What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ditka Butkus said:
My contention is you all mocking my posting style tells me you are on the ropes and desperate....Your boy got caught with his pants down....and yes he/she is not going to let our generals go full war as they would need to do to defeat ISIS, when the creator of ISIS, Hillary is campaigning for the presidency. In regards to helping Hillary, if you mean Trump catching her in the Polls than yes..
Wait, you're going to need to unpack that for me.  If Obama could destroy ISIS by not holding back the generals and take that issue off of the table so Trump couldn't rant about needing to limit the immigrants coming into the country (his main campaign point), you're saying that hurts Hillary?  It seems to me that destroying ISIS now would cut Trump off at the knees.  The only way it would help him is that his hands would finally be proportional to the rest of his body.

 
Ditka Butkus said:
Tim once in awhile I agree with you ...and this is one of those times...Why we are hell bent on reigniting the cold war is beyond me...
It's probably too late.

So far as I can see, the minute the Soviet Union collapsed all of the countries surrounding Russia were suddenly independent and asked to join NATO, and then offered to buy weapons from us. Naturally Boeing and Lockheed and all the rest were eager to sell, so they talked the State Department into it beginning with Bush Sr, then Clinton, then Bush Jr. We sold them all weapons and invited most of them to join NATO, and all the while Russia watched this and got pissed off. This has been going on for 25 years, and now we're in a situation where they might want some of their previous territory back. 

Trump is correct to point out the danger for us of this situation, and the long term stupidity of what we've done. But his statement that perhaps we wouldn't defend our NATO allies over there is dishonorable. We HAVE to defend them if they're attacked. So now we're caught and we can only hope that Putin is smart enough not to ultimately test us. And that eventually he disappears so that we can forge a new agreement with Russia, who really could be a useful ally. 

 
Wait, you're going to need to unpack that for me.  If Obama could destroy ISIS by not holding back the generals and take that issue off of the table so Trump couldn't rant about needing to limit the immigrants coming into the country (his main campaign point), you're saying that hurts Hillary?  It seems to me that destroying ISIS now would cut Trump off at the knees.  The only way it would help him is that his hands would finally be proportional to the rest of his body.
The only way to "contain" ISIS is a continual ground attack....Do you really think the killing of our G.I's  would be helpful toward the Democrats staying in the White House...

 
Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.

My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?

All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.

Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Better question, what percentage of the Trump supporters even have enough hair to make a "man bun"?
I am working on it, currently in that middle stage of growing your hair out where it looks pretty sloppy and a hat is your best friend.

During the workday I have to use half a bottle of gel to keep it all in perfect place, a la Don Draper. 

I predict it will be long enough for a man bun by Trump's inauguration. 

 
The only way to "contain" ISIS is a continual ground attack....Do you really think the killing of our G.I's  would be helpful toward the Democrats staying in the White House...
So, what Trump is actually saying is that HE intends to have more G.I.s killed and he's passing the buck by saying he's going to have the generals figure out what to do? What a wonderfully PC and/or cowardly thing for him to do!

 
Has this been posted yet?

Trump held fundraiser for Florida Attorney General after she dropped investigation into Trump University

Previously it was known that Trump "donated" $25K to the AG (after which the AG coincidentally dropped the investigation into Trump U).

Now it looks like Trump's involvement went even deeper -- not only did he help her with a fundraiser at Trump's Mar-a-Lago mansion, but he also gave her a discounted rate on the room rental ($4,855, compared to the $140,000 that Trump currently charges his own campaign for similar events).

 
Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.
All of these except his small hands/anatomy are completely within his control. And no one would be making jokes about his hands except that one time some obscure article mentioned it and he couldn't let it go.

 
Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.

My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?

All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small penis, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.

Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
Because only one of those two people is running for President of the United States and asking people to evaluate him to determine if he projects the image that's suitable for that office?

And, if you don't know why you should care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter, maybe you should listen to the rest of the ad.

 
Has this been posted yet?

Trump held fundraiser for Florida Attorney General after she dropped investigation into Trump University

Previously it was known that Trump "donated" $25K to the AG (after which the AG coincidentally dropped the investigation into Trump U).

Now it looks like Trump's involvement went even deeper -- not only did he help her with a fundraiser at Trump's Mar-a-Lago mansion, but he also gave her a discounted rate on the room rental ($4,855, compared to the $140,000 that Trump currently charges his own campaign for similar events).
He didn't discount it for her, he's just overcharging his own campaign.

 
Has this been posted yet?

Trump held fundraiser for Florida Attorney General after she dropped investigation into Trump University

Previously it was known that Trump "donated" $25K to the AG (after which the AG coincidentally dropped the investigation into Trump U).

Now it looks like Trump's involvement went even deeper -- not only did he help her with a fundraiser at Trump's Mar-a-Lago mansion, but he also gave her a discounted rate on the room rental ($4,855, compared to the $140,000 that Trump currently charges his own campaign for similar events).
I posted about this months ago and Dikta Butkus was kind enough to inadvertently bring it up a few hours ago. I think others have mentioned it too.

I think this is the next thing up for Trump, and I think it'll do a bit of damage.  It seems to be the exact sort of pay for play thing he and others criticize Clinton for, except there's much stronger evidence that it actually happened here.  Especially it looks like he tried to hide the donation by illegally filtering it through his non-profit, and since he's essentially admitted to doing stuff like this in the past with his rhetoric about buying politicians.

If he doesn't get hammered on this way harder than Clinton was hit on the non-existent Foundation story ... I wouldn't know what to think. It also re-raises the Trump U scandal, which is a nice bit of synergy.

 
Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.

My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?

All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.

Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
You really dit see the difference? Never mind the difference between people on the Internet mocking his hair vs a guy wanting to be President.

 
Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.

My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?

All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.

Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
I have said this many times, a President/Presidential candidate has to be above it all. Do you see Hillary attack everybody that says something awful to her? No! She would be talking 24/7 about all the attacks and still miss some.

Trump has started to let some stuff go, but this week he has been attacking joe scarborough and mika brzezinski because he didn't like their reporting. Is that how his Presidency going to be like? A President can't take everything personally. And Trump has shown how unlikely it will be for him.

 
Trump U  :lmao:  

"A former employee of Trump University, who requested anonymity because he has a nondisclosure agreement, said that politics always played a role in how Trump University did business.

'All we had to do is stroke a check to the committee to re-elect [the state attorney general],” the individual said. “And the problems went away.'"

But Hillary had emails! And a foundation!

 
Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.

My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?

All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.

Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
The words he uses? :lmao:

 
Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.

My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?

All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.

Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
The words he uses? :lmao:
But, he has the best words!!!

 
Lots of Gary Johnson ads in my neck of the woods. Starts off with an image of Trump mocking the disabled reporter, then says something negative about Hillary.

My question is this, why should I care if Trump mocks a disabled reporter?

All the people telling me that it is offensive are the same people mocking Trump for his hair, his skin tone, his small hands, his small bit of anatomy, the way he talks, the words he uses, his facial expressions, etc.

Why is it okay to mock one person but not another?
You serious, Clark?

Trump chooses those aspects of his appearance (except the tiny fingers).  

 
Obama didn't do what the intelligence experts suggested. Trump was able to determine this from their body language during his classified briefings.

 
So, what Trump is actually saying is that HE intends to have more G.I.s killed and he's passing the buck by saying he's going to have the generals figure out what to do? What a wonderfully PC and/or cowardly thing for him to do!
Call it what you want but...I'm fairly sure if either Presidential candidate asked the Generals that is what they would recommend. That is what they always recommend.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top