'Red Herring said:
I love flip flopping them around... As for TE, I don't think you can afford not to have a graham/gronk, maybe AHern or Gates depending on matchup. ITs just too big an advantage to give away
This. Spend the money on a premium TE each week.
Its all relative. Spend big money in a TE and you really need to find value at WR3. Bottom line is to try to outscore your opponents entire starting lineup, not individual positions.
Therein lies the rub. You can find value at WR3, but there really isn't any value at TE. EG this week: Garcon & lloyd @ 6000, Wayne @ 6300, Harvin @ 6600, Thomas @ 6700, & Smiff @ 6800 all have a great shot (IMHO) at high WR1 #s (lets call that top 6) and out-scoring their top 6-8 (the 7k and above club) this week.
However, looking at TE, who is a value pick with a great chance at outpointing you if you take one of those top 4 (6400-7500), or especially the top 2? The only one I see this week is Gonzo @ 5400, and I'm not personally awful confident in that one.
I get what youre saying here, but lets look at 2 made up rosters - one with a value WR3, and one with a value TE. Team one players are in my lineup this week, team 2 was picked based on what a starting lineup might have looked like last week using the Stud TE/value WR3 strategy.Team one:
A Johnson ($7500)
V Cruz ($7000)
R Wayne ($6300)
Pettigrew ($5700, the #7 TE, which I consider to be a "value" TE pick)
Cost: $26,500
Team two:
Calvin Johnson ($8400)
Fitz ($7700)
S Holmes ($5700)
Gronk ($7500)
Cost: $29,300
Team one scored 59 points, team 2 scored 45 in week one. Will team 1 outscore team 2 in week two? Maybe, maybe not. Im not saying it will always happen that way, just that it
can and does sometimes.
You could swap out Holmes for players like S Rice, DeSean Jackson, Decker, (all cost more than Holmes) and still have less points than team one (and yes, you could probably pick a few that cost less than Holmes that scored nice, but no names jumped out at me on the list below him that I would have felt comfy as my WR3.)
Now, its just as easy to throw out a bunch of
different players to prove the exact opposite - It all depends on the week and how it plays out. My point is both strategies do in fact work, and neither way has an advantage over the other, IMO. Its hit and miss as to which strategy will work any given week, so I just go by my gut feeling and dont stick to one strategy or the other.