This one is a head scratcher. Care to explain this? Did you watch the game today?Funny because Dallas would be better off if they would stick with him.
I missed it. Did Felix Jones carry them to victory?This one is a head scratcher. Care to explain this? Did you watch the game today?Funny because Dallas would be better off if they would stick with him.
Really? Not sure how anyone could say that after today. Felix was a far better running threat, better blocker, just overall better. There is nothing in Barber's game that makes me think the Cowboys would be better off sticking with him. Sorry, not trying to be a jerk, but today was the first time the Boys running game clicked, and it was due to keeping Jones involved.well had to play him and iit looks like he cost me the game. Im thinking its time to drop him. Funny because Dallas would be better off if they would stick with him.
LOL. No, neither of them did. But I can tell you that the Dallas Cowboys are not going ANYWHERE without Tony Romo. Marion Barber was embarrassing in pass protection today and a team like the Giants, Steelers, Jets, Vikings, Titans, ect will absolutely have a field day if that is the protection they are going to provide him.I missed it. Did Felix Jones carry them to victory?This one is a head scratcher. Care to explain this? Did you watch the game today?Funny because Dallas would be better off if they would stick with him.
It's only Week 5. Plnety of time for Wade to get MBIII more involved. If not, well... you saw the result of the game today, right?
People can't really think the Cowboys lost due to anything Jones did, right? I mean, I didn't see him force Romo to throw those INTs, or Witten to drop those passes. The Cowboys scored 27 points, tied for their highest point total of the season. The other game the Cowboys won. Of course, the Cowboys couldn't have lost because the defense allowed 34 points, right?The loss had NOTHING to do with which RB saw more carries.I missed it. Did Felix Jones carry them to victory?This one is a head scratcher. Care to explain this? Did you watch the game today?Funny because Dallas would be better off if they would stick with him.
Guess you didn't read the OP, I don't think the thread was hijacked. Every comment is directly related to the OP.a MBIII thread hijacked . . .shocker . . .
Until further developments with a Felix injury or benching, I would think 60/TD is the best you could expect from Barber, week in and week out. And that is his ceiling. Bye week fill-in at best.a MBIII thread hijacked . . .shocker . . .
Correct answer. Earlier in the year I was trying to trade FOR Felix Jones because I had Barber. Now I am trying to trade Barber to the Jones owner but he wants no part of him.Now I am offering him for bye week backups at DL or LB.I think your only shot is to see if the Felix Jones owner wants him for something for insurance... maybe you get a bye-week fill in elsewhere? A useful defense? A handcuff to one of your own RBs?
i bet it felt really good to finally be able to type that.switz said:I fully expect Barber to still see work in games, especially 4th quarter. Depending on your roster size, he's probably a good player for BYE fill in, on the chance the Boys have a late lead and Barbers touches increase.
i bet it felt really good to finally be able to type that.switz said:I fully expect Barber to still see work in games, especially 4th quarter. Depending on your roster size, he's probably a good player for BYE fill in, on the chance the Boys have a late lead and Barbers touches increase.![]()
This. Deadline is October 19 so that's just one more week on my bench.Hold him and hope he gets traded.
Hold, but not because of the trading deadline. It is far more likely Jones gets hurt based on his history.This. Deadline is October 19 so that's just one more week on my bench.Hold him and hope he gets traded.
For those saying to hold him in case Jones gets hurt, any chance that the Cowboys then turn to Choice instead of MBIII?
re: your well documented felixi bet it felt really good to finally be able to type that.switz said:I fully expect Barber to still see work in games, especially 4th quarter. Depending on your roster size, he's probably a good player for BYE fill in, on the chance the Boys have a late lead and Barbers touches increase.![]()
![]()
I Just don't understand, why Dallas would say that there going to feature F Jones last week then actually do it, I thought it was smoke screen... but i guess they really are that dumb to give out a game plain like that. Also just goes to show that Wade has no power to Jones, don't even know why Jones doesn't just hit the sidelines with a headset and call the plays too instead of using a puppet. Felix is the better back in between then 20 because of his big play ability but Jones did get stuffed at the GL, I think if they used these backs like they did with Julius jones in between the 20s and barber as the red zone they would be more effective.well had to play him and iit looks like he cost me the game. Im thinking its time to drop him. Funny because Dallas would be better off if they would stick with him.
