Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Really I've seen a few people on Social media maybe not big people that aren't giving Hinkie credit. Like I said lets wait till the team reaches the playoffs and maybe wins a playoff game or series before crediting Hinkie. I give him credit for dumping the bad contracts.
yeah Sixers are in a nice spot they haven't been for a bit. They have options out there, and if they end up doing close to nothing, they still could be competitive (if healthy).
look at the trades Hinkie made and let me know that there are not GMs in the league who would make a dumb trade
nah, don't think so. we need to figure out a way to get some established players in here if we are going to consolidate these picks. just don't see enough upside in pick 5. we should probably be getting a PG, but we can do that at 3 and/or by just dropping back. Isaac could be interesting, I suppose, but not enough of a difference maker to risk it. plus, it just means another year earlier to have to pay a guy. if embiid goes down, we kind of need those picks plus 2019 in order to try to re-load. the process infinite.
I don't like the reach for monk at 3, or the fit for fox. Jackson (who may be the best player in the draft and who has the highest upside), would be great at 3. Means we could also get monk at 5. Jackson+monk this year would be awesome and worth giving up approximately picks 6 and 12 next year
Saric? No. Sac 19 hell yea. Just a pick. We can get more. Even though that may be a top 5 one.
Ya I had read Saric yesterday but that seems to be no longer a thing. Just picks.
So do we. Okafor has little value, and for us to still keep the Lakers and Kings picks are huge. Our pick should be between 10-15 next year.
It's logical. Boston is also gonna try for all they can get. Wonder how much we are willing to give
Yep. From the sounds of it, parameters are all set and done. Celtics will draft Fultz. If LA drafts Jackson, no deal will happen. If LA drafts Ball, Philly takes Jackson and they instantly announce the trade.
hmm, i don't really like that. nerve-wracking week.Deamon said:
He didn't shoot well. Seemed tired. They really didn't care about how he looked in this workout. They wanted to make sure the medical stuff checked out and get another interview with him.
They have it on the WIP FB page. I suggest you not watch it if you have any inkling of doubt about this trade.
lol
Wonder if we can make a push for Hayward... he should be the top target.
JetMaxx said:
Ya I still don't know which is better for us... getting the Lakers pick or keeping the Kings pick. Obviously Lakers at #1 is the dream but not a reality. That Lakers pick landing between 6-8 is probably the best scenario. Any lower than 8 and I'd want the Kings pick. So cheering for them to end up between picks 4-8Insein said:
If it were to go down, that trade would make it likely we get a mediocre pick in a bad 2018 draft and then hand Boston a high pick in a loaded 2019 class.
Is 2019 that much more loaded that 2018? Also, how sure are we that in TWO full seasons, the Kings will be a bottom 5 team? I know they don't have much but lots can happen in 2 years. Also the value of, say, pick 6 in 2018 is better than in 2019. I guess it doesn't really matter what happens with that pick, I'm good either way.
