Re: McFadden, it's hard for me to get over my Bay Area bias and believe. I agree he is a statistical powerhouse when he is healthy. I can't explain why I agree with you re: "injury risk"/reward on guys like Vick and Gore but get conservative re: guys like DMac and MJD.If MJD is healthy, and he says that he is, then he should be good to go and grouped right with Gore, Mendenhall and McCoy. McFadden also outscored all those guys last year and I don't see why he wouldn't be in that group as well. Jackson I agree a tier below at this point, along with Forte, Hillis, Turner, and Blount.
That said, I would take Vick 6th and you can see my argument for that in various other posts I've made in the past few days if you're interested. From there, I think I have it McCoy (7), Gore (8), McFadden (9), Andre (10), MJD (11), Mendenhall (12).
HGH testing is going to hurt Hillis. Just sayin'.
HGH testing is going to hurt Hillis everyone. Just sayin'.
so you are saying that you would draft M Lynch before any of the top Wr's? That is the question of this thread, not who do you think will out perform their ADP. Your VBD is not working very well if you take Lynch in the first round.I'll get laughed at, as he has yet to prove otherwise, but I think Marshawn Lynch has a good shot to put up numbers to get into this tier of backs. Just below the SJax, Forte, maybe even better than Hillis.