Tanner9919
Footballguy
yes he did!!I keep waiting to see Felix Jones. I guess I will have to wait until the 2nd half.
Slaton looked good.

yes he did!!I keep waiting to see Felix Jones. I guess I will have to wait until the 2nd half.
Slaton looked good.
I would hope people would agree that when a team has a RB who is superior but they split carries, it is normally to keep him fresh both for the end of the game, and for the season.This is preseason. The plan was for Barber to only play the first half. They didn't need to keep him fresh for the 2nd half, because he wasn't going to play it. He's only getting a half a game of work, that isn't enough it's going to wear him out for the season, so again, the normal motivation for splitting carries wasn't there.We don't know if Phillips was rolling out his new single RB gameplan as the OP suggests, or if he wanted to get Barber a solid half of work to test his conditioning, or if there was just no reason to split carries now as Jones will probably get a lot of work in game 4. In short, I don't think it seems like a similar enough situation to the regular season that we want to read too much out of that aspect of it.
What's his road/home splits for touches?And how do we know his touches will be limited?Every coach in the NFL would love to have two great RBs, keep them both fresh, and wear down a D. However, when the game is on the line, and you want to win the 2nd guy, who isn't as good, usually gets lost in the shuffle. The design of RBBC is on the increase, but heavy load RBs still very much exist. If the Cowboys are in a close game, on the road, and Felix struggles, they won't hesitate to ride Barber. Is that the plan? Not really. But preseason plans usually go out the window when you need to win a game.If it's a good D, on the road, I'd guess Barber is likely to see his touches increase. Rookies make mistakes. You can't afford mistakes on the road against a good D. If Felix goes 4 for 8 on a series, he's going to see less touches in a tight game on the road as the game progresses. Getting Felix experience is secondary to the Cowboys winning.Now if the Cowboys blow people out, Felix will get a larger load. In a tough game, on the road, I'd bump Barber up.we already know Barber will put up numbers at home against the Texans...what we don't know is if his limited touches against good defenses on the road will be enough to make him worthy of his ADP.Personally I think he's ranked about right...I have him as the #9 RB.
I would hope people would agree that when a team has a RB who is superior but they split carries, it is normally to keep him fresh both for the end of the game, and for the season.This is preseason. The plan was for Barber to only play the first half. They didn't need to keep him fresh for the 2nd half, because he wasn't going to play it. He's only getting a half a game of work, that isn't enough it's going to wear him out for the season, so again, the normal motivation for splitting carries wasn't there.We don't know if Phillips was rolling out his new single RB gameplan as the OP suggests, or if he wanted to get Barber a solid half of work to test his conditioning, or if there was just no reason to split carries now as Jones will probably get a lot of work in game 4. In short, I don't think it seems like a similar enough situation to the regular season that we want to read too much out of that aspect of it.
Actually I don't think anything has changed, from before the draft till now. Get it ?You don't think this thread was funny?
I just took Barber at the 5 spot over S.jacksonActually I don't think anything has changed, from before the draft till now. Get it ?You don't think this thread was funny?
I did the same yesterday afternoon. Could come back to haunt me, but the holdout worried me with Jackson.I just took Barber at the 5 spot over S.jacksonActually I don't think anything has changed, from before the draft till now. Get it ?You don't think this thread was funny?
good post, but aren't you kind of assuming that Dallas won't "need" Barber to be a workhorse in order to get to the superbowl? I like Dallas as the favorite, but that division is no cakewalk. clinching a playoff spot, clinching the division, home field advantage, etc. the plan might be to rest him and keep him fresh, but when they have to run out the clock in the 4th quarter of week 15 and Barber already has 27 carries in the game, you really think they're going to stick Jones in there?i didn't really adjust anything based on last night, i've still got Barber for 260 carries and Jones for 140, but Jones has to play better than he did last night if he wants to be that guy that keeps MBIII "fresh".I would hope people would agree that when a team has a RB who is superior but they split carries, it is normally to keep him fresh both for the end of the game, and for the season.This is preseason. The plan was for Barber to only play the first half. They didn't need to keep him fresh for the 2nd half, because he wasn't going to play it. He's only getting a half a game of work, that isn't enough it's going to wear him out for the season, so again, the normal motivation for splitting carries wasn't there.We don't know if Phillips was rolling out his new single RB gameplan as the OP suggests, or if he wanted to get Barber a solid half of work to test his conditioning, or if there was just no reason to split carries now as Jones will probably get a lot of work in game 4. In short, I don't think it seems like a similar enough situation to the regular season that we want to read too much out of that aspect of it.
