What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

My final, "best guess" mock draft. (1 Viewer)

Honda

Footballguy
1 St. Louis - Sam Bradford QB Oklahoma

Who is going to come and watch a team with A.J. Feeley and Keith Null as the quarterbacks?

2 Detroit - Ndamukong Suh DT Nebraska

Trading for Sims means Backus stays at LT and Schwartz gets to develop the defense like he wants to.

3 Tampa Bay - Gerald McCoy DT Oklahoma

I really want to put Okung here, but DT is more pressing need and Penn is at least serviceable.

4 Washington - Russell Okung OT Oklahoma State

They may as well go ahead and have at least one tackle on the roster.

5 Kansas City - Eric Berry FS Tennessee

About the only guy that makes any sense right here.

6 Seattle Trent Williams OT Oklahoma

They have not drafted anyone to play tackle since 2005 (Ray Willis - who?) and their mini-camp showed that it is imperative they fix the problem.

7 Cleveland - Jimmy Clausen QB Notre Dame

Who would have thought their QB position could get WORSE in the offseason?

8 Oakland - Kyle Wilson CB Boise State

Wilson's shooting up the board, they seem intent on trading Namdi Asomugha, and I swear I thought this was a possibility before I saw Gosselin had this in his 2nd mock posted yesterday.

9 Buffalo - Bryan Bulaga OT Iowa

Not quite the prospect many believe, but certainly an upgrade from what they have.

10 Jacksonville - C.J. Spiller RB Clemson

The rumors are there and I don't like it, but with JDR in the hot seat they do need to take a player that can contribute big and right away.

11 Denver (from Chicago) - Dan Williams DT Tennessee

Even after shoring up the front three in free agency, they need to infuse some youth at the position.

12 Miami - Derrick Morgan DE Georgia Tech

If he's there, he's the guy otherwise I think it's Graham.

13 San Francisco Brandon Graham OLB Michigan

They can wait on taking a right tackle, and with the right pass rush could have one of the league's up and coming defenses.

14 Seattle (from Denver) - Ryan Mathews RB Fresno State

After rushing for only 7 TDs last year it's obvious that Jones and Forsett aren't the answer.

15 New York Giants - Rolando McClain ILB Alabama

What a gift this would be for the Giants.

16 Tennessee - Joe Haden CB Florida

They had the league's worst pass defense last year.

17 San Francisco (from Carolina) - Earl Thomas CB Texas

They have to like either Thomas or Taylor Mays here.

18 Pittsburgh - Kareem Jackson CB Alabama

Jackson or McCourty. I thought about Odrick and Iupati.

19 Atlanta - Sean Weatherspoon OLB Missouri

Too much chatter to ignore and current starter Mike Peterson is 34 years old.

20 Houston - Devin McCourty CB Rutgers

If Mathews and the other top DBs are gone, they might have to "settle" for McCourty. Iupati or Pouncey wouldn't surprise me though.

21 Cincinnati - Mike Iupati OG Idaho

They need to do more to prevent the death of Carson Palmer.

22 New England - Jared Odrick DT Penn State

Trading Seymour was a mistake and the suddenly mediocre Pats need to hit on their draft this year rather than taking fliers.

23 Green Bay - Sergio Kindle OLB Texas

Has played both DE and LB which should make playing in the 3-4 easier.

24 Philadelphia - Taylor Mays FS Southern California

We all know his limitations but his strengths would bring a lot to a soft defense.

25 Baltimore - Brian Price DT UCLA

If the top DBs are off the board, d-line is nearly a given IMO.

26 Arizona - Terrence Cody DT Alabama

He should hold up well in the heat of Arizona. :popcorn:

27 Dallas - Dez Bryant WR Oklahoma State

Where there's smoke, there's fire here. Wouldn't shock me to see them "reach" for Nate Allen. Obviously tackle is a possibility too.

28 San Diego - Golden Tate WR Notre Dame

Jackson may yet be suspended, beyond Floyd there's not much depth, and picking higher in the 2nd defers the necessity of filling of other needs (I really like Tyson Alualu and Toby Gerhart here as well).

29 New York Jets - Jerry Hughes OLB TCU

Flirting with Jason Taylor tips their hand a bit.

