Scruff Mcgruff
Footballguy
Who else is starting the old Farg on sunday
100 total yards and a td, i'm calling it now
100 total yards and a td, i'm calling it now
I'm on board, but I'm starting him out of desperation...I hope you're right, I'm not expecting much from him.Who else is starting the old Farg on sunday100 total yards and a td, i'm calling it now
You're wrong. I'm calling it now. I hope this branch supports me.Who else is starting the old Farg on sunday100 total yards and a td, i'm calling it now
100 yards and a TDYou're wrong. I'm calling it now. I hope this branch supports me.Who else is starting the old Farg on sunday100 total yards and a td, i'm calling it now
Is typing "old Farg" easier or better in any way then simply typing Fargas?That aside I think both Jordan and Fargas have a shot at putting up decent numbers. Kiffin would love nothing more then to run the ball 35+ times and against Houston they may have a chance to do that.Who else is starting the old Farg on sunday100 total yards and a td, i'm calling it now
Al?I assume all you Fargas bandwagoneers are not Lamont owners too?
I own both and am paying Lamont. I think he gets back on track this week. Fargas may put up decent numbers too but I gotta roll with Lamont.
When he actually puts up the 100 and a td, he'll deserve a respectable nickname for now he is old fargChaka said:Is typing "old Farg" easier or better in any way then simply typing Fargas?That aside I think both Jordan and Fargas have a shot at putting up decent numbers. Kiffin would love nothing more then to run the ball 35+ times and against Houston they may have a chance to do that.Scruff Mcgruff said:Who else is starting the old Farg on sunday100 total yards and a td, i'm calling it now
Fargas was the better player last week and Lamont has not been the same since the injury.ForWhoForWhat said:I assume all you Fargas bandwagoneers are not Lamont owners too?I own both and am paying Lamont. I think he gets back on track this week. Fargas may put up decent numbers too but I gotta roll with Lamont.
No. For now he is Justin Fargas and if you were paying attention you would know that he already has the built in nickname of Huggy Bear if and when he actually does something on a consistent basis.And I think people are reading to much into Kiffin's statement that Fargas is going to get more playing time. This is a team that wants to run the ball 30-35 times a game (averaging 32) with 5 straight winnable games on the schedule and 6 of 8 overall so they will have every opportunity to implement their game plan. With those numbers there are plenty of carries to go around between Fargas and Lamont, who is still the starter and will receive 2/3 of those carries and Fargas will still see a bump in his season average of 7 carries per game.Dominic Rhodes is the odd man out in Raider Land.When he actually puts up the 100 and a td, he'll deserve a respectable nickname for now he is old fargIs typing "old Farg" easier or better in any way then simply typing Fargas?That aside I think both Jordan and Fargas have a shot at putting up decent numbers. Kiffin would love nothing more then to run the ball 35+ times and against Houston they may have a chance to do that.Who else is starting the old Farg on sunday100 total yards and a td, i'm calling it now
Translation: "Lamont Jordan will start and get 25-30 carries"(Rotoworld) Raiders coach Lane Kiffin says Justin Fargas' role in the Raiders' backfield will increase going forward.
Well if you hate to say it...then don't.However, with Gore being a last minute scratch, I jumped on the Huggy Bear Jr bandwagon & plugged him in instead. Boy am I ever glad that I did.Hate to say I told you so.
No you don't.Hate to say I told you so.
No you don't.Hate to say I told you so.
About what? Your incorrect 100 total yards and a TD prediction? So close, yet so far away.(He actually won a game for me this weekend. Big fan. Tough to expect the same going forward, though)Scruff Mcgruff said:Hate to say I told you so.
Who's going to keep riding the Fargas bandwagon vs Chicago? I can tell you the Chicago D is not the same D as last year's...About what? Your incorrect 100 total yards and a TD prediction? So close, yet so far away.(He actually won a game for me this weekend. Big fan. Tough to expect the same going forward, though)Scruff Mcgruff said:Hate to say I told you so.
Who's going to keep riding the Fargas bandwagon vs Chicago? I can tell you the Chicago D is not the same D as last year's...About what? Your incorrect 100 total yards and a TD prediction? So close, yet so far away.(He actually won a game for me this weekend. Big fan. Tough to expect the same going forward, though)Scruff Mcgruff said:Hate to say I told you so.
Arg... I'm in the same boat brother...3C said:mistersmith said:Who's going to keep riding the Fargas bandwagon vs Chicago? I can tell you the Chicago D is not the same D as last year's...Bob Sacamano said:About what? Your incorrect 100 total yards and a TD prediction? So close, yet so far away.(He actually won a game for me this weekend. Big fan. Tough to expect the same going forward, though)Scruff Mcgruff said:Hate to say I told you so.With LJ going down I might have to.
Depends on Gore's ankle.Who's going to keep riding the Fargas bandwagon vs Chicago? I can tell you the Chicago D is not the same D as last year's...About what? Your incorrect 100 total yards and a TD prediction? So close, yet so far away.(He actually won a game for me this weekend. Big fan. Tough to expect the same going forward, though)Hate to say I told you so.