This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Of course. That's one of the many endearing things they do that make them deplorable.
It's more like weather machines - all those regulation free slave labor factories pouring out pollutants so we can by cheap computers, televisions, phones, lawn furniture, drywall, MAGA hats, etc. And the wonderful fossil fuel burning power plants that drive the factories of course.
"If you are an average person with an education and a genie offered you the chance to live in any country, at any time in the history of the world, you would be a moron not to pick the USA in 2016."
Well, if you answer that you're voting for The Donald, the pollster will call you a moron. Everybody knows that.
I mean, the measure was called the authorization for military force. It was, at the very least an explicit abdication of Congress' war powers.
This is the Trump thread. Trump is for all of these things:
I don't think that's necessarily true. There are a lot of Western European countries I would argue are just as good on a number of different factors.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
As a white person, sure, but I don't think there's a better place for non-white people than the U.S. (although Trump is trying to change that).
If you were going to born randomly into the country, I don't think there is much doubt the Nordic states would be a better choice. If you knew you would be upper middle class or better, you'd probably take the U.S..
1) Destroyed Afghanistan for 9/11 until Taliban is squashed
This is why a vote for anybody other than Hillary is dangerous. Trump is a threat to america and must be totally repudiated. This is not the time for some bull#### protest vote or to turn your nose up because you have your own bull#### standard. Trump is probably the worst candidate we have ever had -- certainly in the modern era. And he is inciting the worst in people.
Well then she's an idiot since you, me, and everybody else on this board knew that perfectly well at the time this legislation was being debated.
Putting aside the rest of it (a lot of which I don't agree with), this is a good example of a Trump-like simplistic solution to a very complicated problem that would make things far worse. If we were to cut off foreign aid to Pakistan it would weaken their government, and it's replacement would likely resemble the Taliban, which is really bad news considering that Pakistan has nuclear weapons.
Well that would obviously be bad too, but my biggest fear is that radicals would take over.
Bunch of libtard rags...Donald Trump Makes History With Zero Major Newspaper Endorsements
The Chicago Sun-Times reversed a 2012 decision to stop making presidential endorsements, explaining to its readers that “the best way to avert a train wreck is to wave a warning flag as soon as possible.”
Well yeah, which is the point about the discussions about regime change. It's contradictory to argue against regime change policy making and also against foreign aid when it's acknowledged that aid helps prevent destabilization.
I posted a quote from Kellyanne Conway (I think) after the first debate. When asked why Trump did/said a certain thing, "I'm sure one of the preppers told him not to do that but it probably went in one ear and out the other".
I really don't think there are people around to chronicle the books, this won't be like the Romney campaign where they had dozens of people around that had full access to do that. From what I understand his entourage is really only like 3 or 4 people and media has nearly no access between stops. It would be great, but there's nobody that really is there to do it.
Republicans who think for themselves can see the long term potential here. Even an awful candidate like Cruz or Pence would seem nice and normal compared to Trump, and Hillary shouldn't be too tough to beat after 4 years more years of obstruction and 12 straight years of a Democrat in the white house. It's not as if the appetite for change will be sated 4 years from now.
His whole thing about her resting all the time is really weird. Can't put my finger on what it is exactly other than just pure stupidity.
People who are on cocaine binges think it's weird that other people sleep.
Trump also has a history of making people sign NDAs and he will undoubtedly sue anyone and everyone who says anything negative about him to the press/public after this is over.
In that post 9/11 climate everyone knew it meant war. And she didn't think Bush AND Cheney wouldn't do it - she should have considered the actors as well. She was wrong.
It's a dominance thing. With a sprinkle of misogyny. He appears to be the one too soft to study.
One the one hand, you have to think he is practicing some...on the other his entire history says he isn't. I'm surprised the Republican establishment isn't publically putting more pressure on him since another crappy performance is probably going to submarine 1-4 Senators and a bunch of Reps up for re-election.
I'd almost guarantee that he's not practicing. Also, he's completely uncontrollable. I'm sure that they've been pushing hard behind the scenes on a ton of different issues -- "Just shut the eff up!!!!" being the most prominent LOL -- but hitting him in public would almost certainly result in him hitting back on Twitter, etc, and that's a really bad look right before the election. I have read in a few places that they're going to publicly start distancing themselves if (when) he makes a fool of himself yet again during Monday's debate, which I doubt, but would be very interesting if it actually happens. Imagine him spending the month directly prior to the election trashing his own party...