30 Minnesota - Maurkice Pouncey C Florida

John Sullivan was pushed into the backfield far too often last year.

31 Indianapolis - Rodger Saffold OT Indiana

He's not the greatest prospect, but is a four year starter and could come in and play right away - which the Colts need.

32 New Orleans - Daryl Washington OLB TCU

A more than adequate replacement for the departed Fujita.

My top 8 Players on the radar that could easily go in the 1st and why they didn't here:

Anthony Davis OT Rutgers - Just not consistent enough. Scouting reports are replete with stories of laziness despite world class talent.

Jermaine Gresham TE Oklahoma - He's a one-dimensional tight end coming off a season lost to injury.

Demaryius Thomas WR Georgia Tech - It's just a shame that he played in an offense that paid homage to the leather helmet days each and every week.

Tyson Alualu DE California - At the end of the day, I expect him to go in the 1st. Otherwise he's a steal at the top of the 2nd.

Nate Allen FS South Florida - Could very easily take Mays' place in the 1st.

Colt McCoy QB Texas - People are too infatuated with rocket arms. He's talented enough and is a four year starter at a major program which counts for a ton in my book (see: Philip Rivers).

Toby Gerhart RB Stanford - It's not that he's white, it's that he's just not THAT athletic to warrant a 1st round pick. But he should go high 2nd. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see the Chargers take him in the 1st if things were to play out this way.

Ricky Sapp OLB Clemson - One of the 3-4 teams at the bottom of the 1st (like the Jets or Cardinals) could take him.

6 players that will screw up all mock drafts:

1. Eric Berry

2. Jimmy Clausen

3. Anthony Davis

4. Bruce Campbell

5. Everson Griffen

6. Golden Tate

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know everyone's bored with mocks at this point, but I had to get it out of my system.

Only two more days fellas! :popcorn:

 
i did one of those vomit-burps after seeing the chargers pick. thanks
One thing I've learned is to expect the unexpected from a Chargers draft.For as productive as he was last year, and for as versatile as he is, I think Tate's criminally undervalued. If he doesn't go in the 1st, he should be the first pick in the 2nd.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm thinking that the Rams take Bradford with the #1 but if Clausen is available with the #7, that they will trade him to the Browns and take Jimmy with the pick.

 
Everything I keep reading about Kindle is negative. He plays soft, struggles to change directions, can't get off blocks. I know he is one of a few players who played in a 3-4 in college but I hope the Packers don't take him. I would rather have them take the upside of Hughes in your draft scenario or Patrick Robinson, Charles Brown or Nate Allen.

 
Everything I keep reading about Kindle is negative. He plays soft, struggles to change directions, can't get off blocks. I know he is one of a few players who played in a 3-4 in college but I hope the Packers don't take him. I would rather have them take the upside of Hughes in your draft scenario or Patrick Robinson, Charles Brown or Nate Allen.
I have read mixed reviews on Kindle. Not sure if you're reading enough if "everything" is negative. ;)Hughes is definitely a possibility and when I do these mocks, I'm focused more on getting the position right (snicker) than reflecting some sort of ranking within the position.All those other guys are definite possibilities too. When it gets to the Packers, it'll be whoever TT thinks is the BPA. The good thing for the Pack is that the draft is deep for each of their needs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice work. No complaints from me this time.

I'm kind of torn on Demaryius Thomas. On the one hand I think he clearly has the talent to warrant a first round pick. On the other hand, I doubt he will go in the top 20 unless Atlanta or Pittsburgh loves him and he's not a great fit for any of the teams in the late first. I think we could see one of the early second round teams like St. Louis, Cleveland, Buffalo, or Tampa Bay jump up into the 20s to grab him. He would make a ton of sense for all of them.

 
Nice work. No complaints from me this time.I'm kind of torn on Demaryius Thomas. On the one hand I think he clearly has the talent to warrant a first round pick. On the other hand, I doubt he will go in the top 20 unless Atlanta or Pittsburgh loves him and he's not a great fit for any of the teams in the late first. I think we could see one of the early second round teams like St. Louis, Cleveland, Buffalo, or Tampa Bay jump up into the 20s to grab him. He would make a ton of sense for all of them.
I can really see San Diego going WR if there are no CBs or RBs they like.
 
