Rams re-signed WR Mark Clayton to a one-year contract.
It's bad news for Danario Alexander, who is believed to have practice squad eligibility remaining. Clayton, 29, was not signed to this point because his 2010 ruptured patella tendon had not completely healed. It's unclear if he'll be 100 percent early in the season, but the signing indicates that the Rams plan to have Clayton on their Week 1 roster. He's joining a jumbled depth chart. Clayton will have to overtake at least Donnie Avery and either Mike Sims-Walker or Brandon Gibson to enter three-receiver sets. Aug 31 - 4:03 PM
Per Rotoworld
that is the biggest sleeper news i have heard yet this year in the WR department.. he was shaping up to have an awesome season last year with Bradford before he went down
Week 1 16.9 points (10 receptions, 119 yds)
Week 2 15.4 points (2 receptions, 24 yds, 2 tds)
Week 3 11.0 points (5 receptions, 85 yds)
Week 4 9.7 points (5 receptions, 72 yds)
Week 5 he was injured...
However through those 4 weeks, which were pretty consistant.. he was on pace for 88 receptions, 1200 yds, and 8 tds... those are great numbers for a WR 2... especially if they pick up where they left off and he continues to be Bradford's favorite target
DEFINITELY NEED TO KEEP A CLOSER EYE ON THIS ONE...
I have heard the arguments that this was early on in Bradford's career, and that Clayton will have to battle against a slew of WR's to regain his sport since he was never a #1 WR before those 4 weeks..
What are some thoughts on this situation?? To the Rams homers is this a situation that can pick up where it left off or is the addition of Sims-Walker and Bradford having a year under his belt going to show that even if Clayton regains his starting spot he won't get near as many looks his way? Thoughts?
It's bad news for Danario Alexander, who is believed to have practice squad eligibility remaining. Clayton, 29, was not signed to this point because his 2010 ruptured patella tendon had not completely healed. It's unclear if he'll be 100 percent early in the season, but the signing indicates that the Rams plan to have Clayton on their Week 1 roster. He's joining a jumbled depth chart. Clayton will have to overtake at least Donnie Avery and either Mike Sims-Walker or Brandon Gibson to enter three-receiver sets. Aug 31 - 4:03 PM
Per Rotoworld
that is the biggest sleeper news i have heard yet this year in the WR department.. he was shaping up to have an awesome season last year with Bradford before he went down
Week 1 16.9 points (10 receptions, 119 yds)
Week 2 15.4 points (2 receptions, 24 yds, 2 tds)
Week 3 11.0 points (5 receptions, 85 yds)
Week 4 9.7 points (5 receptions, 72 yds)
Week 5 he was injured...
However through those 4 weeks, which were pretty consistant.. he was on pace for 88 receptions, 1200 yds, and 8 tds... those are great numbers for a WR 2... especially if they pick up where they left off and he continues to be Bradford's favorite target
DEFINITELY NEED TO KEEP A CLOSER EYE ON THIS ONE...
I have heard the arguments that this was early on in Bradford's career, and that Clayton will have to battle against a slew of WR's to regain his sport since he was never a #1 WR before those 4 weeks..
What are some thoughts on this situation?? To the Rams homers is this a situation that can pick up where it left off or is the addition of Sims-Walker and Bradford having a year under his belt going to show that even if Clayton regains his starting spot he won't get near as many looks his way? Thoughts?
Last edited by a moderator: