What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Looking into my postseason "crystal ball"... (1 Viewer)

Am I the only one who's giving the Eagles' ground game its props?  Also, they have a good defense against the run, so it will be tough for Ingram and Kamara to gain yards in the Divisional Playoff as well.
You've mentioned Blount a few times in this thread but he hasn't exactly been a big factor for the Eagles in quite some time now.  He's not even the same RB that he was in NE.  :shrug:  

 
Am I the only one who's giving the Eagles' ground game its props?  Also, they have a good defense against the run, so it will be tough for Ingram and Kamara to gain yards in the Divisional Playoff as well.
Even with Blount and Ajayi, PHI averaged 50 fewer rushing yards per game in December than they did in their first 11 games. Dropping from 147 yards and change to 98 yards per game. Defensively, they've allowed 110 yards per game vs. 65 yds/gm the first 11 weeks. Both of those are trending in the wrong direction. And they haven't faced a backfield like Ingram and Kamara.

 
Another thing I took into consideration was that the Eagles instantly vaulted into a Super Bowl contender when they acquired Jay Ajayi at midseason.  Team him with LeGarrette Blount, and that's a hard RB duo to stop.  I know the Saints have Ingram and Kamara, but Blount and Ajayi are the best 1-2 duo that the Eagles have had at RB ever.  Not to mention Blount was the key ingredient that led to the Patriots Super Bowl win last year.
The 2009 Eagles had Westbrook and McCoy.  That was pretty damn good too. 

 
Even with Blount and Ajayi, PHI averaged 50 fewer rushing yards per game in December than they did in their first 11 games. Dropping from 147 yards and change to 98 yards per game. Defensively, they've allowed 110 yards per game vs. 65 yds/gm the first 11 weeks. Both of those are trending in the wrong direction. And they haven't faced a backfield like Ingram and Kamara.
Can't remember where I heard this, but apparently one of Wentz's underappreciated talents was pre-snap reads. In other words, the running game did better when he was under center because he set them up for success.

Of course, there's also the more straightforward effect where the running game performs worse because teams no longer have to worry about an MVP candidate destroying them through the air and can get away with stacking the box.

 
The 2009 Eagles had Westbrook and McCoy.  That was pretty damn good too. 
In terms of talent, maybe. But one was a vet at the tail end of his career and the other was a rookie. They combined for less than 1,500 YFS that year.

Then again, Ajayi and Blount only had 1,200 this year.

I think the moral of the story is that the Eagles have never had much RB depth.

 
In terms of talent, maybe. But one was a vet at the tail end of his career and the other was a rookie. They combined for less than 1,500 YFS that year.

Then again, Ajayi and Blount only had 1,200 this year.

I think the moral of the story is that the Eagles have never had much RB depth.
Agreed. And throw in Clemons and they are really solid.  :thumbup:   But like the poster above mentioned, if they have zero fear of Foles, it's not hard to stop the run. 

 
Can't remember where I heard this, but apparently one of Wentz's underappreciated talents was pre-snap reads. In other words, the running game did better when he was under center because he set them up for success.

Of course, there's also the more straightforward effect where the running game performs worse because teams no longer have to worry about an MVP candidate destroying them through the air and can get away with stacking the box.
This somewhat applies to Brady too and his sudden end of season "decline." Yes, he had more INTs and fewer completions, and people have pointed to him throwing for fewer yards. But the Pats took what was available and had 3 December games with almost 200 yards rushing. Yards are yards, points are points, and wins are wins.It's a quarterback's job to move the ball.

Put another way, the Patriots are a whopping 54-1 when they rush for 150 yards with Brady at QB since he came to town. So the Patriots probably don't care if Brady throws for fewer yards when they can run the football.

 
This somewhat applies to Brady too and his sudden end of season "decline." Yes, he had more INTs and fewer completions, and people have pointed to him throwing for fewer yards. But the Pats took what was available and had 3 December games with almost 200 yards rushing. Yards are yards, points are points, and wins are wins.It's a quarterback's job to move the ball.

Put another way, the Patriots are a whopping 54-1 when they rush for 150 yards with Brady at QB since he came to town. So the Patriots probably don't care if Brady throws for fewer yards when they can run the football.
I agree but MVP voting almost always comes down to pretty stats.   Under Bill Cowher the Steelers had a ridiculous record when the team rushed for more than 100 yards but no one was clamoring for MVP awards for Neil O'Donnell, Mike Tomczak and Kordell Stewart.  