I remember this happening to MBIII as well. Maybe its not the RB.creeps1313 said:AmI the only person that remembers a first and goal from the three that consisted of a Felix run for 1 yard....Felix run for -1 yard...Felix catch for no yards....final result...FG? Hopefully Dallas will see that inside the 10 they need to use Barber...
Both good postings...I remember this happening to MBIII as well. Maybe its not the RB.creeps1313 said:AmI the only person that remembers a first and goal from the three that consisted of a Felix run for 1 yard....Felix run for -1 yard...Felix catch for no yards....final result...FG? Hopefully Dallas will see that inside the 10 they need to use Barber...
FYPthe spanker said:eoMMan said:For those saying to hold him in case Jones gets hurt, any chance that the Cowboys then turn to Choice instead of MBIII?Just what I was goingto type. Personally I think Choice is better than Barber and Felix.
I remember this happening to MBIII as well. Maybe its not the RB.creeps1313 said:AmI the only person that remembers a first and goal from the three that consisted of a Felix run for 1 yard....Felix run for -1 yard...Felix catch for no yards....final result...FG? Hopefully Dallas will see that inside the 10 they need to use Barber...
it's not like Jones got stuffed on three consecutive tries from the one. The false start was the issue on that drive.1-9-TEN 9
(12:34) 28-F.Jones left end pushed ob at TEN 3 for 6 yards (51-G.McRath).
2-3-TEN 3
(12:01) 28-F.Jones left guard to TEN 3 for no gain (55-S.Tulloch).
3-3-TEN 3
(11:20) (Shotgun) PENALTY on DAL-68-D.Free, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at TEN 3 - No Play.
3-8-TEN 8
(10:55) (Shotgun) 9-T.Romo pass short right to 28-F.Jones to TEN 8 for no gain (55-S.Tulloch).
Really?Jones this yearJones looked decent last week, but he definitely seemed fatter and much less explosive than last year. I can't see him being the more than a low-end RB2 going forward. Maybe he's lost a little of his edge, but MBIII still looks mostly like MBIII to me.
Well, I have no empirical data to back it up, and I'm not a Cowboys fan, so I don't watch every game. I just know that for the last couple years it seems like Felix was 2 steps quicker than anyone on the field, almost CJ2K-quick. 6 ypc practically meant he busted 6-8 yards on every carry. Maybe he was just so fast I couldn't see how big he was.Really?Jones this yearJones looked decent last week, but he definitely seemed fatter and much less explosive than last year. I can't see him being the more than a low-end RB2 going forward. Maybe he's lost a little of his edge, but MBIII still looks mostly like MBIII to me.
Jones at Arkansas
Can anyone really say he looks "fatter"? He averaged over 6 YPC last week, there's no way he's "slower" - this nonsense has to stop.
As for MBIII looking like MBIII - only if you mean the MBIII that was playing with a torn quad last year at the end... this year's MBIII still looks like that.
I'm not trying to bash on Barber or be a Felix-fanboy, or whatever - as you guys will accuse me of....
There's just no logic in saying Felix looks fat and slow and MBII looks great. NOTHING supports that conclusion.
I'm in a leagus that allows an owner to start a max of 2 RB. (There's a flex spot, but only one RB slot, so pretty much everybody goes 2 RB.)In such a league, I'm finding it difficult to hold onto Barber.Obviously, the answer to "What to do with Marion Barber?" depends on league depth and team roster depth/composition. How likely is it he will ever start, given the team's depth?For me, I'm finding it pretty unlikely he'll start for me. But possible. Might still like to use his slot on another upside player, rather than Barber. I also have Snelling. I like Snelling near the end of my bench more than I do Barber, as Snelling may be a UFA next season (5-keeper league), and reminds me of Turner. I probably wouldn't drop Barber to grab Shelling off the wire. Both are on my team. I own Chris Johnson, and do not own Michael Turner. Though not a handcuff fan (preferring to rely on my bench, when necessary), I'm starting to feel it'd be a real good idea to roster Ringer. (Thinking out loud.) But am wrestlying with whether to jettison Barber or Snelling to grab him.As I said, the answer to "What to do with Marion Barber?" depends on league depth and team roster depth/composition. How likely is it he will ever start, given the team's depth?Though any of us could come up with a BUY/HOLD/SELL on a player, it's little more than an upgrade or downgrade, and is often made in ignorance of the OP's situation.More generally, as a former Barber fan (football, not fantasy), the guy is really bumming me out to watch. What happened?You hold on Barber. He'll still be a part of the offense, though probably in a diminished role. But he'll get a few TDs and will be used enough to be a flex type IMO.