This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Uhhh, I remember someone mentioning before that KC was planning on running the ball somewhere in the high 500 range. Thus, LJ can't do it all. These LJ owners are like a pesky mosquito that won't go away. Bennett will get to see plenty of action, it's just not the action you can count on for determining FF start ability on bye weeks. Of course, IF LJ were to go down....that's a whole other story.
I see LJ falling off, becuase of the Tackle retirements in KC,and the hiring of Herm Edwards. He'll be exposed for the poor game planner and motivator he is. Especially following a legend like Vermiel. And, if LJ goes dow, the KC run game suffers, because LJ will be the one keeping it somewhat afloat. Bennett just doesn't bring near the same package to the table. He's a speed guy, not the juking quickness that Holmes had. Find another backup to carry w/ that roster spot. K. Faulk? Turner? There's got to be somebody else. I see little to no value in Bennet.
I think there's little chance of Bennett being asked to carry the ball 25+ times if LJ goes down. IMO it would be RBBC with Brown, or Brown would get the lion's share.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.