What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
This poindexter back at it?  Figured he would go away after Trump wedgied him in the primary. 
Silver has done fairly well among pollsters actually:

Nate Silver@NateSilver538 May 11

538's "Polls-only" model is up to 52/57 (91%) correct "calls" this year, and "polls-plus" up to 51/57 (89%), after Sanders's win in WV.

Nate Silver@NateSilver538 May 11


Our forecasts have also been well-calibrated, meaning that underdogs win about as often as they're "supposed" to.

 
Silver gave Trump like a 1% chance to get the nomination.
Weirdly enough Silver didn't realize that a guy who opened at under 10% with Jindal would be getting the biggest free air time giveaway in American political history.

Now Trump says he doesn't watch CNN anymore because it seems like ever since he wrapped up the nom they're not as nice to him anymore. Who could've seen that happening either, right?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"The People reporter taped the phone call, grew suspicious upon relistening to it, and then played it for New York Post gossip columnist Cindy Adams."

Cindy Adams is friendly with the Clintons, btw.

If Trump is playing chess, then the Clintons are playing that multi-level space chess that Spock played on Star Trek.
What are you insinuating?  That the Clinton's had a copy of the tape?  Because their friend listened to it 25 years ago?  Don't you think it would have been reported if she also made a copy of it for her?

 
What are you insinuating?  That the Clinton's had a copy of the tape?  Because their friend listened to it 25 years ago?  Don't you think it would have been reported if she also made a copy of it for her?
Please explain again why you want a guy who spreads disinformation about himself to the press to be president?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please explain again why you want a guy who spreads disinformation about himself to the press to be president?
What do you mean by disinformation?  That 25 years ago he called People Magazine and pretended to be his spokesman?  Talking about crap in his personal life that doesn't amount to a hill of beans?  People don't care about this.  Most think it's hysterical.

 
What do you mean by disinformation?  That 25 years ago he called People Magazine and pretended to be his spokesman?  Talking about crap in his personal life that doesn't amount to a hill of beans?  People don't care about this.  Most think it's hysterical.
It's hysterical because it's not Obama or Hilary. Then there would be an investigation into it.

 
What do you mean by disinformation?  That 25 years ago he called People Magazine and pretended to be his spokesman?  Talking about crap in his personal life that doesn't amount to a hill of beans?  People don't care about this.  Most think it's hysterical.
Yes...that was the only time he spread disinformation.

:lmao:

 
What do you mean by disinformation?  That 25 years ago he called People Magazine and pretended to be his spokesman?  Talking about crap in his personal life that doesn't amount to a hill of beans?  People don't care about this.  Most think it's hysterical.
First of all that was not the only instance:

http://www.northjersey.com/news/reporters-say-they-suspected-a-donald-trump-alter-ego-back-in-1985-1.1583949

Secondly, it was your point that Donald himself "leaked" the tape. Ok, then he lies about it being him. That is an explicit example of planting information in the press and then creating false information about it on the back end. Why would you want someone who does that as president?

 
First of all that was not the only instance:

http://www.northjersey.com/news/reporters-say-they-suspected-a-donald-trump-alter-ego-back-in-1985-1.1583949

Secondly, it was your point that Donald himself "leaked" the tape. Ok, then he lies about it being him. That is an explicit example of planting information in the press and then creating false information about it on the back end. Why would you want someone who does that as president?
yeah......but there's gonna be a wall.

 
Gee I dunno, "Renegade JEW" just sounds so.... what's the word for it...
Racist?  Once again Saint, the article was written by a Jew, who describes himself as such in the last paragraph.  What other word or phrase should he have used?  "descendant of Abraham"?   :lol:

 
Racist?  Once again Saint, the article was written by a Jew, who describes himself as such in the last paragraph.  What other word or phrase should he have used?  "descendant of Abraham"?   :lol:
Republican leader?

What does his Jewishness have anything to do with it?

And if the writer chose running interference for his Glorious Leader over basic decency and professionalism, well then he has lost something there hasn't he.

