What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (7 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
At this point, our best bet is to hopefully bury Hilary in the debates and continue e-mail leaks to the point that:
How on earth can you expect him to bury her in the debates? This isn't the GOP primaries.  Do you think she's going to wilt because he calls her crooked Hillary? This isn't going to be one of his rally crowds. She's going to be blowing him out of the water with her knowledge. Meanwhile, he's going to try to make everything be about emails and Benghazi. Regardless of what the moderator's question was. The man truly has nothing to bring to the table. The debates are going to be embarrassing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No I'm not. I live in a blue state.

I would, if I lived in Florida or PA, vote Clinton, with a smile.  
Understood.  My only comment is that I think it is important that Trump lose by as much of the popular and electoral vote as possible in order to repudiate the vile things he has stood for during this election.

 
I'm guessing your rude and abusive behavior you show online is a result of your own mental and social shortcomings!

Here I was trying to have an intelligent conversation with a bunch of guys who aren't capable! Amazing.

 
Do you want me to explain to you what a corporate inversion is? Or will you just get frustrated with the concept and start throwing insults at me?

:lmao:

 
I can't believe how much time I've wasted on numbskulls who don't understand Economics!

No wonder you're voting for Hilary.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
As someone with a B.S. in psychology and a B.A. in economics (both before my J.D. degree), I feel qualified to talk about both numbskulls and people who don't understand economics.  Want to know who fits in both of those categories?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A someone with a B.S. in psychology and a B.A. in economics (both before my J.D. degree), I feel qualified to talk about both numbskulls and people who don't understand economics.  Want to know who fits in both of those categories?
Unless you're actually going to use substance and not insult me, I'll pass. I'm for people who can put concepts into comprehensive written form without ad hominem.

You can't just laugh at somebody and say they're wrong without explaining why they're wrong and what the correct concept is.

That's what a 10 year old does or somebody who is full of crap and doesn't want to admit they don't know what they're talking about.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unless you're actually going to use substance, I'll pass. I'm for people who can put concepts into comprehensive written form without ad hominem.

You can't just laugh at somebody and say they're wrong without explaining why they're wrong and what the correct concept is.

That's what a 10 year old does or somebody who is full of crap and doesn't want to admit they don't know what they're talking about.
When have you done anything else? Anytime anyone disagrees with you, you cry "ad hominem" like it's some magical incantation.  Pretty gutsy after calling other people numbskulls, don't you think?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unless you're actually going to use substance, I'll pass. I'm for people who can put concepts into comprehensive written form without ad hominem.

You can't just laugh at somebody and say they're wrong without explaining why they're wrong and what the correct concept is.

That's what a 10 year old does or somebody who is full of crap and doesn't want to admit they don't know what they're talking about.
You haven't outlined any economic concepts that have anything to do with Trump. You said you were going to school us on economics, talked about an 8 year cycle, then almost immediately realized you were talking out your ### and followed it up with "nobody can predict"...

Then when I laughed at it, you accused me of resorting to insults and then promptly insulted me.

Now you're bringing up corporate inversion because it's maybe? a topic you know something about? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So glad instead of showcasing your Economics knowledge which could have easily shut me up, you went on some editorial tangent about ad hominem.

Pretty much proving my point that you guys either can't hang or can't prove my theories wrong.

 
So do you want to discuss econometrics?  How are you at applying differential equations to economic data?
How about we start with the various concepts I've discussed in this thread that nobody has been able to discuss or dispute.

I feel that would be, you know, relevant...

 
Unless you're actually going to use substance and not insult me, I'll pass. I'm for people who can put concepts into comprehensive written form without ad hominem.

You can't just laugh at somebody and say they're wrong without explaining why they're wrong and what the correct concept is.

That's what a 10 year old does or somebody who is full of crap and doesn't want to admit they don't know what they're talking about.
This is like Trump complaining that people are not civil on social media.

Or me saying people shouldn't respond to those who troll here.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So glad instead of showcasing your Economics knowledge which could have easily shut me up, you went on some editorial tangent about ad hominem.

Pretty much proving my point that you guys either can't hang or can't prove my theories wrong.
You have yet to lay out any actual theory.

 
Go ahead, vote Hilary and see what happens when you take money out of an economy that hasn't seen a 3% growth in GDP over 8 years and has a stock market that is overvalued.


I can't see it lasting another 3 years. It depends on the policies of our next President.

If we allow businesses to continue to grow by lowering taxes, we might be able to coast out a marginal recession and begin to see a steady rise again.

If we jack up taxes on everyone to repair infrastructure and offer more welfare, it will take a lot of money out of the economy, the people, and businesses.

Raise minimum wage too, that will only inflate the bubble more.
Sooooo, you're still buying in to trickle-down economics?

 
proninja said:
I guess I shouldn't be shocked that the most outspoken Trump supporter can't spell Gary
More sophisticated, relevant, hard hitting critically thinking from the anti-Trump supporters.

OMG! YOU DIDN'T PUT A PERIOD AT THE END OF YOUR SENTENCE! DON'T  YOU KNOW THAT SENTENCES END WITH PUNCTUATION?!?!

 
Just to update you all on the campaign loan situation - I couldn't find any articles online reporting whether or not he actually followed through on his promise to forgive his campaign loans, so I looked through the actual FEC filings and it turns out he did file a letter for giving all loans he made to the campaign. This was as if July 21 iirc (already closed the page and it was a pain to find) but as of that date it was just over 40 million I think

So that should settle it that he can't just pay himself back

 
Eminence said:
Do you not realize the future of the nusiness cycle will be different under both Trump and Clinton?

What was your prediction, btw
I will bet my current and future net worth that the market will go down, and up, in the near future.

I guarantee I nail this call.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No substance, just insults, sad. You act just like Donald Trump the guy you hate!

The fact of the matter is you can't go toe-to-toe or even attempt to debate with me so you result to insults.

What a joke you are!
Did you just try to insult someone by saying they are acting like Trump? That's a new one. :lmao:

 
What is this fascination the Right has with rally attendance as evidence that polls are rigged?
Attendance and enthusiasm must be reported by dishonest media. Attendance = votes, and enthusiastic attendance = bonus votes. Like strenuous objection. Democracy!

 
That Manafort Times article is jaw-dropping.

Trump should be distancing himself from Manafort now.  It's the only same thing to do.

Which means....

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top