Brady's overall numbers for the 2017 season are good enough to qualify for MVP consideration but if you're going to use them you have to acknowledge they were pretty pedestrian in the second half of the season.  And let's not forget that in season's past Brady & Belichick have always had the reputation of running up the score via the air whether they had a running game or not.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree but MVP scoring almost always comes down to pretty stats.   Under Bill Cowher the Steelers had a ridiculous record when the team rushed for more than 100 yards but no one was clamoring for MVP awards for Neil O'Donnell, Mike Tomczak and Kordell Stewart.  

Brady's overall numbers for the 2017 season are good enough to qualify for MVP consideration but if you're going to use them you have to acknowledge they were pretty pedestrian in the second half of the season.  And let's not forget that in season's past Brady & Belichick have always had the reputation of running up the score via the air whether they had a running game or not.
As I mentioned in the MVP thread, Brady is probably banged up but look at what he had to deal with this year . . .

No Edelman or Mitchell all year. Only half a year of Hogan. Gronk out for a couple games (and essentially written out of the game plan for Week 17). Burkhead missed 6 games and White was dinged down the stretch. All of the fill ins did close to nothing (Bennett, Dorsett, Britt).

The O line had its own issues. Marcus Cannon missed half the year and went on IR. Sebastian Vollmer retired. Cameron Fleming missed a quarter of the season. Nate Solder was banged up the entire season. Brady got hit and sacked a ton this year.

So sure, they ended up relying on the run more because they had a bunch of guys hurt. But they still won. And Brady still put up big numbers early to mid season (which has been his M.O. most of his career . . . great early on, average later in the regular season). He still was at or near the top in all the traditional QB categories this year and the more modern analytical ones as well. Does it really matter what performances occurred when? The total numbers are the same no matter when the games were played. And Brady still did best at the end of games when it mattered to pull out wins.

This year, more than others, the Pats got the lead and went pretty conservative and didn't try to pile on the points late in games. They were more interested in keeping people healthy and running the clock. They had 8 wins where they had double digit leads in the second half. Ten years ago they would have tried to win by 30. Not so much this time around. Does having a big lead and not throwing as much hurt a QB's playoff chances? He still led the league in passing yards.

 
Wild Card:

Bills>Jags

Chiefs>Titans

Rams>Falcons

Saints>Panthers

Division:

Pats>Bills

Steelers>Chiefs

Saints>Eagles

Vikings>Rams

Conference:

Pats>Steelers

Vikings>Saints

Super Bowl:

Vikings>Pats

 
Am I the only one who thinks the Panthers can beat the saints?

They have the manpower to limit the run, double Thomas and make Coleman/Ginn beat you

If Cam is on, the Panthers are going to steal this one
If Cam is on sure. Panthers are nearly unbeatable if his throws are on and he is running. Cam also has a completion % of 52, 41, and 39% 3 of his last 7 games. Not really feeling confident with those numbers.

 
As I mentioned in the MVP thread, Brady is probably banged up but look at what he had to deal with this year . . .

No Edelman or Mitchell all year. Only half a year of Hogan. Gronk out for a couple games (and essentially written out of the game plan for Week 17). Burkhead missed 6 games and White was dinged down the stretch. All of the fill ins did close to nothing (Bennett, Dorsett, Britt).

The O line had its own issues. Marcus Cannon missed half the year and went on IR. Sebastian Vollmer retired. Cameron Fleming missed a quarter of the season. Nate Solder was banged up the entire season. Brady got hit and sacked a ton this year.

So sure, they ended up relying on the run more because they had a bunch of guys hurt. But they still won. And Brady still put up big numbers early to mid season (which has been his M.O. most of his career . . . great early on, average later in the regular season). He still was at or near the top in all the traditional QB categories this year and the more modern analytical ones as well. Does it really matter what performances occurred when? The total numbers are the same no matter when the games were played. And Brady still did best at the end of games when it mattered to pull out wins.

This year, more than others, the Pats got the lead and went pretty conservative and didn't try to pile on the points late in games. They were more interested in keeping people healthy and running the clock. They had 8 wins where they had double digit leads in the second half. Ten years ago they would have tried to win by 30. Not so much this time around. Does having a big lead and not throwing as much hurt a QB's playoff chances? He still led the league in passing yards.
As I said Brady's stats are good enough to make him a worthy MVP candidate so I'm not sure why we need to make excuses for him.  All players have to deal with injuries to teammates and situations that affected their performances that may have been beyond their control.   Why should Brady get a pass and no one else?