 
First of all that was not the only instance:

http://www.northjersey.com/news/reporters-say-they-suspected-a-donald-trump-alter-ego-back-in-1985-1.1583949

Secondly, it was your point that Donald himself "leaked" the tape. Ok, then he lies about it being him. That is an explicit example of planting information in the press and then creating false information about it on the back end. Why would you want someone who does that as president?
Honest answer - I don't care.  Everyone lies.  Every damn one of them.  And if you think otherwise you are lying to yourself.  The only time I care about this crap is when it amounts to something serious.  Hillary's server - that is serious.  That may have compromised sources and endangered lives.  Bill Clinton's womanizing?  I don't care about that.

In the end people are going to vote for the person who they think is going to get #### done for them.  These "scandals" sell newspapers but they don't really move the needle all that much.

 
Honest answer - I don't care.  Everyone lies.  Every damn one of them.  And if you think otherwise you are lying to yourself.  The only time I care about this crap is when it amounts to something serious.  Hillary's server - that is serious.  That may have compromised sources and endangered lives.  Bill Clinton's womanizing?  I don't care about that.

In the end people are going to vote for the person who they think is going to get #### done for them.  These "scandals" sell newspapers but they don't really move the needle all that much.
Uhm, not really. This is a fresh new take on dishonest politicians: by your assessment Trump has planted a true story about something he did more than once, then lied about it, then ran from it, and now is lying about it some more.

So you're advocating we elect this guy who will do this with immigration, health care, foreign policy.... what the hell do you think he's going to do for you considering he's lying as a matter of strategy?

He ain't building no wall, Adelson doesn't give away million dollar bills for free. So we know Trump has already lied to you about that. More to come I guess.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/05/latest-superhero-blockbuster-bill-kristol-wins-coveted-role-renegade-jew


In New Superhero Blockbuster, Bill Kristol Wins Coveted Role of "Renegade Jew"


By Kevin Drum

Well, here's an interesting headline from the Trump worshippers at Breitbart. "Renegade Jew" is probably not an attack that Bill Kristol gets often. But maybe Breitbart can back up the charge?

The article, it turns out, is by prolific nutcase David Horowitz, who finally has this to say in the final paragraph about the Iran deal

"Hillary Clinton and all but a handful of Democrats have supported this treachery from start to finish. Kristol is now one of their allies....To weaken the only party that stands between the Jews and their annihilation, and between America and the forces intent on destroying her, is a political miscalculation so great and a betrayal so profound as to not be easily forgiven."

Normally I'd say that writers don't write their own headlines, but in this case I suspect that Horowitz's only complaint is that it's a little too milquetoast.

 
Republican leader?

What does his Jewishness have anything to do with it?

And if the writer chose running interference for his Glorious Leader over basic decency and professionalism, well then he has lost something there hasn't he.
Saint, did you read the article?  It is a Jewish writer who is talking about another Jew not supporting policies that he feels are in the best interests of Israel.  It's not an anti-Semitic thing at all.  Breitbart courts Jews - they are a huge part of their base.  You are reading way too much into this.

 
Saint, did you read the article?  It is a Jewish writer who is talking about another Jew not supporting policies that he feels are in the best interests of Israel.  It's not an anti-Semitic thing at all.  Breitbart courts Jews - they are a huge part of their base.  You are reading way too much into this.
What does his Jewishness have anything to do with it?

 
Honest answer - I don't care.  Everyone lies.  Every damn one of them.  And if you think otherwise you are lying to yourself.  The only time I care about this crap is when it amounts to something serious.  Hillary's server - that is serious.  That may have compromised sources and endangered lives.  Bill Clinton's womanizing?  I don't care about that.

In the end people are going to vote for the person who they think is going to get #### done for them.  These "scandals" sell newspapers but they don't really move the needle all that much.
The is what is so funny about the Trump haters. They are all upset about Trump "lying". I wonder if they still can't sleep at night knowing that Bill said he didn't know getting a BJ counted as sex. 

 
The is what is so funny about the Trump haters. They are all upset about Trump "lying". I wonder if they still can't sleep at night knowing that Bill said he didn't know getting a BJ counted as sex. 
LS then say you're for destroying the system - ok - but don't claim you're ever getting any policy objectives out of this guy.

