How did the Indy turf help him and not help all the other players on the field? Didn't all the other players play on the exact same surface as he did? In fact, I think the Indy turf hurt him, if anything, as he slipped and fell on a couple of plays where he was about to make a huge gain. The commentators even noted it.NYCGangGreen said:But the Indy turf helped him a bit with footing and such.
While Taylor is clearly the starter in Jax, you have to think that the Jaguars' coaching staff was inpressed with Drew's play last Sunday. I don't think Drew will put up some decent games vs. weak oppenents. I just put a bid in for him in my Dynasty silent auction, but if I do land him this week, I will sit him at Washington in favor of Maroney and Gore.B-Deep said:Was last week sort of a fluke, or will this kid keep getting carries?
How?? Have you watched the Rams in the last 6 years?? Some players excell on TURF.....no moisture in the surface and no cleats getting muddy/dirty.They have quicker bursts then they do on natural grass. It's a known commodity in the NFL....some teams prefer it, while some don't. it also works against some players. Ricky Williams for one always preferred natural surfaces.How did the Indy turf help him and not help all the other players on the field? Didn't all the other players play on the exact same surface as he did? In fact, I think the Indy turf hurt him, if anything, as he slipped and fell on a couple of plays where he was about to make a huge gain. The commentators even noted it.NYCGangGreen said:But the Indy turf helped him a bit with footing and such.
I think your letting ESPN and there hype fool you. Drew is a very simuler plaer to Bush IMO.I understand excitement, but I don't know about comparing him to Reggie Bush.I watched both players, and Bush was in a league of his own in college.
I'm looking for players who can bust out if an opportunity arises...
I think your letting ESPN and there hype fool you. Drew is a very simuler plaer to Bush IMO.I understand excitement, but I don't know about comparing him to Reggie Bush.I watched both players, and Bush was in a league of his own in college.
I to watched them in college. They are two of my favorite players......I think they are both simuler players that are both very good at multiple things.I watched them both in college - a lot.Maybe you are getting carried away with Bruin hype.
I think your letting ESPN and there hype fool you. Drew is a very simuler plaer to Bush IMO.I understand excitement, but I don't know about comparing him to Reggie Bush.I watched both players, and Bush was in a league of his own in college.I watched them both in college - a lot.Maybe you are getting carried away with Bruin hype.
Add some muscle mass on his legs
I'm thinking back to Barry - His thighs were each the size of my waist.Add some muscle mass on his legshe's ALL muscle mass in his legs.
A little bit. More than Reggie Bush does. Reggie Bush reminds me more of Faulk and LT - he's a fluid runner whose moves BETWEEN the tackles are the most impressive thing about his game. Drew reminds me more of Barry in that he gets hit, but doesn't go down, and he is able to "squirt" out of tackles - and his burst of speed is probably as good as I've ever seen.I'm thinking back to Barry - His thighs were each the size of my waist.Add some muscle mass on his legshe's ALL muscle mass in his legs.
No, I agree, He has good leg mass, I was just making the comparison to him and Barry (who IMO had freaky leg mass). Does he remind you of Sanders at all?
I'm not dismissing your foorball knowledge. Besides...I'm still a NFL newbie myself.Then what was with the "you believe the ESPN hype?"Don't you think that as a FBGuy staff member, I may have watched a bit of football myself and can think independently of what ESPN tells me?Part of being excellent around the Shark Pool is not dismissing other poster's football knowledge with degrading comments.
Agree completely on both calls. I see alot of LT in Bush. He also has a few moves I haven't seen since Gayle Sayers.Exactly on the "squirt" call too. Drew reminds me of Sanders in the stop and start/jitterbug type moves. He seems able to jump in and jump out of very tight spaces and then hit a hole with a burst. I wasn't sure he would be able to do that on this level when he came out of school. Still not completely sold, but I'm getting there.I love Fred (being a Gator), but I wouldn't be surprised to see a RBBC develop here. Del Rio was planning on using Greg Jones to spell Taylor before the season. My guess is he is going to try to get touches to Drew now to take some of the load off.A little bit. More than Reggie Bush does. Reggie Bush reminds me more of Faulk and LT - he's a fluid runner whose moves BETWEEN the tackles are the most impressive thing about his game. Drew reminds me more of Barry in that he gets hit, but doesn't go down, and he is able to "squirt" out of tackles - and his burst of speed is probably as good as I've ever seen.I'm thinking back to Barry - His thighs were each the size of my waist.Add some muscle mass on his legshe's ALL muscle mass in his legs.
No, I agree, He has good leg mass, I was just making the comparison to him and Barry (who IMO had freaky leg mass). Does he remind you of Sanders at all?