Bottom line is Brady's second half stats weren't anything to write home about.  I'm not saying that should disqualify him for MVP because his team won but it should be a factor when considering him for MVP verses other players.

 
It's time for me to make my postseason forecast and projected winner of Super Bowl LII.  Well, we all know it's hard to win on the road in the playoffs, so I give somewhat of an advantage to the home teams:

AFC Wild Card Playoff: Chiefs over Titans

NFC Wild Card Playoff: Rams over Falcons

AFC Wild Card Playoff: Jaguars over Bills

NFC Wild Card Playoff: Saints over Panthers

NFC Divisional Playoff: Eagles over Saints

AFC Divisional Playoff: Patriots over Chiefs

AFC Divisional Playoff: Steelers over Jaguars

NFC Divisional Playoff: Vikings over Rams

AFC Championship: Patriots over Steelers

NFC Championship: Eagles over Vikings (Yes, I'm already breaking the hearts of the people in Minnesota who want their team to be the first to host a Super Bowl in their own stadium!)

So, now we got a rematch of Super Bowl XXXIX set up between the Eagles and the Patriots.  Here's what I see happening.  It will be the longest game in NFL history, even longer than the Christmas Day special played in 1971 between the Dolphins and the Chiefs.  I see the game going at least into double overtime with both teams scoring at least 24 points apiece.  But, I'm having trouble picking a winner.  Could someone help me determine the outcome?
I kind of agree with all this except I think Min makes it to the SB.

FWIW, it wouldn't shock me if KC beat NE and or Jac beat Pit (especially if ab out) with the latter slightly more likely imho.

 
Personally I agree with most of your calls but think the Bills upset the Jags and the Eagles getting knocked out in the divisional round.
Anything is possible but without McCoy how do you think this happens? Do the bills D get a few pick 6s? 

 
Hasnt cam only thrown like 1 td in the last 2 games?  Hard to see them winning a road playoff game.  That's worse than foles production.  Actually as an eagles fan, I really hope Carolina ends up making it to us somehow

 
Last edited by a moderator:
defenses win champhionships right???

AFC Wild Card Playoff: Chiefs over Titans

NFC Wild Card Playoff: Rams 

AFC Wild Card Playoff: Jaguars

NFC Wild Card Playoff: Panthers

NFC Divisional Playoff: Panthers over eagles

AFC Divisional Playoff: Patriots over chiefs

AFC Divisional Playoff: Jags clobber steelers like they did in Oct.

NFC Divisional Playoff: Vikings clobber Rams

AFC Championship: Jags pound the Pats with defense.

NFC Championship: Vikings over Panthers in a close one

Vikings V Jags

Vikings win SB..

those who think the Panthers wont win in N.O. are the same ones saying Saints will win in Philly the following week. .In cold January.outdoors. NOT happening..N.O. is a good story this season, but Carolina is peaking at the right time...ya need to check the Saints' record outdoors in cold weather, esp in playoffs ...no bueno.. 

Pats wont beat a Tom Coughlin Jaguars team. Steelers wont beat Jags either. you worry about Bortles but if i'm NE I'm worried about Jags run game, their WR's, and the ferocious defense..

I CANNOT believe how many Vikings non-believers there are in here.wow.they're the BEST team in the NFL bar none.they play indoors throughout the playoffs ( yes, I'm summarily dismissing the Eagles and any chance they have of even winning a game - they're 1-n-done).Vikings have been better and have been flying under the radar all season long..

I dont get it. Keenum has been playing lights out..usually when a guy gets on a streak like that, it continues..and that defense hits hard.

and Jags might have the best defense since Denver couple years back, or Legion of Boom.they're playing at a historically great level . 

if there's one thing that could happen is that NE could be a bit iffy vs. Chiefs ..you saw a glimpse of this last season with the Texans in the Div round..Chiefs will give them fits.

but Andy Reid doesn't win playoff games, like, ever.so there's that..

 
In recent years, top tier QB’s win in the post season. That chart of projected outcomes would be radically different than the defensive one. 

 
Anything is possible but without McCoy how do you think this happens? Do the bills D get a few pick 6s? 
Dunno, just a feeling that Jax is primed for a let down.

Interestingly (or not... whatever) I think Jax has the best shot of upsetting the Pats if they make it past Buffalo.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Disclaimer:

These are 100% correct
AFC Wild Card: Chiefs over Titans - How much does it really count when your only two wins against playoff teams this year are both against Blake Bortles?

