IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SHARK POOLThreads that are asking for advice on how you should draft or manage your team belong in The Assistant Coach forum. It is posted in real big font at the top of the page. Why do people who have been here so long continue to think we care about their teams and break the rules of the board.I wish their were more people who gave them grief because the embarrassment is the only thing that will stop this crap and wasting space.I'm thinking, I could add him this week (week 6). He's on a bye and so less like to earn negative numbers and more likely to live up to expectation. He can sit next to Antonio Gates, Murray, Britt and Nicks on my "Bench of Suckola.".
At least he had good intentions unlike yourself.This is your 32nd post in over four years, and this is the best you could come up with?
Asking for advice on his team (In a hack approach) when he is clearly breaking a rule in this forum is good intentions.lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololDid you say (type) that with a straight face?What does his post provide to anyone other than himself?At least he had good intentions unlike yourself.This is your 32nd post in over four years, and this is the best you could come up with?
In that case, please refer to post #2.It is clearly sarcasm and not asking for advice.
He didn't ask for advice. He was making a joke in reference to how bad Ingram has been doing. If you weren't so busy being an #######, maybe the joke wouldn't have gone over your head.Asking for advice on his team (In a hack approach) when he is clearly breaking a rule in this forum is good intentions.lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololDid you say (type) that with a straight face?What does his post provide to anyone other than himself?At least he had good intentions unlike yourself.This is your 32nd post in over four years, and this is the best you could come up with?
Who cares? Skip the thread. It's not s huge deal. Why get your panties in a bunch?Asking for advice on his team (In a hack approach) when he is clearly breaking a rule in this forum is good intentions.lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololDid you say (type) that with a straight face?What does his post provide to anyone other than himself?At least he had good intentions unlike yourself.This is your 32nd post in over four years, and this is the best you could come up with?
I have good intentions...His good intention was to make a joke thread about Mark Ingram. Mine was to make fun of him for starting a ####ty thread.At least he had good intentions unlike yourself.This is your 32nd post in over four years, and this is the best you could come up with?
You have intentions. Just because you can explain what they are does not automatically make them good. Kinda like Obamacare.I have good intentions...His good intention was to make a joke thread about Mark Ingram. Mine was to make fun of him for starting a ####ty thread.At least he had good intentions unlike yourself.This is your 32nd post in over four years, and this is the best you could come up with?
I care. I only care because by reading the thread title I thought maybe there was a report about NO looking to deal Ingram, which would be big news. I also care because this thread is moving other, worth while discussions, down the 1st page into message board pergatory. Every thread like this helps to cheapen the available information in the shark poll IMO. Yeah, maybe just this one makes very little impact. Add them all up though and you have a crater.I've now wasted 5 minutes in this thread I'll never get back only because I thought I might get some late breaking information about Ingram.Who cares? Skip the thread. It's not s huge deal. Why get your panties in a bunch?
Well that's a reasonable position.I care. I only care because by reading the thread title I thought maybe there was a report about NO looking to deal Ingram, which would be big news. I also care because this thread is moving other, worth while discussions, down the 1st page into message board pergatory. Every thread like this helps to cheapen the available information in the shark poll IMO. Yeah, maybe just this one makes very little impact. Add them all up though and you have a crater.I've now wasted 5 minutes in this thread I'll never get back only because I thought I might get some late breaking information about Ingram.Who cares? Skip the thread. It's not s huge deal. Why get your panties in a bunch?
Can we have an alias check in aisle 3? TIA.Well that's a reasonable position.I care. I only care because by reading the thread title I thought maybe there was a report about NO looking to deal Ingram, which would be big news. I also care because this thread is moving other, worth while discussions, down the 1st page into message board pergatory. Every thread like this helps to cheapen the available information in the shark poll IMO. Yeah, maybe just this one makes very little impact. Add them all up though and you have a crater.I've now wasted 5 minutes in this thread I'll never get back only because I thought I might get some late breaking information about Ingram.Who cares? Skip the thread. It's not s huge deal. Why get your panties in a bunch?
lolThis is your 32nd post in over four years, and this is the best you could come up with?