Gottabesweet
Footballguy
Is this guy even on anyone's roster. What about deep dynasty's 40 players non IDP.
Baseball rosters maybe...not football.Is this guy even on anyone's roster. What about deep dynasty's 40 players non IDP.
Second that motion. The cubbies own him.Baseball rosters maybe...not football.Is this guy even on anyone's roster. What about deep dynasty's 40 players non IDP.
Minor League StatsHe's under a 5 year contract with the Cubs with a big signing bonus so it will likely be a few years before the Cubs give up on him.I understand he plays baseball but he is stinking it up in "A" league, Maybe he will give football a chance?
Cecil, how would compare his prospects to say...Maurice Stovall (who appears to be making great strides in TB)? Obviously this is a hypothetical question.The Shark put up some great numbers, but I have doubts about his skill set translating to the pros.
Yes, I would definitely make sure you get this guy if you have the roster spot. I'm taking him, but we have 15 Reserve Spots for Minor Leaguers in our Baseball League and I like taking all young pitchers.Is this guy even on anyone's roster. What about deep dynasty's 40 players non IDP.
I have to agree. I root for Notre Dame and I'm glad we had him but I just don't see him doing much in the NFLThe Shark put up some great numbers, but I have doubts about his skill set translating to the pros.
i don't know how good of a pro WR he would/ or will be, but it looks like he isn't going to sniff the majors as a pitcher. i'm not even looking at the high ERA, or bad won/loss record. those both are subjective. how about only 33 k's in 85 innings. dude has no stuff. thats a major red flag right there. a nearly 23 yr old college pitcher should be able to dominate rookie league hitters a heck of a lot better than that. looks like it shouldn't take him, or the cubs too long to figure this one out.
He hits over 95 mph on his fastball.i don't know how good of a pro WR he would/ or will be, but it looks like he isn't going to sniff the majors as a pitcher. i'm not even looking at the high ERA, or bad won/loss record. those both are subjective. how about only 33 k's in 85 innings. dude has no stuff. thats a major red flag right there. a nearly 23 yr old college pitcher should be able to dominate rookie league hitters a heck of a lot better than that. looks like it shouldn't take him, or the cubs too long to figure this one out.I was never quite sure what the big deal was about him as a pitcher, except that he's a big athletic kid, and maybe they thought once he concentrated on baseball, he would blossom? He certainly did not have the background to justify the kind of hype he got.
IIRC, if the Cubs cut him then they still owe him the money but if he quits then he forfeits the money. He seems intent on giving baseball his best shot and it can take a few years for pitchers to develop so I don't see him quitting and going back to football anytime soon. Even if he does come back to football it's going to take another couple years for him to make much of an impact - by then you'll have been holding onto a guy for 4-5 years. I think your roster would be better served by picking up nearly any rookie still out there. Only in extremely deep leagues (30+ offensive players) does it even make sense to roster him.i don't know how good of a pro WR he would/ or will be, but it looks like he isn't going to sniff the majors as a pitcher. i'm not even looking at the high ERA, or bad won/loss record. those both are subjective. how about only 33 k's in 85 innings. dude has no stuff. thats a major red flag right there. a nearly 23 yr old college pitcher should be able to dominate rookie league hitters a heck of a lot better than that. looks like it shouldn't take him, or the cubs too long to figure this one out.
I've always liked Maurice Stovall (more than Shark), but I am really surprised by the reports out of Tampa. Stovall will always be limited by his lack of speed (and seemingly average athleticism). What Stovall can do is run crisp routes and he uses his great size and strength to overpower defenders. The better route runner he becomes, the more he'll have an impact for the Bucs.JS was fantastic in college, but he always seemed to be just going through the motions.Cecil, how would compare his prospects to say...Maurice Stovall (who appears to be making great strides in TB)? Obviously this is a hypothetical question.The Shark put up some great numbers, but I have doubts about his skill set translating to the pros.
Except for not - don't open or read it if you have a problemShouldn't this be in a different forum? Kind of a pointless topic.
I agree, for those that play dynasty/along with Samar's struggles with baseball, this is far from a useless topic. FBGers are always searching for a needle in a haystack. If you are surface shopping, don't tap in.Except for not - don't open or read it if you have a problemShouldn't this be in a different forum? Kind of a pointless topic.edit to add: this topic has brought great posts.
Please explain. You like Stovall, but are surprised about positive reports? I have heard his speed is a question, but I have heard good things about his athletism (will try to find a link).I've always liked Maurice Stovall (more than Shark), but I am really surprised by the reports out of Tampa. Stovall will always be limited by his lack of speed (and seemingly average athleticism). What Stovall can do is run crisp routes and he uses his great size and strength to overpower defenders. The better route runner he becomes, the more he'll have an impact for the Bucs.JS was fantastic in college, but he always seemed to be just going through the motions.Cecil, how would compare his prospects to say...Maurice Stovall (who appears to be making great strides in TB)? Obviously this is a hypothetical question.The Shark put up some great numbers, but I have doubts about his skill set translating to the pros.![]()
Should've expanded on that thought..Please explain. You like Stovall, but are surprised about positive reports? I have heard his speed is a question, but I have heard good things about his athletism (will try to find a link).I've always liked Maurice Stovall (more than Shark), but I am really surprised by the reports out of Tampa. Stovall will always be limited by his lack of speed (and seemingly average athleticism). What Stovall can do is run crisp routes and he uses his great size and strength to overpower defenders. The better route runner he becomes, the more he'll have an impact for the Bucs.JS was fantastic in college, but he always seemed to be just going through the motions.Cecil, how would compare his prospects to say...Maurice Stovall (who appears to be making great strides in TB)? Obviously this is a hypothetical question.The Shark put up some great numbers, but I have doubts about his skill set translating to the pros.![]()