AFC Wild Card: Jaguars over Bills - It seems like every season, there's a real mediocre AFC wild card team that sneaks in, gets hammered, and we watch every minute of that totally forgettable game, because playoff football baby! Anyways, this year we seem to be blessed with TWO such games. Truly the NFL gods have smiled down upon us. Shark move here is to root for the Bills in hopes of more dildo-throwing at the ensuing BUF/NE game, but that could be asking for a bit much.

NFC Wild Card: Saints over Panthers - Jerry Richardson is an ###.

NFC Wild Card: Rams over Falcons - Besides my homer team (KC) losing in the first round, the Falcons winning here would be the most upsetting outcome of wildcard weekend. The Rams are young and fun. The Falcons are not.

AFC Divisional: Patriots over Chiefs - LOL, this again. The AFC playoffs slogan since, like, 2004.

AFC Divisional: Steelers over Jaguars - If the Jags pull this off, shut off the TV and don't watch another game all year. Nothing will top the incredible Brown/Bell/Ben/JuJu juggernaut falling to Blake Bortles. 

NFC Divisional: Saints over Eagles - They absolutely suck without Wentz.

NFC Divisional: Vikings over Rams - Will be hard to beat an elite, rested defense. I think this is where the LA gravy train comes to a stop.

AFC Championship: Patriots over Steelers - #######it

NFC Championship: Saints over Vikings - Look, I don't want a Case Keenum vs. Tom Brady super bowl. That doesn't even give me a shred of hope that the Pats will lose. I at least want a healthy dose of delusion before Darth Hoodie steps in and ruins the entire ####### season. 28-3, that was the good stuff.

Super Bowl: Saints over Patriots - Suck it!

I need to go to bed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Records of playoff teams vs other playoff teams & vs non playoff teams

Patriots: 5-2 (1 loss to non playoff teams) (vs miami in week 14) 
Steelers: 3-2 (1 loss to non playoff teams) (vs chicago in week 3)
Jaguars: 1-3 (3 losses to non playoff teams)
Chiefs: 2-2 (4 losses to non playoff teams) 
Titans: 2-2 (5 losses to non playoff teams)
Bills: 2-4 (3 losses to non playoff teams)

Eagles: 2-1 (2 losses to non playoff teams)
Vikings: 3-2 (1 loss to non playoff teams) (vs detroit in week 4)
Rams: 3-2 (3 losses to non playoff teams) 
Saints: 4-4 (1 loss to non playoff teams) (vs tampa in week 17)
Panthers: 4-4 (1 loss to non playoff teams) (vs chicago in week 7)
Falcons: 2-5 (1 loss to non playoff teams) (vs miami in week 6)

Records in games where they did NOT force more than 1 turnover:

Patriots: 8-2
Steelers: 8-2
Jaguars: 3-4
Chiefs: 3-6
Titans: 4-6
Bills: 3-6

Eagles: 4-3
Vikings: 6-3
Rams: 3-3
Saints: 7-3
Panthers: 6-5
Falcons: 5-6

The Patriots are obviously the class of the NFL.  Its the NFC that is murky.

Jaguars over Bills
Chiefs over Titans
Steelers over Jaguars
Patriots over Chiefs
Patriots over Steelers

Rams over Falcons
Saints over Panthers
Saints over Eagles
Vikings over Rams
Saints over Vikings

Patriots over Saints

 
Just give me a SB without the Steelers or Pats this year, thanks.
The Steelers, Patriots, and Broncos have collectively represented the AFC in just under half of ALL super bowls ever. Steelers 8 times, Patriots 9 times, Broncos 8 times for a total of 25 out of 51 super bowls.  If the Patriots or Steelers reach the Super Bowl this year, the "Power 3" will reach 50%.

 
Records of 9-7 teams that missed the playoffs when they did NOT force more than 1 turnover:

Chargers: 1-5
Ravens: 2-6
Lions: 3-4
Seahawks: 4-7
Cowboys: 4-6

If you aren't very good when luck isn't on your side, you're gonna have a bad time.

 
defenses win champhionships right???

AFC Wild Card Playoff: Chiefs over Titans

NFC Wild Card Playoff: Rams 

AFC Wild Card Playoff: Jaguars

NFC Wild Card Playoff: Panthers

NFC Divisional Playoff: Panthers over eagles

AFC Divisional Playoff: Patriots over chiefs

AFC Divisional Playoff: Jags clobber steelers like they did in Oct.

