Fennis
Footballguy
Sandra Bullock was really good in thatIsn't this just an episode from Blindspot?
Sandra Bullock was really good in thatIsn't this just an episode from Blindspot?
The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.
Not sure why anybody would be foolish enough to believe that we don't do the same terrible things to others that they do to us.The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.
I'll make civilians a deal - stop joining organizations created to plan attacks against the U.S. and I'll stop dropping bombs on you.The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.
I'll make civilians a deal - stop joining organizations created to plan attacks against the U.S. and I'll stop dropping bombs on you.The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.
I'll make civilians a deal - stop joining organizations created to plan attacks against the U.S. and I'll stop dropping bombs on you.The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.
IMO there's no other way to fight this type of threat without accepting civilian deaths.I'll make civilians a deal - stop joining organizations created to plan attacks against the U.S. and I'll stop dropping bombs on you.The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.I don't think you understand the term "civilian"...
You know - we could probably stop a lot of gang violence in the US if we can just accept a few civilian casualties...IMO there's no other way to fight this type of threat without accepting civilian deaths.I'll make civilians a deal - stop joining organizations created to plan attacks against the U.S. and I'll stop dropping bombs on you.The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.I don't think you understand the term "civilian"...
And before you know it, Skynet will become self-aware.Stupid to introduce to begin with. Anyone with any vision knows that within ten years the enemy has it, and then it's a war of escalation and exponential killing machines.
The problem with "drone assassination program" isn't the "drone" part.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.
Nothing at all. Small forces of highly-specialized units like the Rangers to get embedded in local communities delivering Intel to CIA to perform local extractions/eliminations. When it mattered (UBL) we had no problem doing this.AnonymousBob said:I'm not sure what's wrong with choosing none of the above.cstu said:A ground invasion is far more detrimental in term of breeding new terrorists. Drone attacks that kill innocents do encourage people to become terrorists, but seeing an armed invading force walking through your neighborhood and knocking down door does it even more.Clifford said:This is not the first I have heard of us literally not knowing who we are shooting so it's not news really.If you think about the limitations of technology it's common sense:1. I'm not seeing this reported anywhere else yet. Doesn't mean it's false but I'm a tad hesitant to give it significant credibility based upon that link to a shoddy site with no mention of where it came from.
2. If true, is this news? We've been slaughtering folk with drones for some time. We think they're not operating with some sort of hit list? Americans appear to be okay with it.
IOW drone warfare is only acceptable if you accept the fact that about 2-3 times out of ten you'll be killing innocent people. And that's balanced against the inherent risk of ground troops.From a long-term strategic perspective, we are picking off a few terrorists and breeding somewhere in the neighborhood of 20-30 per attack. Nothing could be more detrimental to our longterm objectives (if in fact the long term objective is peace) than using drones to take out terrorists.
- We are tracking using satellite imaging, so it's a cross-reference of what little info we really have, and a look alike game
- As good as our cameras are, all we really know is that there is someone who looks like a terrorist in the vicinity of the last known location of the terrorist in or around people/things believed to be linked to a terrorist network
- Now think about what that really is: looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, must be a duck
Yeah, the problem is we don't do enough of it. After 9-11 we should have sent special forces in and cut the heads off the snakes through out the ME. We should have sent a message that you support terrorists you pay the ultimate price.Is collateral damage desirable? Absolutley not. But it is not a new thing. War is hell and wherever possible we need to try avoid it but it is not realistic to think it is always avoidable, especially when the enemy is a civilian who is operating as a terrorist and not putting on a nation's uniform.CBusAlex said:The problem with "drone assassination program" isn't the "drone" part.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.
You should go back to supporting the Westboro Baptist Church guys and proclaiming David Duke an American hero. Leave the adult conversations to the adults.I'll make civilians a deal - stop joining organizations created to plan attacks against the U.S. and I'll stop dropping bombs on you.The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.![]()
Sadly, civilians are killed in every war. The difference with this war and many others is that not everyone is wearing uniforms.The outrage is because they are used to kill civilians. A similar attack in the US would be called terrorism.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.
Drones supposedly are used for more surgical strikes but the targets wised up and now hide among civilians. People holding the triggers often have to sacrifice innocent lives to make the important hits. Who knows how reliable is the intel.The problem with "drone assassination program" isn't the "drone" part.A drone is just another weapon in our military arsenal. One that happens to help keep our soldiers safe. I think drones are a great idea, but like any weapon of course there is the potential for misuse. I don't get the paranoia and outrage over them. I'm sure i'll get crucified for those comments but whatever.