The Jags will run the ball between 450 and 500 times this year. 481 in 2003, 446 in 2004, 502 in 2005 - and a 12-4 record - so I don't expect a drop below 450 carries this year. If Del Rio runs it 475 times, that is 30 carries per game. Fred Taylor has been systematically phazed out of the Jags passing game, but he is getting his 20 carries.I can't see a RBBC - as long as Taylor is healthy, Del Rio will get him around 20 carries per game (21, 22, and 21 so far). I foresee Drew getting 7 or 8 carries every game, 4 to 6 targets. More if the Jags get ahead of people.I don't see a RBBC in Jax this year - I think Drew is huge if taylor gets hurt, but will only be spradically worthy of a fantasy start while Taylor is healthy.Agree completely on both calls. I see alot of LT in Bush. He also has a few moves I haven't seen since Gayle Sayers.Exactly on the "squirt" call too. Drew reminds me of Sanders in the stop and start/jitterbug type moves. He seems able to jump in and jump out of very tight spaces and then hit a hole with a burst. I wasn't sure he would be able to do that on this level when he came out of school. Still not completely sold, but I'm getting there.I love Fred (being a Gator), but I wouldn't be surprised to see a RBBC develop here. Del Rio was planning on using Greg Jones to spell Taylor before the season. My guess is he is going to try to get touches to Drew now to take some of the load off.A little bit. More than Reggie Bush does. Reggie Bush reminds me more of Faulk and LT - he's a fluid runner whose moves BETWEEN the tackles are the most impressive thing about his game. Drew reminds me more of Barry in that he gets hit, but doesn't go down, and he is able to "squirt" out of tackles - and his burst of speed is probably as good as I've ever seen.I'm thinking back to Barry - His thighs were each the size of my waist.Add some muscle mass on his legshe's ALL muscle mass in his legs.
No, I agree, He has good leg mass, I was just making the comparison to him and Barry (who IMO had freaky leg mass). Does he remind you of Sanders at all?
ok - finally - I disagree.The Jags will run the ball between 450 and 500 times this year. 481 in 2003, 446 in 2004, 502 in 2005 - and a 12-4 record - so I don't expect a drop below 450 carries this year. If Del Rio runs it 475 times, that is 30 carries per game. Fred Taylor has been systematically phazed out of the Jags passing game, but he is getting his 20 carries.I can't see a RBBC - as long as Taylor is healthy, Del Rio will get him around 20 carries per game (21, 22, and 21 so far). I foresee Drew getting 7 or 8 carries every game, 4 to 6 targets. More if the Jags get ahead of people.I don't see a RBBC in Jax this year - I think Drew is huge if taylor gets hurt, but will only be spradically worthy of a fantasy start while Taylor is healthy.Agree completely on both calls. I see alot of LT in Bush. He also has a few moves I haven't seen since Gayle Sayers.Exactly on the "squirt" call too. Drew reminds me of Sanders in the stop and start/jitterbug type moves. He seems able to jump in and jump out of very tight spaces and then hit a hole with a burst. I wasn't sure he would be able to do that on this level when he came out of school. Still not completely sold, but I'm getting there.I love Fred (being a Gator), but I wouldn't be surprised to see a RBBC develop here. Del Rio was planning on using Greg Jones to spell Taylor before the season. My guess is he is going to try to get touches to Drew now to take some of the load off.A little bit. More than Reggie Bush does. Reggie Bush reminds me more of Faulk and LT - he's a fluid runner whose moves BETWEEN the tackles are the most impressive thing about his game. Drew reminds me more of Barry in that he gets hit, but doesn't go down, and he is able to "squirt" out of tackles - and his burst of speed is probably as good as I've ever seen.I'm thinking back to Barry - His thighs were each the size of my waist.Add some muscle mass on his legshe's ALL muscle mass in his legs.
No, I agree, He has good leg mass, I was just making the comparison to him and Barry (who IMO had freaky leg mass). Does he remind you of Sanders at all?
I can see 500 attempts, but you are not factoring in rushes by other RBs, by FBs, by the QB, and trick plays to WRs.I'm thinking a little closer to 500 atts with the way the defense is playing. 32 carries a game - 20 to Taylor/10-12 to Drew.
hmmmmhow much will his role increase if taylor goes down? Do they have faith he can handle the load, or will toefield get the bulk of the carries?that was my concern, i like his upside, but not sure he'll EVER get the carries.I finally found a better prospect than Wally Lundy on my WW.His name is Drew.It is unlikely I will use him this year (wer start-2 and I have LT, TBell - both done with byes after this week - Reggie Bush, MTurner, Ced Ben, plus Drew).But, if he IS thrust into the limelight - esp. if Taylor has a season ending injury - Bush and/or TBell become expendable. He should be on a roster for his upside.
As a floor, I'd double his number of carries.He is "da man" you want on that squad if Taylor gets hurt. Even if they work Toefiled in some. just look at he carry distribution last year when Taylor went down - folks got chances. And, as I have said many times, T + O = FPDrew's Talent is such that 15 carries and 3 or 4 catches could be enough Opportunity to create great Fantasy Points.If Taylor were to be hurt, then, IMO, Drew = top-15 RB. Toefield = RB30 or so.how much will his role increase if taylor goes down?
