Acquired in a November 2004 trade with the Pittsburgh Pirates, Kendall batted .271 in his first season with the A's and batted .295 in 2006 while helping Oakland reach the American League Championship Series by hitting .323 with 50 runs scored in 70 games after the All-Star break.

Scheduled to make more than $13.4 million this season -- the Pirates are reportedly paying $5 million of it -- in the final year of his contract, Kendall was batting .226 with two homers, 26 RBIs and an on-base percentage of .261 through Sunday.
mlb.com is also reporting that it is Sean Marshall going to the A's
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rotoworld =

According to ESPN, the A's will receive Rob Bowen and a minor league pitcher from the Cubs for Jason Kendall.

That's realistic. Instead of calling up J.D. Closser, the A's can keep Bowen as Kurt Suzuki's backup. Suzuki is worth adding in any AL-only leagues in which he's available. Kendall will play regularly for the Cubs, though he might not get get quite as many starts as he usually does if Henry Blanco can come back healthy. His fantasy value would get a boost if the Cubs try him as a No. 2 hitter.

 
Finally he's gone.

Dude was a bust in Oakland.

We're fading and hopefully some young blood can give the A's a playoff push.

 
I like the headline on ESPN -- "Trying to catch up, Cubs deal for A's Kendall."

Do you think they realize he is having an historically bad season? He's practically worse than Neifi!

 
Do you think they realize he is having an historically bad season? He's practically worse than Neifi!
The key is "Kendall's rapport with Oakland's promising collection of young pitchers." The Cubs need a guy that the pitchers can get along with and trust. Even if they get almost no plate production from Kendall, he could still be a very good upgrade.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you think they realize he is having an historically bad season? He's practically worse than Neifi!
The key is "Kendall's rapport with Oakland's promising collection of young pitchers." The Cubs need a guy that the pitchers can get along with and trust. Even if they don't get almost no plate production from Kendall, he could still be a very good upgrade.
Am I the only one who is ecstatic with this deal? And before you just chop and say "Yes," hear me out.Change of scenery is sometimes good for a player. Offensively, everybody knows he has the potential to bust out. At the same time, his rapport with pitchers is a big bonus. With the way the rest of the lineup is going, the Cubs can afford to give up absolutelynothing (very happy to hear it wasn't Sean Marshall) for a catcher that at worst, will be the same offensively as you were getting but can handle a staff much better. And at best, he could come back to Pittsburgh Pirates form. Hell, even at 2006 form with a .295 average with full-time play will be a lot better thatn what the Cubs are getting. He has potential for power but that's not what the Cubs need. We could use a .270 hitter at the No. 8 spot.I think that's what he'll do.
 
Do you think they realize he is having an historically bad season? He's practically worse than Neifi!
The key is "Kendall's rapport with Oakland's promising collection of young pitchers." The Cubs need a guy that the pitchers can get along with and trust. Even if they don't get almost no plate production from Kendall, he could still be a very good upgrade.
Am I the only one who is ecstatic with this deal? And before you just chop and say "Yes," hear me out.Change of scenery is sometimes good for a player. Offensively, everybody knows he has the potential to bust out. At the same time, his rapport with pitchers is a big bonus. With the way the rest of the lineup is going, the Cubs can afford to give up absolutelynothing (very happy to hear it wasn't Sean Marshall) for a catcher that at worst, will be the same offensively as you were getting but can handle a staff much better. And at best, he could come back to Pittsburgh Pirates form. Hell, even at 2006 form with a .295 average with full-time play will be a lot better thatn what the Cubs are getting. He has potential for power but that's not what the Cubs need. We could use a .270 hitter at the No. 8 spot.I think that's what he'll do.
I'm not ecstatic, but I do think it's a good move. The guy is close to a lifetime .300 hitter ( .295 just last year), and also has a lifetime OBP of .375. He's been hitting better the last few weeks and I think will continue to turn it around. He started slow last year also and batted .320 after the AS break. He supposedly is a great clubhouse guy, can handle the pitchers, and we gave basically nothing up for him. I like the move also.
 