NFC Divisional Playoff: Vikings clobber Rams

AFC Championship: Jags pound the Pats with defense.

NFC Championship: Vikings over Panthers in a close one

Vikings V Jags

Vikings win SB..

those who think the Panthers wont win in N.O. are the same ones saying Saints will win in Philly the following week. .In cold January.outdoors. NOT happening..N.O. is a good story this season, but Carolina is peaking at the right time...ya need to check the Saints' record outdoors in cold weather, esp in playoffs ...no bueno.. 

Pats wont beat a Tom Coughlin Jaguars team. Steelers wont beat Jags either. you worry about Bortles but if i'm NE I'm worried about Jags run game, their WR's, and the ferocious defense..

I CANNOT believe how many Vikings non-believers there are in here.wow.they're the BEST team in the NFL bar none.they play indoors throughout the playoffs ( yes, I'm summarily dismissing the Eagles and any chance they have of even winning a game - they're 1-n-done).Vikings have been better and have been flying under the radar all season long..

I dont get it. Keenum has been playing lights out..usually when a guy gets on a streak like that, it continues..and that defense hits hard.

and Jags might have the best defense since Denver couple years back, or Legion of Boom.they're playing at a historically great level . 

if there's one thing that could happen is that NE could be a bit iffy vs. Chiefs ..you saw a glimpse of this last season with the Texans in the Div round..Chiefs will give them fits.

but Andy Reid doesn't win playoff games, like, ever.so there's that..
by your defense logic then the eagles will beat carolina.  carolinas offense has been just as bad in recent weeks as the eagles and the eagles defense > carolina and they are at home.

i think the saints beat carolina though

 
Rams over Falcons

Saints over Panthers

Titans over Chiefs

Jaguars over Bills

Saints over Eagles

Vikings over Rams

Titans over Patriots

Jaguars over Steelers

Saints over Vikings

Titans over Jaguars

Saints over Titans

 
Rams over Falcons

Saints over Panthers

Titans over Chiefs

Jaguars over Bills

Saints over Eagles

Vikings over Rams

Titans over Patriots

Jaguars over Steelers

Saints over Vikings

Titans over Jaguars

Saints over Titans
Titans over Patriots in New England?  So you're predicting a Brady and Gronk injury the week before?

 
Titans over Patriots in New England?  So you're predicting a Brady and Gronk injury the week before?
Or rumored infighting actually amounts to something?

Titans are one of those teams that could get crushed this week or could catch lightning in a bottle. I'm not predicting the weather but would love to see it happen.

 
Or rumored infighting actually amounts to something?

Titans are one of those teams that could get crushed this week or could catch lightning in a bottle. I'm not predicting the weather but would love to see it happen.
I would love it too. 

 
Or rumored infighting actually amounts to something?

Titans are one of those teams that could get crushed this week or could catch lightning in a bottle. I'm not predicting the weather but would love to see it happen.
TEN has gone 0-4 playing in New England in the TB/BB era, losing by an average score of 37-15. It would be pretty shocking if NE lost to TEN given the roster composition and coaching staffs.

 
AFC Wild Card Playoff: Chiefs over Titans

NFC Wild Card Playoff: Rams over Falcons

AFC Wild Card Playoff: Bills over Jaguars (Jags look horrible lately)

NFC Wild Card Playoff: Saints over Panthers

NFC Divisional Playoff: Saints over Eagles

AFC Divisional Playoff: Patriots over Bills

AFC Divisional Playoff: Steelers over Chiefs

NFC Divisional Playoff: Vikings over Rams

AFC Championship: Steelers over Patriots

NFC Championship: Vikings over Saints

I will be honestly surprised if the four championship team I have aren't the four teams, but I could see either of the teams winning the respective games. 

 
The Titans are awful as are the Bills. They’re both gonna get smoked this weekend. 
At least the bills have McCoy.  Titans are so mediocre.  Watch them win today because it makes no sense. Only way it happens is if Andy Reid does something really dumb

 
Jayded said:
I will be honestly surprised if the four championship team I have aren't the four teams, but I could see either of the teams winning the respective games. 
Really?!? That confident?

I would be honestly surprised if your final four prediction WAS right, even though it is almost straight chalk (with the Wentz-less Eagles basically dogs going forward).

 
I love the Patriots\Eagles bowl at the end but conference games are always crazy.

I think Lebeau had a lot to do with Reid running Hunt 11 times.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top