Nice work. No complaints from me this time.I'm kind of torn on Demaryius Thomas. On the one hand I think he clearly has the talent to warrant a first round pick. On the other hand, I doubt he will go in the top 20 unless Atlanta or Pittsburgh loves him and he's not a great fit for any of the teams in the late first. I think we could see one of the early second round teams like St. Louis, Cleveland, Buffalo, or Tampa Bay jump up into the 20s to grab him. He would make a ton of sense for all of them.
I can really see San Diego going WR if there are no CBs or RBs they like.
they need a DT badly as well. could use a RT upgrade.
 
Nice work. No complaints from me this time.I'm kind of torn on Demaryius Thomas. On the one hand I think he clearly has the talent to warrant a first round pick. On the other hand, I doubt he will go in the top 20 unless Atlanta or Pittsburgh loves him and he's not a great fit for any of the teams in the late first. I think we could see one of the early second round teams like St. Louis, Cleveland, Buffalo, or Tampa Bay jump up into the 20s to grab him. He would make a ton of sense for all of them.
I can really see San Diego going WR if there are no CBs or RBs they like.
they need a DT badly as well. could use a RT upgrade.
Sure, that's why I said I like Alualu at the spot too. But being in the top part of the 2nd helps them in regards to taking a DT or RT.Or they could/should trade up. I think they've painted themselves into the corner with their RB situation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honda said:
Or they could/should trade up. I think they've painted themselves into the corner with their RB situation.
I think that's why the Whitehurst trade was nice for them. Now that they have the 40th pick in addition to the 28th pick, they can sit back there and grab whoever falls out of Best/Gerhart/Hardesty with their second rounder.
 
Honda said:
Or they could/should trade up. I think they've painted themselves into the corner with their RB situation.
I think that's why the Whitehurst trade was nice for them. Now that they have the 40th pick in addition to the 28th pick, they can sit back there and grab whoever falls out of Best/Gerhart/Hardesty with their second rounder.
That's what I can see - them taking Gerhart/Hardesty with their 2nd rounder.I cannot see them taking Best who is only marginally bigger than Sproles. They could look at a lot of quality guys that may/should last until the 3rd at d-line: Arthur Jones Syracuse Linval Joseph East Carolina Cam Thomas North Carolina Geno Atkins Georgia Alex Carrington Arkansas StateTorrell Troup Central Florida
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honda said:
jurrassic said:
Everything I keep reading about Kindle is negative. He plays soft, struggles to change directions, can't get off blocks. I know he is one of a few players who played in a 3-4 in college but I hope the Packers don't take him. I would rather have them take the upside of Hughes in your draft scenario or Patrick Robinson, Charles Brown or Nate Allen.
I have read mixed reviews on Kindle. Not sure if you're reading enough if "everything" is negative. :lol:Hughes is definitely a possibility and when I do these mocks, I'm focused more on getting the position right (snicker) than reflecting some sort of ranking within the position.All those other guys are definite possibilities too. When it gets to the Packers, it'll be whoever TT thinks is the BPA. The good thing for the Pack is that the draft is deep for each of their needs.
Point taken, I was a little exagerated with the word "everything". I will say it's about 75% negative and 25% postive. His name consistently comes up from scouts and draft sights as being one of the overrated players in this draft. He has gone to Dallas in a few of the mocks I have seen, although I think they will take a tackle. Hopefully he's gone so TT doesn't have the temptation to take him. They need aggressiveness on defense, I don't think Kindle brings that.
 
Honda said:
jurrassic said:
Everything I keep reading about Kindle is negative. He plays soft, struggles to change directions, can't get off blocks. I know he is one of a few players who played in a 3-4 in college but I hope the Packers don't take him. I would rather have them take the upside of Hughes in your draft scenario or Patrick Robinson, Charles Brown or Nate Allen.
I have read mixed reviews on Kindle. Not sure if you're reading enough if "everything" is negative. :lol:Hughes is definitely a possibility and when I do these mocks, I'm focused more on getting the position right (snicker) than reflecting some sort of ranking within the position.All those other guys are definite possibilities too. When it gets to the Packers, it'll be whoever TT thinks is the BPA. The good thing for the Pack is that the draft is deep for each of their needs.
Point taken, I was a little exagerated with the word "everything". I will say it's about 75% negative and 25% postive. His name consistently comes up from scouts and draft sights as being one of the overrated players in this draft. He has gone to Dallas in a few of the mocks I have seen, although I think they will take a tackle. Hopefully he's gone so TT doesn't have the temptation to take him. They need aggressiveness on defense, I don't think Kindle brings that.
Another guy I think might slip into the 1st to a 3-4 team (and possibly specifically the Packers) is Ricky Sapp.
 