Do you think they realize he is having an historically bad season? He's practically worse than Neifi!
The key is "Kendall's rapport with Oakland's promising collection of young pitchers." The Cubs need a guy that the pitchers can get along with and trust. Even if they don't get almost no plate production from Kendall, he could still be a very good upgrade.
Am I the only one who is ecstatic with this deal? And before you just chop and say "Yes," hear me out.Change of scenery is sometimes good for a player. Offensively, everybody knows he has the potential to bust out. At the same time, his rapport with pitchers is a big bonus. With the way the rest of the lineup is going, the Cubs can afford to give up absolutelynothing (very happy to hear it wasn't Sean Marshall) for a catcher that at worst, will be the same offensively as you were getting but can handle a staff much better. And at best, he could come back to Pittsburgh Pirates form. Hell, even at 2006 form with a .295 average with full-time play will be a lot better thatn what the Cubs are getting. He has potential for power but that's not what the Cubs need. We could use a .270 hitter at the No. 8 spot.I think that's what he'll do.
I'm not ecstatic, but I do think it's a good move. The guy is close to a lifetime .300 hitter ( .295 just last year), and also has a lifetime OBP of .375. He's been hitting better the last few weeks and I think will continue to turn it around. He started slow last year also and batted .320 after the AS break. He supposedly is a great clubhouse guy, can handle the pitchers, and we gave basically nothing up for him. I like the move also.
:thumbdown: A's get rid of this slug and open up some time for Suzuki.
 
I think he'll do very well offensively for the Cubs. He's exactly the type of slap and run hitter that Lou loves, and Kendall has worked with Cubs hitting coach Gerald Perry before.

Defensively, he calls a good game, and he'll be in the 25% or so CS range (not good, but acceptable).

They got him for peanuts, and there's no long term implications since Kendall is a FA at the end of the season, so if it doesn't work out it really won't hurt much.

 
They got him for peanuts, and there's no long term implications since Kendall is a FA at the end of the season, so if it doesn't work out it really won't hurt much.
And if it does work out, he'll be more likely to stay considering the situation he just came from.
 
Do you think they realize he is having an historically bad season? He's practically worse than Neifi!
The key is "Kendall's rapport with Oakland's promising collection of young pitchers." The Cubs need a guy that the pitchers can get along with and trust. Even if they don't get almost no plate production from Kendall, he could still be a very good upgrade.
Am I the only one who is ecstatic with this deal? And before you just chop and say "Yes," hear me out.Change of scenery is sometimes good for a player. Offensively, everybody knows he has the potential to bust out. At the same time, his rapport with pitchers is a big bonus. With the way the rest of the lineup is going, the Cubs can afford to give up absolutelynothing (very happy to hear it wasn't Sean Marshall) for a catcher that at worst, will be the same offensively as you were getting but can handle a staff much better. And at best, he could come back to Pittsburgh Pirates form. Hell, even at 2006 form with a .295 average with full-time play will be a lot better thatn what the Cubs are getting. He has potential for power but that's not what the Cubs need. We could use a .270 hitter at the No. 8 spot.I think that's what he'll do.
I'm not ecstatic, but I do think it's a good move. The guy is close to a lifetime .300 hitter ( .295 just last year), and also has a lifetime OBP of .375. He's been hitting better the last few weeks and I think will continue to turn it around. He started slow last year also and batted .320 after the AS break. He supposedly is a great clubhouse guy, can handle the pitchers, and we gave basically nothing up for him. I like the move also.
Definitely overstated it with ecstatic. But I think it's a good move.
 
I remember hearing that Kendall had a crappy rapor with pitchers, called a crappy game and only focused on hitting. I could have sworn I read/heard that somewhere. :goodposting:

 
Definitely overstated it with ecstatic. But I think it's a good move.
I hear you NH. I'm guessing the ecstatic feeling has more to do with the recent streak the Cubbies have been on? We could have acquired Neifi Perez again and I'd still be in a good mood. Okay, well maybe not...
 
