What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

London Mosque Attack (1 Viewer)

I assume the driver was arrested. Is that something they do automatically in an event like this or is it confirmation that it was more than just an accident?

 
I asked you what the whole s sentence meant, but if you are going to act like a 4year old, stay out of the thread and let the adults talk
A 4 year old would ask what does "gee" mean. It means attacks on England are growing and we are starting to get use to it. The terrorists are winning. Why is that? Why is this happening? I'm clueless. Please tell me.

 
This is sad. Nobody wins. If true, wouldn't this be akin to doing the terrorists work. Since extremists see moderates as infidels as well?
It was a terrorist attack....  so yes it's doing terrorist work, because terrorists did it.

 
A 4 year old would ask what does "gee" mean. It means attacks on England are growing and we are starting to get use to it. The terrorists are winning. Why is that? Why is this happening? I'm clueless. Please tell me.
One thing I can think of is because they undermined their own sovereignty by allowing sharia law to operate within their borders.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It was a terrorist attack....  so yes it's doing terrorist work, because terrorists did it.
True. It's a terrorist attack regardless of who perpetrates the act. But, it looks like this was a strike against Muslims in retaliation for the London Bridge attack. However, the people that were killed tonight are not extremists. It's throwing the baby out with the bathwater. 

 
This is sad. Nobody wins. If true, wouldn't this be akin to doing the terrorists work. Since extremists see moderates as infidels as well?
Now some reports saying this was a mosque used in past for recruiting extremists in the past and was also home of the notorious one eyed cleric. If so this all is beginning to add up. 

 
 A man will kill someone for almost any reason. We have experienced thousands of years of war and most had nothing to do with religion. 
It would certainly be the first and likely largest step towards eliminating war. Many of the largest in history were directly religiously influenced. It is the prime breeding ground for ignorance that leads to other causes of war.

 
Now some reports saying this was a mosque used in past for recruiting extremists in the past and was also home of the notorious one eyed cleric. If so this all is beginning to add up. 
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/finsbury-park-mosque-opens-doors-new-era-after-expelling-extremists-n305626

Apparently this mosque was the former mosque of Richard Reid, Abu Hamza, and Zacarias Moussaoui.  Would seem to have to be one hell of a coincidence for this to happen at this particular mosque.

 
It would certainly be the first and likely largest step towards eliminating war. Many of the largest in history were directly religiously influenced. It is the prime breeding ground for ignorance that leads to other causes of war.
South Park already covered this.  People will just find another reason to kill each other.

 
Yes of course but not on such scale
WW1, WW2, American  Civil War, Korean War, Vietnam War, Spanish Civil War, Boer Wars, Russo-Japanese War, etc.  Men have done a fine job finding non religious reasons to kill each other over the last 150 years.

 
WW1, WW2, American  Civil War, Korean War, Vietnam War, Spanish Civil War, Boer Wars, Russo-Japanese War, etc.  Men have done a fine job finding non religious reasons to kill each other over the last 150 years.
Those are within the last 100 years. I think we should take in to account technology,and inexperience with it, when measuring the loss of life in those conflicts. Now we have apparently reached an equilibrium where we are living in the most peaceful times in regards to war. The only apparent threat to that level of peace, at the moment, is religious conflict.

Before modern war there was nearly 2000 years of documented religious conflict and mankind is now regressing in that regard. Perhaps the answer isn't " man will always find a reason to fight" but that " man will always find a god to kill for".

Im slightly drunk and it's entirely possible I'm making little to no sense but that's how I feel.

 
Those are within the last 100 years. I think we should take in to account technology,and inexperience with it, when measuring the loss of life in those conflicts. Now we have apparently reached an equilibrium where we are living in the most peaceful times in regards to war. The only apparent threat to that level of peace, at the moment, is religious conflict.

Before modern war there was nearly 2000 years of documented religious conflict and mankind is now regressing in that regard. Perhaps the answer isn't " man will always find a reason to fight" but that " man will always find a god to kill for".

Im slightly drunk and it's entirely possible I'm making little to no sense but that's how I feel.
Religion has rarely been the major cause of wars throughout history. Most wars were for territorial conquest, to secure borders and trade routes, or political control. The same threats to peace exist today in many parts of the world. Money, land, influence, power. All of these idiots that keep driving vehicles into crowds have none of those things and they never will.

 
Thread title should be changed to 

White Terror Attack in London!

When you have a mayor who usually responds with "we aren't going to speculate" quickly after these incidents use strong language like police were responding to a "horrific terrorist attack." it can only mean it was a white islamaphobe racist who killed innocent muslim(s).
 

 
Thread title should be changed to 

White Terror Attack in London!

When you have a mayor who usually responds with "we aren't going to speculate" quickly after these incidents use strong language like police were responding to a "horrific terrorist attack." it can only mean it was a white islamaphobe racist who killed innocent muslim(s).
 
People who think like you do are one of the major reasons why we can't come together in this country.  Yes, of course, liberals love it when white guys commit crimes like this so the attention is off of Muslims for a moment.  We just can't wait to destroy western culture in favor of Sharia law.  So stupid it's almost difficult to believe, but then you post again just reaffirming it all. 

 
Odd that a terror attack is only sitting at 2 pages and half of those are drunken ramblings. These things usually are blowing up with "religion of peace" hot takes and the like.

 
Unfortunately these sort of reprisal attacks (if that is what this is), are exactly what the islamic extremists want (and need) to get the general muslim populace on their side. This moron actually hurt his cause and helped ISIS with this stunt. 

idiots.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top