 
Uhm, not really. This is a fresh new take on dishonest politicians: by your assessment Trump has planted a true story about something he did more than once, then lied about it, then ran from it, and now is lying about it some more.

So you're advocating we elect this guy who will do this with immigration, health care, foreign policy.... what the hell do you think he's going to do for you considering he's lying as a matter of strategy?

He ain't building no wall, Adelson doesn't give away million dollar bills for free. So we know Trump has already lied to you about that. More to come I guess.
Another honest answer - it does concern me a bit.  If I could have Trump's policies with Bernie's integrity, I'd take it in a heartbeat.  Can't have it all I guess.

 
LS then say you're for destroying the system - ok - but don't claim you're ever getting any policy objectives out of this guy.
We never get any policy objectives from anyone. Is Hillary putting coal miners out of work or revitalizing appalachia? 

That is the point everything any presidential candidate says is BS because they are not the lawmakers Congress and the Senate is, so it is ALL lies. What you are voting on is how they will wield veto power and perform as a figurehead. Trump will be moderate in his veto power and as a CEO is the ultimate pro America figurehead. 

That is what people are not getting about Trump supporters. All of these people are liars and it is comical when the left gets all bent because they think their gal isn't. 

:potkettle:

 
It is cute, though, that the Left media rags are all running with the story that Breitbart is now anti-Semitic.  What's even more comical is that "anti-Semitism" is one of a handful of tags that Breitbart uses to file it's news articles.  Take a look at how anti-Semitic Breitbart is. :lol:   http://www.breitbart.com/tag/anti-semitism/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unrest at Islands Brygge in Copenhagen resulted Friday in several arrests.

See more photos on LocalEyes.

Riots at Islands Brygge in Copenhagen resulted Friday evening in several arrests. The riots occurred first between factions and later between the crowd and the police.

The good weather had attracted around 300 people to the grassy areas. Among those in attendance were also several groups, according to the Copenhagen Police vagtchef could not agree.

Police got a notification that there was a prelude to fighting and arrived at the scene shortly after 19:30.

- Then it developed into that crowd formed a common front against the police and threw bottles, says duty officer to TV 2nd

It ended with six arrests for disorderly conduct. The police can, however, shortly before 21:30 indicate that the situation was under control and that the officers slowly were leaving the area.
Another link:

"There has been tumultuous conditions at Islands Brygge, where between 200 and 300 young people in the different groups were smoking in fights with each other. So we had to come out with more police to get it stopped, "said duty officer at Copenhagen police Henrik Brix to BT.

"It is some groups of young people - both ethnic origin and of Danish origin - who do not like each other. And so we had to move out to get the situation under control. We came to a good number, and then started some of the young people and throw things, and so we had more officers of place. But now there's hoof. We have arrested six people in total, "explains Henrik Brix.

He says that the Islands Brygge is a popular place for many people when there is good weather. Families dominate the day, while young people predominate in the evening. And it is in this context that several groups are smoked in fights.

 
If you want to think that Trump's position that he'd like to see a peace deal struck between Israel and the Palestinians somehow correlates to him not supporting Israel, you are welcome to that opinion.  Personally it's crap.  I've listened to countless speeches by the guy and he goes out of his way to say that he is unwavering in his support for Israel.  Not to mention the fact that the most important person in the guy's life, his daughter, is Jewish.  But believe what you want Saint.

 
It is cute, though, that the Left media rags are all running with the story that Breitbart is now anti-Semitic.  What's even more comical is that "anti-Semitism" is one of a handful of tags that Breitbart uses to file it's news articles.  Take a look at how anti-Semitic Breitbart is. :lol:   http://www.breitbart.com/tag/anti-semitism/


I am a Jew who has never been to Israel and has never been a Zionist in the sense of believing that Jews can rid themselves of Jew hatred by having their own nation state.
- David Horowitz.

Yeah, that's why Israel exists.

That's the entirety of what he says about Israel in his article.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pretty funny that Trump supporters openly admit they don't care if he lies or doesn't know anything about policy.

I mean it was pretty obvious anyway, but it's almost as if people are proud to be voting for the guy with zero qualifications for the job.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top