Honda said:
jurrassic said:
Everything I keep reading about Kindle is negative. He plays soft, struggles to change directions, can't get off blocks. I know he is one of a few players who played in a 3-4 in college but I hope the Packers don't take him. I would rather have them take the upside of Hughes in your draft scenario or Patrick Robinson, Charles Brown or Nate Allen.
I have read mixed reviews on Kindle. Not sure if you're reading enough if "everything" is negative. :thumbup:Hughes is definitely a possibility and when I do these mocks, I'm focused more on getting the position right (snicker) than reflecting some sort of ranking within the position.All those other guys are definite possibilities too. When it gets to the Packers, it'll be whoever TT thinks is the BPA. The good thing for the Pack is that the draft is deep for each of their needs.
Point taken, I was a little exagerated with the word "everything". I will say it's about 75% negative and 25% postive. His name consistently comes up from scouts and draft sights as being one of the overrated players in this draft. He has gone to Dallas in a few of the mocks I have seen, although I think they will take a tackle. Hopefully he's gone so TT doesn't have the temptation to take him. They need aggressiveness on defense, I don't think Kindle brings that.
I'd be perfectly fine with Kindle or Hughes in this scenario. Kindle can disrupt with his speed. He can be a difference maker across from Clay Jr.
 
15 New York Giants - Rolando McClain ILB AlabamaWhat a gift this would be for the Giants.16 Tennessee - Joe Haden CB FloridaThey had the league's worst pass defense last year.
These 2 picks here would be steals.
 
Honda said:
Or they could/should trade up. I think they've painted themselves into the corner with their RB situation.
I think that's why the Whitehurst trade was nice for them. Now that they have the 40th pick in addition to the 28th pick, they can sit back there and grab whoever falls out of Best/Gerhart/Hardesty with their second rounder.
Wouldn't Gerhart or Hardesty be a reach with the 40th pick? I think they can one of those guys in the third. They do have an extra third from the Cromartie trade.
 
Honda said:
Or they could/should trade up. I think they've painted themselves into the corner with their RB situation.
I think that's why the Whitehurst trade was nice for them. Now that they have the 40th pick in addition to the 28th pick, they can sit back there and grab whoever falls out of Best/Gerhart/Hardesty with their second rounder.
Wouldn't Gerhart or Hardesty be a reach with the 40th pick?
It really depends on what the Chargers think and on where they expect those guys to be drafted. Hardesty sort of fits the Donald Brown/Joseph Addai mold as a guy who could make a late surge and be picked earlier than expected. In a vacuum neither one of them is a great value at the 40 spot, but in the context of a playoff contender with an acute need for another body at RB, it could make sense.
 
I just have a hard time thinking that SD will add back to back offensive weapons when they need to improve the D.

12 Miami - Derrick Morgan DE Georgia Tech If he's there, he's the guy otherwise I think it's Graham.
I have hard time seeing how Jacksonville passes of him when in years past they have given up so much to get a DE. Also, I got the impression that Morgan would be best suited to a 43 defense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just have a hard time thinking that SD will add back to back offensive weapons when they need to improve the D.
Sometimes making your strength stronger is better for your team than improving your weakness,
12 Miami - Derrick Morgan DE Georgia Tech If he's there, he's the guy otherwise I think it's Graham.
I have hard time seeing how Jacksonville passes of him when in years past they have given up so much to get a DE. Also, I got the impression that Morgan would be best suited to a 43 defense.
Because they acquired Kampman and Harvey hasn't been the bust he's been made out to be. Morgan might be best in a 4-3, but I've read things that lead me to believe the Fins like him for a 3-4.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top