Henry and Taylor ADP is 17th Bradford 14th.That's pretty deep.I would not consider these guys deep sleepers.
32 team league?I would not consider these guys deep sleepers.
So you are saying the vikes #1a and a Mike Martz #2 receiver are deep sleepers? Ok. They are both on rosters in my 10 team league. When I think deep sleeper I think of someone off the radar not just lower ranked receivers.32 team league?I would not consider these guys deep sleepers.
Yeah OKHenry will have 10 TDs this year.![]()
Lets hope soMartz in Detroit screams Bradford has a real shot at making a top-20 fantasy receiver.
Bradford looked surprisingly good in the preseason. Henry did too, but he's, well, Chris Henry. Have to go with Bradford on this one. If you want a deeep sleeper from detroit though, keep your eye on Eddie Drummond.
Why is that so impossible? Stokely did that in a comparable offense with Indy in 04. Henry is closer to option WR2B rather than a WR3. He's a better deep threat than Housh. He had 6 TDs last year as a rookie.Brassmonkey71 said:Yeah OKHenry will have 10 TDs this year.![]()
![]()
50 muffed punts and 6 lost fumbles?Bobby Wade -- TitansI'm going to bet that he gets about 50 and 6 this year.
I think he meant 50 yards and 6 catches.50 muffed punts and 6 lost fumbles?Bobby Wade -- TitansI'm going to bet that he gets about 50 and 6 this year.Sounds about right to me. *Bears homer*
You think he'll get that close to matching last year's production?I think he meant 50 yards and 6 catches.50 muffed punts and 6 lost fumbles?Bobby Wade -- TitansI'm going to bet that he gets about 50 and 6 this year.Sounds about right to me. *Bears homer*
Well, it's his second year in the system, so I think a little bit of improvement should be expected.You think he'll get that close to matching last year's production?I think he meant 50 yards and 6 catches.50 muffed punts and 6 lost fumbles?Bobby Wade -- TitansI'm going to bet that he gets about 50 and 6 this year.Sounds about right to me. *Bears homer*
update bump. Henry has 6 tds so far. He has 4 Tds in the last 5 games. If he can stay out of trouble for the rest of the season, he's a very good option. As an aside, the breathalyzer in his case was thrown out, although the case is still ongoing.Why is that so impossible? Stokely did that in a comparable offense with Indy in 04. Henry is closer to option WR2B rather than a WR3. He's a better deep threat than Housh. He had 6 TDs last year as a rookie.Yeah OKHenry will have 10 TDs this year.![]()
![]()
He's been real good this season. Excluding Week 1 he has been productive in every game he's played this season except one. For a No. 3 WR that's very impressive in my opinion. He's got big-time talent and Palmer loves throwing to him and with so much talent around him at WR he'll see single coverage week in and week out. Plus his size gives him a huge advantage in the Red Zone. As stated above, Henry is more WR2B than a WR3. But he's a legit fantasy starter.update bump. Henry has 6 tds so far. He has 4 Tds in the last 5 games. If he can stay out of trouble for the rest of the season, he's a very good option. As an aside, the breathalyzer in his case was thrown out, although the case is still ongoing.Why is that so impossible? Stokely did that in a comparable offense with Indy in 04. Henry is closer to option WR2B rather than a WR3. He's a better deep threat than Housh. He had 6 TDs last year as a rookie.Yeah OKHenry will have 10 TDs this year.![]()
![]()
best posting in the entire thread - by far.What about Colston? He just moved up to #2 for the Saints, and I would say Brees definitely has more potential than Kitna or Johnson.
Just noticed this thread is months old.... guess my post is pretty pointless.best posting in the entire thread - by far.What about Colston? He just moved up to #2 for the Saints, and I would say Brees definitely has more potential than Kitna or Johnson.
Emphasis on the "s"this thread is months old