What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You should hit the report button like you do 12 times a day IMO.  Actually should just report yourself, end it all now.  :thumbup:
Unlike yourself I have never been suspended or banned. Not even any warnings either (although perhaps I may have deserved some). Meanwhile you have been the one calling people names. Tsk Tsk.

17 minutes ago, Doctor Detroit said:

Good chance for you to act like a teenage girl and accuse someone of saying something they never said at the other forum.  JUMP ON THAT #### PUDMAN!!!!
 
Trump with all kinds of strange behavior today even for him: 

1. He asked a crowd in Iowa if any of them were NOT conservative Christians and then said, "there's a few; should we keep them?" (I figured he might break out into a Roger Waters riff: "Up against the wall!")

2. He hammered away at Hillary's health, talking about all of the days she's missed and claiming she was too exhausted to make it to her car (this is interesting, because on Monday night Trump looked like the exhausted one by the end) 

3. He accused Google of suppressing bad news about Hillary. 

4. Then on Bill O'Reilly's show he tripled down on Alicia Machado, claiming he had saved her job and she was a bad person and "a lot of trouble". 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump with all kinds of strange behavior today even for him: 

1. He asked a crowd in Iowa if any of them were NOT conservative Christians and then said, "there's a few; should we keep them?" (I figured he might break out into a Roger Waters riff: "Up against the wall!")

2. He hammered away at Hillary's health, talking about all of the day's she's missed and claiming she was too exhausted to make it to her car (this is interesting, because on Monday night Trump looked like the exhausted one by the end) 

3. He accused Google of suppressing bad news about Hillary. 

4. Then on Bill O'Reilly's show he tripped down on Alicia Machado, claiming he had saved her job and she was a bad person and "a lot of trouble". 
That is the one that is so weird to me. He brought it up on his own this morning on Fox and Friends and keeps returning to it. The press would have moved on from this by now, but he can't seem to let it go. There is someone wrong with this guy to keep focusing attention on something that in no way can help his campaign (or at least in any way that I can see).

 
That is the one that is so weird to me. He brought it up on his own this morning on Fox and Friends and keeps returning to it. The press would have moved on from this by now, but he can't seem to let it go. There is someone wrong with this guy to keep focusing attention on something that in no way can help his campaign (or at least in any way that I can see).
Remember he did the same thing with the judge and then with Khan. He can't let it go. 

 
That is the one that is so weird to me. He brought it up on his own this morning on Fox and Friends and keeps returning to it.
Just like you focus on imaginary things that make you feel better about yourself.  Not all that hard to understand, some people are just completely obtuse.  You actually have more in common with Trump than you'll ever know. 

 
1st off that sucks but can you also just don't throw anonymous  blanket accusation . If you are going to accuse people name names. 
I did name names. Your buddy Chauncey said that because I'm a fat, liberal pansy, I've got an unsatisfied daughter he can 'stick his d!ck in'. She's 4.

I sent him a PM here and he didn't answer. This was July. I let it go.  Now you Trump guys are at it again.  For what?  I've backed off here.  Why are you guys on my back?  Why do you guys talk about my family?  Why attack what I look like?  Why post about screwing my wife and daughter?  

 
You also forgot the comma before...too.  I'd like to think you hold a degree from Strayer U, but I think that would be presumptuous. 

 
Yeah, you're the guy who thinks he can point out grammatical and composition errors.  :lmao:
Originating in the legal profession, argument in the alternative is a strategy in which a lawyer advances several competing (and possibly mutually exclusive) arguments in order to pre-empt objections by his adversary, with the goal of showing that regardless of interpretation there is no reasonable conclusion other than the advocate's.

 
Originating in the legal profession, argument in the alternative is a strategy in which a lawyer advances several competing (and possibly mutually exclusive) arguments in order to pre-empt objections by his adversary, with the goal of showing that regardless of interpretation there is no reasonable conclusion other than the advocate's.
From twitter to wikipedia.  

Squisy internet resources, pretty much those two guys there. 

 
I did name names. Your buddy Chauncey said that because I'm a fat, liberal pansy, I've got an unsatisfied daughter he can 'stick his d!ck in'. She's 4.

I sent him a PM here and he didn't answer. This was July. I let it go.  Now you Trump guys are at it again.  For what?  I've backed off here.  Why are you guys on my back?  Why do you guys talk about my family?  Why attack what I look like?  Why post about screwing my wife and daughter?  
Trump guys are at it again? WTF?

