smackdaddies
Footballguy
While the Pack played their some of their starters 1 series (TD), KC played theirs for a half, some most of the game.
Overall, KC looked bad. Turnovers all night. Barely moved the ball against 2nd, 3rd and 4th stringers. Last year kc looked good in the preseason, had a fine year. This year, sucked in preseason - make your own judgement on the upcoming regular season. Personally, I wouldn't be counting on a lot. D let Packers starters roll them, looked good against the scrubs.
Packers starting offense looked good for their one offensive series. Grant was the starter, Stark the 3rd down back. 2nd and 3rd team offense looked bad.
Pack D looked good. Tons of turnovers. Considering it was 2nd and 3rd team D playing 1st team offense for much of the game, looked great. So Oto looks a little big and stiff, but had a great game.
Basically the Pack played backups the whole game (JFin, Jennings, Nelson, Jones, Mathews all did not dress), Rodgers/Grant/Stark played one series
Overall, KC looked bad. Turnovers all night. Barely moved the ball against 2nd, 3rd and 4th stringers. Last year kc looked good in the preseason, had a fine year. This year, sucked in preseason - make your own judgement on the upcoming regular season. Personally, I wouldn't be counting on a lot. D let Packers starters roll them, looked good against the scrubs.
Packers starting offense looked good for their one offensive series. Grant was the starter, Stark the 3rd down back. 2nd and 3rd team offense looked bad.
Pack D looked good. Tons of turnovers. Considering it was 2nd and 3rd team D playing 1st team offense for much of the game, looked great. So Oto looks a little big and stiff, but had a great game.
Basically the Pack played backups the whole game (JFin, Jennings, Nelson, Jones, Mathews all did not dress), Rodgers/Grant/Stark played one series