Night Hawks said:
Da Beers said:
Definitely overstated it with ecstatic. But I think it's a good move.
I hear you NH. I'm guessing the ecstatic feeling has more to do with the recent streak the Cubbies have been on? We could have acquired Neifi Perez again and I'd still be in a good mood. Okay, well maybe not...
Yeah, I think that was what it was. And easy on the Neifi talk. We're not that crazy yet. :goodposting:
Close though. Y'all are almost ecstatic because you acquired a catcher with a .450 OPS.
 
I remember hearing that Kendall had a crappy rapor with pitchers, called a crappy game and only focused on hitting. I could have sworn I read/heard that somewhere. :thumbup:
All of Oakland's pitchers had nothing but wonderful things to say about his game-calling abilities. I think you might have this bass-ackwards.
 
Terrible debut tonight

0-3

Let a pitchout get by him for a passed ball. Acutally scored a WP, but it was catchable.

Dropped a popup behind home plate in the 8th to the leadoff hitter Molina, who ended up getting a single and being the winning run.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Terrible debut tonight 0-3Let a pitchout get by him for a passed ball. Acutally scored a WP, but it was catchable.Dropped a popup behind home plate in the 8th to the leadoff hitter Molina, who ended up getting a single and being the winning run.
Don't forget the dropped throw from Soriano that might have prevented the tying run :goodposting:
 
Terrible debut tonight 0-3Let a pitchout get by him for a passed ball. Acutally scored a WP, but it was catchable.Dropped a popup behind home plate in the 8th to the leadoff hitter Molina, who ended up getting a single and being the winning run.
This Blevins guy that Chicago gave up looks pretty good. Enjoy the .290 OBP and every single or walk being an automatic double for any hitter with + speed. :bowtie:
 
Terrible debut tonight 0-3Let a pitchout get by him for a passed ball. Acutally scored a WP, but it was catchable.Dropped a popup behind home plate in the 8th to the leadoff hitter Molina, who ended up getting a single and being the winning run.
This Blevins guy that Chicago gave up looks pretty good. Enjoy the .290 OBP and every single or walk being an automatic double for any hitter with + speed. :thumbup:
:goodposting: Enjoy the prospect. There's a new one, an owner trying to address a weakness giving up a prospect. Tonight was a rough one, though.
 
Terrible debut tonight 0-3Let a pitchout get by him for a passed ball. Acutally scored a WP, but it was catchable.Dropped a popup behind home plate in the 8th to the leadoff hitter Molina, who ended up getting a single and being the winning run.
Yeah, pretty rough debut. THat's what I hate the most. Not so much the losses. But the losses that should not have been (at least it should have gone into extra innings.)
 
The Cubs have a history of bringing on past-their-prime catchers.

Benito Santiago

Scott Servais

Jim Sundberg

All came to the Cubs towards the end of their careers.

 
The Cubs have a history of bringing on past-their-prime catchers.Benito SantiagoScott ServaisJim SundbergAll came to the Cubs towards the end of their careers.
:thumbup: WTF do the three listed above have anything to do with current Cubs management ? Talk about going back eons.We are talking about a mid July pickup here, he'll probably only be here a few months.From what I've read (have not checked it out) he has hit about .290 in the last month.Definitely worth a gamble.
 
The Cubs have a history of bringing on past-their-prime catchers.Benito SantiagoScott ServaisJim SundbergAll came to the Cubs towards the end of their careers.
:hot: WTF do the three listed above have anything to do with current Cubs management ? Talk about going back eons.We are talking about a mid July pickup here, he'll probably only be here a few months.From what I've read (have not checked it out) he has hit about .290 in the last month.Definitely worth a gamble.
Last 28 days he's hitting .221Regardless, it's worth the gamble when the other options consist of Koyie Hill (.156), an injured Henry Blanco(.194), and Soto(1/7).Hell, batting .221 he'll will probably look like Roy Campanella back there compared to those hacks.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top