Yes, I have. As a former diehard Ram fan with a casual rooting interest for them now, I've watched most of their games. However, they still were faster and quicker than pretty much every team regardless of the surface. Having actually played on artifical turf myself, I completely understand that the cuts are quicker and you get a quicker burst. I wasn't a terribly fast player, but I was faster on turf. The guys that were burners on my team were burners on grass and turf, and they certainly were faster than me on grass, as well.I guess what I am saying is that I have yet to see concrete proof of what you say. I'm not saying that you aren't right, but I am basing this on both experience and logic. Why would one person's quickness and speed increase more than another? Isn't the increase going to aid everyone? The fastest guy is still going to be the fastest guy on both surfaces. If you have evidence that this is true, then I'd love to see it. Now, playing on muddy, wet surfaces is definitely the great equalizer. Players that rely on cuts will no longer be able to make them as sharply, which aids those that don't or are trying to defend against them.Virtually all players prefered playing on natural surfaces prior to the advent of Field Turf as opposed to the old artificial turf. Many careers were ended due to the old artificial turf.How?? Have you watched the Rams in the last 6 years?? Some players excell on TURF.....no moisture in the surface and no cleats getting muddy/dirty.They have quicker bursts then they do on natural grass. It's a known commodity in the NFL....some teams prefer it, while some don't. it also works against some players. Ricky Williams for one always preferred natural surfaces.How did the Indy turf help him and not help all the other players on the field? Didn't all the other players play on the exact same surface as he did? In fact, I think the Indy turf hurt him, if anything, as he slipped and fell on a couple of plays where he was about to make a huge gain. The commentators even noted it.But the Indy turf helped him a bit with footing and such.
I agree with you in one way, but disagree in another. Yes, Bush was unbelievable in college.However, Reggie was aided greatly by those around him. His OL was one of the best in college football (some argue one of the best in college football history). Defenses couldn't key entirely on him because they'd get torched by Dwayne Jarrett, Steve Smith, Byrd, and Mike Williams before them.Maurice Drew, although surrounded by one elite talent in Marcedes Lewis, didn't really have that benefit. Drew Olson didn't scare anyone even during one of the greatest seasons in UCLA history. I doubt anyone on this board outside of UCLA fans and perhaps a few Pac-10 fans could name you a single receiver on UCLA's team. Maurice Drew single-handedly won games for UCLA. Reggie Bush helped win games for USC, but I don't know if you can say that he single-handedly won them games. I can't really recall any particular games, but it's entirely possible that he did. I just think Maurice did more with less. Reggie did a whole lot with more.Maurice was also a far more productive punt returner.I guess what I am saying is that if you put Maurice Drew on USC (which Pete Carroll tried unsuccessfully to do), and put Reggie Bush on UCLA, whose game/stats do you think elevated or dropped more? I think they are a lot closer in talent than you do.Regardless, they both were absolutely incredible in college and will both be great NFL players.I understand excitement, but I don't know about comparing him to Reggie Bush.I watched both players, and Bush was in a league of his own in college.
I'm with "Dogg" on this one......it is amazing the negative thoughts coming from the East when a great player comes from the Pac 10. You never read thoughtless negative bashing towards other conference studs from Pac 10 alums. I think appreciation of talent has no boundaries......maybe it's because the Eastern folk get stuck with the best games being on later then they want to watch them. But Jones-Drew was.....and will be capable of "getting his"......just take the time to watch the film. He was the best "high-light" reel of 2005 College Football......Bush had his, but Jones-Drew was without an all NFL line!I agree with you in one way, but disagree in another. Yes, Bush was unbelievable in college.However, Reggie was aided greatly by those around him. His OL was one of the best in college football (some argue one of the best in college football history). Defenses couldn't key entirely on him because they'd get torched by Dwayne Jarrett, Steve Smith, Byrd, and Mike Williams before them.Maurice Drew, although surrounded by one elite talent in Marcedes Lewis, didn't really have that benefit. Drew Olson didn't scare anyone even during one of the greatest seasons in UCLA history. I doubt anyone on this board outside of UCLA fans and perhaps a few Pac-10 fans could name you a single receiver on UCLA's team. Maurice Drew single-handedly won games for UCLA. Reggie Bush helped win games for USC, but I don't know if you can say that he single-handedly won them games. I can't really recall any particular games, but it's entirely possible that he did. I just think Maurice did more with less. Reggie did a whole lot with more.Maurice was also a far more productive punt returner.I guess what I am saying is that if you put Maurice Drew on USC (which Pete Carroll tried unsuccessfully to do), and put Reggie Bush on UCLA, whose game/stats do you think elevated or dropped more? I think they are a lot closer in talent than you do.Regardless, they both were absolutely incredible in college and will both be great NFL players.I understand excitement, but I don't know about comparing him to Reggie Bush.I watched both players, and Bush was in a league of his own in college.
I believe that all depends on the health of Greg Jones. He is Del Rio's favorite style of player, hands down.BUMP.Does Drew have a shot at being the #1 guy next year? Or is there no way Taylor loses his job to him?I have to think that as long as TAylor is there, he is the #1 back. Perhaps Fred will be somewhere else next year clearing the way for Drew