I never wish an injury on anybody. I think that Barber is a player similar to Shockey always wanting to deliver a finishing shot. That is why Shockey is banged up all the time. If Barber can learn when to get down or out of bounds, he will have a better shot of finishing the season. I also think as far as dynasty, those miles will be city miles. not highway miles.200 carries in 10 games with a season ending injury sounds about right.
Here come all the Barber haters, of course they change the subject and wont admit to being a Barber hater1999 = Birth year?
No, I don't think I made that assumption. Note that I didn't share my opinion on Barber at all. I'm just addressing how much (or how little) one should read out of the preseason game when the main reasons for splitting carries in the regular season aren't necessarily there.good post, but aren't you kind of assuming that Dallas won't "need" Barber to be a workhorse in order to get to the superbowl? I like Dallas as the favorite, but that division is no cakewalk. clinching a playoff spot, clinching the division, home field advantage, etc. the plan might be to rest him and keep him fresh, but when they have to run out the clock in the 4th quarter of week 15 and Barber already has 27 carries in the game, you really think they're going to stick Jones in there?i didn't really adjust anything based on last night, i've still got Barber for 260 carries and Jones for 140, but Jones has to play better than he did last night if he wants to be that guy that keeps MBIII "fresh".I would hope people would agree that when a team has a RB who is superior but they split carries, it is normally to keep him fresh both for the end of the game, and for the season.This is preseason. The plan was for Barber to only play the first half. They didn't need to keep him fresh for the 2nd half, because he wasn't going to play it. He's only getting a half a game of work, that isn't enough it's going to wear him out for the season, so again, the normal motivation for splitting carries wasn't there.We don't know if Phillips was rolling out his new single RB gameplan as the OP suggests, or if he wanted to get Barber a solid half of work to test his conditioning, or if there was just no reason to split carries now as Jones will probably get a lot of work in game 4. In short, I don't think it seems like a similar enough situation to the regular season that we want to read too much out of that aspect of it.
sorry, misread your post. too early :XNo, I don't think I made that assumption. Note that I didn't share my opinion on Barber at all. I'm just addressing how much (or how little) one should read out of the preseason game when the main reasons for splitting carries in the regular season aren't necessarily there.good post, but aren't you kind of assuming that Dallas won't "need" Barber to be a workhorse in order to get to the superbowl? I like Dallas as the favorite, but that division is no cakewalk. clinching a playoff spot, clinching the division, home field advantage, etc. the plan might be to rest him and keep him fresh, but when they have to run out the clock in the 4th quarter of week 15 and Barber already has 27 carries in the game, you really think they're going to stick Jones in there?i didn't really adjust anything based on last night, i've still got Barber for 260 carries and Jones for 140, but Jones has to play better than he did last night if he wants to be that guy that keeps MBIII "fresh".I would hope people would agree that when a team has a RB who is superior but they split carries, it is normally to keep him fresh both for the end of the game, and for the season.This is preseason. The plan was for Barber to only play the first half. They didn't need to keep him fresh for the 2nd half, because he wasn't going to play it. He's only getting a half a game of work, that isn't enough it's going to wear him out for the season, so again, the normal motivation for splitting carries wasn't there.We don't know if Phillips was rolling out his new single RB gameplan as the OP suggests, or if he wanted to get Barber a solid half of work to test his conditioning, or if there was just no reason to split carries now as Jones will probably get a lot of work in game 4. In short, I don't think it seems like a similar enough situation to the regular season that we want to read too much out of that aspect of it.
cantstop,Learn to.TIA.are you confussed, oh ok ill walk on egg shells for ya...Did you just call Schneikes a stud? Coming out of a hole? The hell?Stud, I knew this would drag you out of your hole