 
Jrodicus said:
It would appear that emotion has gotten the better of you.   One of your sources is the same one I used to highlight the hurdle you must leap to believe that a tax break is a subsidy.  Ergo, I already acknowledged their definition, and their stipulations (which you are now dodging).  Another of your sources which you cite defines subsidy as a "a direct pecuniary aid furnished by a government to a private industrial undertaking, a charity organization, or the like" while yet another says that "Direct subsidies are those that involve a direct payment toward a particular group or industry."  So one says a subsidy has to be direct aid and another acknowledges that a direct subsidy involves actual cash payment.  A tax break would be an "indirect subsidy" which puts it at odds with your other source that a subsidy must be direct aid.  Your own sources don't agree!  Thank you for making my point, I guess.   You describe your willing decision to exchange taxes for services.  That is a direct contradiction to the hurdle that our mutual source referred to; "This requires the assumption that a person's or an entity's money belongs to the government." How can you make the willing decision to pay taxes if your money already belongs to the government? You are also making the strawman that I do not want to pay any taxes.  I have never said that; I have only stated that I don't believe it is right or effective for the government to take anyone's tax money and give it to non profit organizations, Planned Parenthood being one of them.  I don't think that they should give money to any churches (regardless of religion), gun rights groups (regardless of side), and so on. I might have a need for a fireman or police officer.  I benefit from a national defense system.  There are regulations and systems in place that protect me.  These things have real costs and I have no issues with taxes for these items. The "if you don't like then leave" argument is seriously the weakest comeback in the history of ever.  Would you tell the Black Lives Matter movement that if they don't like being shot by police then they should just leave?  How about those opposed to the 2nd amendment?  It's the law of the land - if you don't agree then move to Canada.  Oppose any war?  See ya.  Don't like something about anything in this country?  Adios. Seriously, it's a pretty weak stance and shows me that you don't mean to have a serious discussion.

What you're missing and overlooking is the fact that NPOs that we do in fact NEED operate far more efficiently with public dollars then they ever could with private dollars. Look at the average efficiency of any major charity...if more than 30-40% of their money is spent on the actual charitable work instead of on RAISING MORE MONEY, they are deemed to be efficient! The fact of the matter is that many people simply don't donate, but pretty much anyone can be made to pay taxes. Conservatives are forever telling us they prefer service provided for by non-governmental entities, that those entities are more responsive and efficient. Put together with the facts presented in my first paragraph, it it should naturally follow that taxpayer support of certain NPOs (like planned parenthood) would be an attractive compromise, no?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
can't help it......Schilling :lmao:

Nugent not available?
I jokingly used Nugent as the rights 2020 candidate in a conversation recently as I couldn't come up with anyone more absurd that Trump. But then again I thought the same with Palin.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did name names. Your buddy Chauncey said that because I'm a fat, liberal pansy, I've got an unsatisfied daughter he can 'stick his d!ck in'. She's 4.

I sent him a PM here and he didn't answer. This was July. I let it go.  Now you Trump guys are at it again.  For what?  I've backed off here.  Why are you guys on my back?  Why do you guys talk about my family?  Why attack what I look like?  Why post about screwing my wife and daughter?  
Holy hell

 
I did name names. Your buddy Chauncey said that because I'm a fat, liberal pansy, I've got an unsatisfied daughter he can 'stick his d!ck in'. She's 4.

I sent him a PM here and he didn't answer. This was July. I let it go.  Now you Trump guys are at it again.  For what?  I've backed off here.  Why are you guys on my back?  Why do you guys talk about my family?  Why attack what I look like?  Why post about screwing my wife and daughter?  
Because they truly are horrible people.

If Kim-Jong-un ran as the republican nominee they would vote for him as they are stuck in their us-against-them mindset.

 
Since we are close to watching Pumpkin Spice getting destroyed, I'm just going to start remind everyone of some of Trumps ignorance and creepiness in case people forgot---

Trumps talks about his daughter (Tiffs) Breasts...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3528887/Donald-Trump-talks-infant-daughter-Tiffany-s-breasts-uncovered-interview-1994.html

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He wants to bang his daughter Ivanka...
http://www.mediaite.com/online/donald-trump-wont-stop-joking-about-banging-his-daughter/

 
He calls women terrible names, on multiple occasions...
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/09/27/donald-trump-alicia-machado/91156610/

 
Good news for Team Trump- this Cuba story might divert some of the media attention on the Alicia Machado story. Should play great in Florida, too :thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He mocks disabled people...
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/11/26/donald-trump-mocks-reporter-with-disability-berman-sot-ac.cnn

 
He continues to double down on Iraq lies when audio proof exists...
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/26/trump-repeats-false-claim-that-he-was-opposed-to-the-iraq-war.html

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump with all kinds of strange behavior today even for him: 

1. He asked a crowd in Iowa if any of them were NOT conservative Christians and then said, "there's a few; should we keep them?" (I figured he might break out into a Roger Waters riff: "Up against the wall!")

2. He hammered away at Hillary's health, talking about all of the days she's missed and claiming she was too exhausted to make it to her car (this is interesting, because on Monday night Trump looked like the exhausted one by the end) 

3. He accused Google of suppressing bad news about Hillary. 

4. Then on Bill O'Reilly's show he tripled down on Alicia Machado, claiming he had saved her job and she was a bad person and "a lot of trouble". 
He's certainly no politician. At this point in the election, candidates are usually trying to broaden their base and pick up the undecided voters. Not Trump, he's still preaching exclusively to the people who were already set on voting for him.

 
He has screwed over people (Architects) he owes money to who provided him with service...
https://www.fastcodesign.com/3064121/the-architect-trump-screwed-over

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top