NFL Draft Trade Scenario (1 Viewer)

[MrPhoenix]

I presented the idea of the Rams trading up from #11 to Oakland's #7 should the 49ers skip over Vernon Davis in my mock draft. Now, if Tennessee grabs Vince Young at #3 and the Jets take Leinart at #4, this would mean that there would only be Cutler available as a bonafide 1st round QB.

Now, I know Al Davis has a hard-on for Vince Young reportedly, but if I recall, aren't the Raiders pretty high on Cutler? I could be wrong, I just remember reading something about that.

So, here you are, your Raiders are up to pick. Vernon Davis and Jay Cutler still sit available at #7. The Rams call you and want to offer this year's 1st and 3rd and next year's 4th for your #7 pick. What do you do?

1. Stay at #7 and take QB Jay Cutler.

2. Stay at #7 and take TE Vernon Davis.

3. Trade down to #11, grab extra picks and hopefully take QB Jay Cutler at #11.

I know there's a good stable of Raider fans here, so I should have no problem getting a response here.

 

[radballs.]

If those three are the only options, I go with Vernon Davis at 1.07.

 

[jurb26]

Where is the stay at #7 and draft a DB option?

 

[Riffraff]

Need a "none of the above" option for not taking a friggin' QB and going for defense where their holes are.

 

[diesel7982]

Or, whats actually going to happen.

Raiders trade up to 1.2, take Vincent Young.

 

[5Rings]

You might as well remove the "Take VD at #7" option.......as SF passing on him just is not going to happen....unless Bush or Mario falls to #6.

Sorry man.

 

[MrPhoenix]

You might as well remove the "Take VD at #7" option.......as SF passing on him just is not going to happen....unless Bush or Mario falls to #6.

Sorry man.

Hypothetical thinking down?Just a scenario, as I fully expect VD to go at #6.

 

[radballs.]

You might as well remove the "Take VD at #7" option.......as SF passing on him just is not going to happen....unless Bush or Mario falls to #6.

Sorry man.

When the Jets take Young at 1.4, someone nice will fall to the Raiders like Hawk.

 

[Cookiemonster]

Oakland does not need a QB as badly as everyone seems to think. Huff @ safety, Ngata @ DT, Hawk @ LB or Justice @ T seem more likely and they should have their choice picking 7th. Best case scenario, the Raiders trade w/ the Jets if Mario falls to the 4th.

 

[-OZ-]

You might as well remove the "Take VD at #7" option.......as SF passing on him just is not going to happen....unless Bush or Mario falls to #6.

Sorry man.

When the Jets take Young at 1.4, someone nice will fall to the Raiders like Hawk.

I'm starting to think that's a very reasonable expectation.The question might become which of Hawk or VD San Fran takes.

Or, whats actually going to happen.

Raiders trade up to 1.2, take Vincent Young.

How do you see Oakland putting that offer together?

 

[aDingoAteMyBaby]

Young is a smoke screen. The Raiders don't show their hand to the nation.... pretty much ever.

 

[the hairy scotsman]

Or, whats actually going to happen.

Raiders trade up to 1.2, take Vincent Young.

Right. If they trade up for a qb, or even take a qb, which seems unlikely at this point, it's going to be Young. They love him.

 

[the hairy scotsman]

You might as well remove the "Take VD at #7" option.......as SF passing on him just is not going to happen....unless Bush or Mario falls to #6. 

Sorry man. 

When the Jets take Young at 1.4, someone nice will fall to the Raiders like Hawk.

Seems like the Jets might not want Young, since only the OC watched his workout with the team.