What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Name some buy lows on your Radars this off-season... (1 Viewer)

Nate Brleson was not terrible and if Branch has trouble getting back, i think Nate could be taken as a WR 4 or maybe even 5 in a 10-12 team legue...good value there.

 
Mark Clayton
I paid attention to Baltimore only a few games last year. Was Clayton's disappointment primarily injury related or is he not developing as expected?
I watched them....it was a combination of a lot of things....terrible QB play, DMason was the focus and targeted twice as much, the injury hurt him coming out of the gates and he bever seemed to get into a rhythm. He's an interesting guy this year. A lot depends on the QB resolution...also there will be competition for balls as Demetrius Williams should challenge, THeap will be back, QSypnewski developed, Darling came on a little, DMase is still there(though getting older). Bottom line is until they solve who's taking the snaps his development will continue to be hampered.
 
Swanson said:
Mark Clayton
I paid attention to Baltimore only a few games last year. Was Clayton's disappointment primarily injury related or is he not developing as expected?
I watched them....it was a combination of a lot of things....terrible QB play, DMason was the focus and targeted twice as much, the injury hurt him coming out of the gates and he bever seemed to get into a rhythm. He's an interesting guy this year. A lot depends on the QB resolution...also there will be competition for balls as Demetrius Williams should challenge, THeap will be back, QSypnewski developed, Darling came on a little, DMase is still there(though getting older). Bottom line is until they solve who's taking the snaps his development will continue to be hampered.
thanks a bunch for this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top