Cliff Clavin
Footballguy
MoP jUnIoR

I agree, like I said, I have a problem letting it roll of my skin. I have always been trying to get better with that, just sometimes when the obvious unwarrented hate comes out, I cant help it. I again really dont like the confrontaions as much as it may seem.To be honest, I appreciate all the critisizm when its done without the useless mocking and is done in a way that is actually try to point out the faults and help, not make fun of them.This.Generating discussion and putting your neck out by picking sleepers weekly.Taking it personally when people disagree with your picks or (gasp!) mock them.
People mess with you because you tend to behave like you're above criticisim, and to be frank your responses when challenged are often unintentionally comical in their own special way. When someone disagrees, it's either "lol debate 101" from you, or they're "biased," or they're "haters." Somehow nobody ever has a valid counterpoint in your mind. If you're going to run a weekly thread like this you've got to be able to roll with the punches and take a little heat from the SP. If someone disagrees - great, let it be productive discussion. If you really think someone is just "hating" . . . ignore it. These threads could be a lot better for it.
off*I agree, like I said, I have a problem letting it roll of my skin. I have always been trying to get better with that, just sometimes when the obvious unwarrented hate comes out, I cant help it. I again really dont like the confrontaions as much as it may seem.To be honest, I appreciate all the critisizm when its done without the useless mocking and is done in a way that is actually try to point out the faults and help, not make fun of them.This.Generating discussion and putting your neck out by picking sleepers weekly.![]()
Taking it personally when people disagree with your picks or (gasp!) mock them.![]()
People mess with you because you tend to behave like you're above criticisim, and to be frank your responses when challenged are often unintentionally comical in their own special way. When someone disagrees, it's either "lol debate 101" from you, or they're "biased," or they're "haters." Somehow nobody ever has a valid counterpoint in your mind.
If you're going to run a weekly thread like this you've got to be able to roll with the punches and take a little heat from the SP. If someone disagrees - great, let it be productive discussion. If you really think someone is just "hating" . . . ignore it. These threads could be a lot better for it.
Hasselbeck - QB10McCluster - RB49Quarterback – Matt Hasselbeck – Tennessee @ Cleveland
315 Yards and 2 TDs
Running Back – Dexter McCluster – Minnesota @ Kansas City
45 Yards, along with 6 Catches for 50 Yards and 1 TD
Wide Receiver – Titus Young - Detroit @ Dallas
5 receptions for 95 Yards and 1 TD
Tight End – Brent Celek – San Francisco @ Philadelphia
4 receptions for 70 Yards and 1 TD
Kicker – Who cares, it’s a kicker...just make sure you start one.
Defense – Tampa Bay at home against the Indy.
3 sacks, 4 Turnovers, and 13 points allowed
Hope these “Sleepers” help you out, but I’m prolly wrong. Enjoy Week 4 fellas, and good luck in your matchup!
And Hasselbeck was already ~QB12 so it's not exactly shocking that he would end up 10th this week.Hasselbeck - QB10McCluster - RB49Young - WR61Celek - TE56Tampa Bay - DEF30Aside from Hasselbeck, you couldn't have picked worse "sleepers"... JuST CuZ you have the ability to create new topics doesn't mean you should.
X2This.Generating discussion and putting your neck out by picking sleepers weekly.Taking it personally when people disagree with your picks or (gasp!) mock them.
People mess with you because you tend to behave like you're above criticisim, and to be frank your responses when challenged are often unintentionally comical in their own special way. When someone disagrees, it's either "lol debate 101" from you, or they're "biased," or they're "haters." Somehow nobody ever has a valid counterpoint in your mind. If you're going to run a weekly thread like this you've got to be able to roll with the punches and take a little heat from the SP. If someone disagrees - great, let it be productive discussion. If you really think someone is just "hating" . . . ignore it. These threads could be a lot better for it.
I indeed had a bad week....Now do the week before ....ahhh, yes, you wont point that out.Hasselbeck - QB10McCluster - RB49Quarterback – Matt Hasselbeck – Tennessee @ Cleveland
315 Yards and 2 TDs
Running Back – Dexter McCluster – Minnesota @ Kansas City
45 Yards, along with 6 Catches for 50 Yards and 1 TD
Wide Receiver – Titus Young - Detroit @ Dallas
5 receptions for 95 Yards and 1 TD
Tight End – Brent Celek – San Francisco @ Philadelphia
4 receptions for 70 Yards and 1 TD
Kicker – Who cares, it’s a kicker...just make sure you start one.
Defense – Tampa Bay at home against the Indy.
3 sacks, 4 Turnovers, and 13 points allowed
Hope these “Sleepers” help you out, but I’m prolly wrong. Enjoy Week 4 fellas, and good luck in your matchup!
Young - WR61
Celek - TE56
Tampa Bay - DEF30
Aside from Hasselbeck, you couldn't have picked worse "sleepers"... JuST CuZ you have the ability to create new topics doesn't mean you should.
The Week before, since you opened the attacks you stalker. Also, I didnt see the thread with your sleepers Larry?...weird.Apart from the Dalton call, last weeks thread was pretty spot on. Thomas, Moore, Chandler, and Oakland all had good games with stats in the range of his predictions.Agreed. With each week's sleeper thread, post links to previous week's predictions.Good read.it would be great to recap your previous weeks picks to see how you're doing!http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=613194&st=0
I love Just Cuz's topics. Hopefully people in my league see them also and take the terrible advice to heart.
You obviously are hatersas your ignoring how well I did last week and the week before...also, any one can look you up Asop and see what kind of posts you bring to the forum.As you can see, you have much effect on if I continue to post or not.I love Just Cuz's topics. Hopefully people in my league see them also and take the terrible advice to heart.He must get the #### stomped out of him in every league he is in.
Larry's job around here is to point out the dead weight, not to suggest starting it.The Week before, since you opened the attacks you stalker. Also, I didnt see the thread with your sleepers Larry?...weird.Apart from the Dalton call, last weeks thread was pretty spot on. Thomas, Moore, Chandler, and Oakland all had good games with stats in the range of his predictions.Agreed. With each week's sleeper thread, post links to previous week's predictions.Good read.it would be great to recap your previous weeks picks to see how you're doing!http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=613194&st=0
Honestly, I'm just messing with you man. You are one of the most unique posters on these boards... ever... and I mean that in a Corky from Life Goes On meets Randy Savage kinda way.Keep fighting the good fight.The Week before, since you opened the attacks you stalker. Also, I didnt see the thread with your sleepers Larry?...weird.
For someone who is bringing the hate, you sure do like to read all my threads obviously.Let me guess your response..."You want to know who to not start", or " you want to see all the comedy, bahahah" ...funny, your schtick makes you look pathetic and makes your comments predictable, my schtick makes my threads read...so who is the joke really on.man... you guys need to give this guy his props. He picked Matt Stafford to have a good game against the Chiefs. SLEEPER ALERT!!!!!!
enough people. give it a rest.I cant believe I just typed that
Big ups there. He really put it all on the line!man... you guys need to give this guy his props. He picked Matt Stafford to have a good game against the Chiefs. SLEEPER ALERT!!!!!!