fantasycurse42
Footballguy Jr.
Hard to say the current economy is more than smoke and mirrors if we can't hike a measly 25 basis points then, no?Leeroy Jenkins said:Possibly.
Hard to say the current economy is more than smoke and mirrors if we can't hike a measly 25 basis points then, no?Leeroy Jenkins said:Possibly.
Jerk alert!General Malaise said:Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh........he's.......doing.......his.........fantasy......football.....draft.........don't muddle his brain with.....you know......facts.
Jerk is a tug, a tug is a boat, a boat's made of wood, a wood is a forest, a forest is nature and nature is beautiful. Thanks for calling me beautiful, Emi!Jerk alert!
Bring.back.the.draft.robot.!CBusAlex said:I. Think. He. Uses. The. Right. Amount. Of. Periods. Just. Not. Distributed. Evenly. Enough.
Wait, you're going to need to unpack that for me. If Obama could destroy ISIS by not holding back the generals and take that issue off of the table so Trump couldn't rant about needing to limit the immigrants coming into the country (his main campaign point), you're saying that hurts Hillary? It seems to me that destroying ISIS now would cut Trump off at the knees. The only way it would help him is that his hands would finally be proportional to the rest of his body.Ditka Butkus said:My contention is you all mocking my posting style tells me you are on the ropes and desperate....Your boy got caught with his pants down....and yes he/she is not going to let our generals go full war as they would need to do to defeat ISIS, when the creator of ISIS, Hillary is campaigning for the presidency. In regards to helping Hillary, if you mean Trump catching her in the Polls than yes..
Please refrain from calling posters names. The guy who "owns' this thread doesn't approve of it.Jerk alert!
Oh yeah, I should report Emi for calling me a jerk. That is not excellent. BRB....Please refrain from calling posters names. The guy who "owns' this thread doesn't approve of it.
Better question, what percentage of the Trump supporters even have enough hair to make a "man bun"?I wonder what percentage of the Hillary wonks in this thread have "man buns?"
It's probably too late.Ditka Butkus said:Tim once in awhile I agree with you ...and this is one of those times...Why we are hell bent on reigniting the cold war is beyond me...
Well hey, who's better at disappearing people than the Clintons?And that eventually he disappears so that we can forge a new agreement with Russia, who really could be a useful ally.
I don't think it's fair to those of us with limited dome coverage to automatically associate us with the great pumpkin.Better question, what percentage of the Trump supporters even have enough hair to make a "man bun"?
The only way to "contain" ISIS is a continual ground attack....Do you really think the killing of our G.I's would be helpful toward the Democrats staying in the White House...Wait, you're going to need to unpack that for me. If Obama could destroy ISIS by not holding back the generals and take that issue off of the table so Trump couldn't rant about needing to limit the immigrants coming into the country (his main campaign point), you're saying that hurts Hillary? It seems to me that destroying ISIS now would cut Trump off at the knees. The only way it would help him is that his hands would finally be proportional to the rest of his body.
I am working on it, currently in that middle stage of growing your hair out where it looks pretty sloppy and a hat is your best friend.Better question, what percentage of the Trump supporters even have enough hair to make a "man bun"?
So, what Trump is actually saying is that HE intends to have more G.I.s killed and he's passing the buck by saying he's going to have the generals figure out what to do? What a wonderfully PC and/or cowardly thing for him to do!The only way to "contain" ISIS is a continual ground attack....Do you really think the killing of our G.I's would be helpful toward the Democrats staying in the White House...
All of these except his small hands/anatomy are completely within his control. And no one would be making jokes about his hands except that one time some obscure article mentioned it and he couldn't let it go.Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.
Because only one of those two people is running for President of the United States and asking people to evaluate him to determine if he projects the image that's suitable for that office?Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.
My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?
All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small penis, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.
Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
He didn't discount it for her, he's just overcharging his own campaign.Has this been posted yet?
Trump held fundraiser for Florida Attorney General after she dropped investigation into Trump University
Previously it was known that Trump "donated" $25K to the AG (after which the AG coincidentally dropped the investigation into Trump U).
Now it looks like Trump's involvement went even deeper -- not only did he help her with a fundraiser at Trump's Mar-a-Lago mansion, but he also gave her a discounted rate on the room rental ($4,855, compared to the $140,000 that Trump currently charges his own campaign for similar events).
I posted about this months ago and Dikta Butkus was kind enough to inadvertently bring it up a few hours ago. I think others have mentioned it too.Has this been posted yet?
Trump held fundraiser for Florida Attorney General after she dropped investigation into Trump University
Previously it was known that Trump "donated" $25K to the AG (after which the AG coincidentally dropped the investigation into Trump U).
Now it looks like Trump's involvement went even deeper -- not only did he help her with a fundraiser at Trump's Mar-a-Lago mansion, but he also gave her a discounted rate on the room rental ($4,855, compared to the $140,000 that Trump currently charges his own campaign for similar events).
The fact that you need to ask this is quite frankly pretty disturbing.My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?
Pretty sure everyone does better when you aren't around.... just sayingThe less time I spend in here the better Trump seems to do in the polls...just saying.
You really dit see the difference? Never mind the difference between people on the Internet mocking his hair vs a guy wanting to be President.Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.
My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?
All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.
Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
I have said this many times, a President/Presidential candidate has to be above it all. Do you see Hillary attack everybody that says something awful to her? No! She would be talking 24/7 about all the attacks and still miss some.Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.
My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?
All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.
Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
The words he uses?Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.
My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?
All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.
Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.
My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?
All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.
Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
But, he has the best words!!!The words he uses?![]()
Maybe the reason for the way he speaks is that even though he has the best words, he thinks "use 'em, you lose 'em"But, he has the best words!!!
The Enemy Within excerptroadkill1292 said:It's like a conversation between a pair of diametrically opposed and overly medicated Captain Kirks.
You serious, Clark?Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.
My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?
All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.
Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
, but it's almost difficult to watch.A great deal of time! You wouldn't believe how much time believe me.He can't even say how much time he's spending on security issues.
Call it what you want but...I'm fairly sure if either Presidential candidate asked the Generals that is what they would recommend. That is what they always recommend.So, what Trump is actually saying is that HE intends to have more G.I.s killed and he's passing the buck by saying he's going to have the generals figure out what to do? What a wonderfully PC and/or cowardly thing for him to do!