A bit confused on this.
Outlook
The transition back to a 4-3 defense should be a seamless one for Greenwood. He goes back to playing weakside linebacker, a position that he excelled with two years ago as a Dolphin. He ended up a top 30-40 LB in IDP leagues and with back to back seasons over 100 tackles, you're not going to surprise anybody with this pick. While we don't think his upside over last year's numbers is significant, his downside is even less likely and we look to another 100+ tackle season and a top 50 LB at worst.
Writeups last modified: 2006-05-06 17:17:00
2006 Projection
TKL AST SACK FF FR INT PD FPT 40 18 1 0 1 0 2 56.0Were the projections updated and not the writeups? If so, can you put a 'Projections last modified: xxxxxxx' notation on there too. It is very confusing. If the projections were not modified care to elaborate on the huge discrepency?I understand the low projections for him due to Ryans possibly taking over his spot, just very confused when reading the player page.
TIA
Outlook
The transition back to a 4-3 defense should be a seamless one for Greenwood. He goes back to playing weakside linebacker, a position that he excelled with two years ago as a Dolphin. He ended up a top 30-40 LB in IDP leagues and with back to back seasons over 100 tackles, you're not going to surprise anybody with this pick. While we don't think his upside over last year's numbers is significant, his downside is even less likely and we look to another 100+ tackle season and a top 50 LB at worst.
Writeups last modified: 2006-05-06 17:17:00
2006 Projection
TKL AST SACK FF FR INT PD FPT 40 18 1 0 1 0 2 56.0Were the projections updated and not the writeups? If so, can you put a 'Projections last modified: xxxxxxx' notation on there too. It is very confusing. If the projections were not modified care to elaborate on the huge discrepency?I understand the low projections for him due to Ryans possibly taking over his spot, just very confused when reading the player page.
TIA