Marty Booker (1 Viewer)

[shims3]

Booker has been on a tear in the past 3 weeks. He has scored in each of those games and seems to be the favorite target of Harrington.

Do you trust him enough to start for you in the playoffs?

 

[Trap Play]

Giving him serious consideration over Anquan Boldin at WR2. Champ will be all over Boldin, and the Bills are mediocre against opponents secondary WRs.

 

[4 - Digit Shark]

Not if I finally insert him into my line-up over C. Chambers.

Seriously, Chambers has actually gotten more targets over the last few weeks but has not came close to matching Booker's production. Harrington seems to have a better connection with Booker, and I think you may just have to ride the wave if you need a WR.

 

[The_Man]

I started him this week in large part because of the Football Outsiders research showing how terrible NE is vs. opponents' #2 WR. Moulds might be a good play this week.

 

[shims3]

Would Clements be on Chambers next week or Booker?

 

[Trap Play]

Clements would be on Chambers.

 

[4 - Digit Shark]

Clements would be on Chambers.

Does Clements usually do a good job of shuting downs teams "#1" WR's?I ask because I'm too lazy/busy to look back myself.

 

[Trap Play]

Buffalo is ranked 9th against WR1 and 23rd against WR2 using Football Outsiders stats.

 

[Deuce'sWild]

Starter Booker for the first time this year yesterday over Mason...he may not come out of my lineup again. About time I woke up I guess. I just thought the streak could end anytime, but I'm prepared to ride it out now.

 

[4 - Digit Shark]

In week 2 against BUF the MIA WR's did the following:

Chambers = 4/55/1

Booker = 3/33/0

Welker = 5/41/0

I also looked at the play by play. There was not one pass play (completion & tackle or pass defense) to Chambers that also involved Clements. All were with T. McGee or another defender. Also, all passes to Booker involved N. Clements or another defender. None of them involved T. McGee. So maybe Clements was covering Booker in that game???

 

[Trap Play]

Sorry, you're right. I had them reserved. Nate Clements is a RCB, not a LCB. Marty Booker is a LWR, so Clements will be covering him. Damn.

 

[The Man Who Met Andy Griffith]

Sorry, you're right. I had them reserved. Nate Clements is a RCB, not a LCB. Marty Booker is a LWR, so Clements will be covering him. Damn.

I think you reversed "reversed".

 

[Trap Play]

Yeah, I'm not having a good day today.

 

[shims3]

I benched Booker for Caldwell yesterday and it cost me a win. In my other league, I will not make that mistake.

 

[paz1]

Sorry, you're right. I had them reserved. Nate Clements is a RCB, not a LCB. Marty Booker is a LWR, so Clements will be covering him. Damn.

So Clements will most likely shut down Booker?

 

[Trap Play]

Impossible to say for certain, but the odds of Booker having a great game dip significantly with Clements covering him in my opinion.

 

[Deuce'sWild]

You can't sit him right now, IMO. He's enfuego.

 

[Trap Play]

But would you sit him for a player like Holt or Boldin (i.e. more proven players on a cold streak)?