What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow! What a comeback for Donald! That should be enough momentum for him to win this thing!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We can add the Dunning-Kruger effect to Trump's binder full of psychological ailments.

His core supporters think he is on their side because he criticizes Obama, but last night Hillary reminded millions of viewers that Trump criticized Reagan much in the same fashion in the 80s. It's the "I know more than the Generals do" type of attitude, which some think is just for show, but the truth is he really does believe he's better at everything than anyone else could possibly ever be.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone have a link to the moderator shushing the crowd when they broke out in laughter at his "nobody has more respect for women than me" line? :lmao:

 
This morning everybody seems to be talking about 3 comments by Trump: 

1. I'll keep you in suspense. 

2. Such a nasty woman. 

3. We need to get rid of the bad hombres. 

The media is making the most of #1, but I have a feeling "nasty woman" is going to hurt him the most. Suburban women and all that...

 
He directly answered very few questions, generally did a lot of dissembling (did he ever answer whether he would leave troops in Mosul if they defeated ISIS there?). Didn't even try to deny the Clinton accusation about Chinese steel used in his construction projects.

When asked if he would accept the results of the election, contrary to the VP and his own daughter, his laughable response was that he would keep everybody in suspense. Does he think Democracy is an episode of The Apprentice? That was a bad, bad, bad answer and is going to hurt him with the general electorate (of course the hard cases will eat it up).

* I thought Chris Wallace did a phenomenal job (especially on the questions which asked BOTH candidates tough questions and seemed very fair and impartial), by far the best of the four debates, three Presidential and one VP.       
I for one think this was a great answer. It encourages everyone to enthusiastically look forward to Trump's defeat so the suspense on how he handles it can finally be lifted! :excited:

 
This morning everybody seems to be talking about 3 comments by Trump: 

1. I'll keep you in suspense. 

2. Such a nasty woman. 

3. We need to get rid of the bad hombres. 

The media is making the most of #1, but I have a feeling "nasty woman" is going to hurt him the most. Suburban women and all that...
Are you kidding? Women, as a general rule, HATE each other. 

 
You guys are oblivious if you think hillary didn't take a hit last night.   A lot of people who dont really follow politics and only watch the debates or the highlights of the debates are learning more and more about these emails and the supposed paid instigators. That will hurt her.  And this perception that trump doesn't have a chance could keep a lot of people home.  Don't fumble this one out of the back of the end zone guys 

 
From what I saw, Trump did pretty well. He actually seemed prepared. 

But Hillary didn't stand for his BS in the slightest. She may as well have stood there with the Glengarry Glen Ross brass ball set. There's no doubt that the woman is nails.

 
You guys are oblivious if you think hillary didn't take a hit last night.   A lot of people who dont really follow politics and only watch the debates or the highlights of the debates are learning more and more about these emails and the supposed paid instigators. That will hurt her.  And this perception that trump doesn't have a chance could keep a lot of people home.  Don't fumble this one out of the back of the end zone guys 
Hillary didn't take a hit last night. 

 
By any objective measure, Hillary dunked on Trump. He actually held it together for the first 30 minutes, which seems to be the point where he starts to unravel. I will say he had at least 2 or 3 moments where he could've scored big points, but his total lack of discipline and self-control gave them away. Clinton, while not perfect by any means, was much stronger than at the town hall and turned in her strongest debate of the three. It was like a greatest hits of Trump attacks from the last 6 months. 

The biggest surprise for me, however, was Chris Wallace. While his questioning on social security was disingenuous and ridiculous, in general he did a commendable job keeping control and asked pretty fair and tough questions of both candidates. Go figure.

 
This morning everybody seems to be talking about 3 comments by Trump: 

1. I'll keep you in suspense. 

2. Such a nasty woman. 

3. We need to get rid of the bad hombres. 

The media is making the most of #1, but I have a feeling "nasty woman" is going to hurt him the most. Suburban women and all that...
At this point our concern should not be what hurts him the most in the polls. It should be the strong possibility that he will actually do what he says and refuse to concede and it will trigger violence and riots.

Here's what Trump said on election night in 2012 about Mitt Romney's defeat in a series of tweets. Keep in mind as you read this that these are about the defeat of someone he doesn't particularly like, and consider how much more severe the reaction will presumably be if HE is the loser:


He lost the popular vote by a lot and won the election. We should have a revolution in this country!


The phoney electoral college made a laughing stock out of our nation. The loser one! [sic]

We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!

Lets fight like hell and stop this great and disgusting injustice! The world is laughing at us.

More votes equals a loss...revolution!

This election is a total sham and a travesty. We are not a democracy!

Our country is now in serious and unprecedented trouble...like never before

The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy.
Again ... that's about MITT ROMNEY, who actually lost the popular vote by 4%/5 million votes in 2012. Imagine if he merely said this stuff on November 8, 2016 about his own defeat.  Now imagine how much worse it could get when he's the one taking the L instead of some politician he barely knows.


 
You guys act like he has no supporters. He wouldn't be here if he didn't...
His problem is, he never understood that he had to build on the base he had during the primaries. Rather than acting more Presidential and trying to mute his childish temperament, he was content to just get his existing base more fired up. Maybe he thinks if they REALLY, REALLY hate Hillary, they can vote twice.  He did nothing to gain any votes from undecided and/or independents.  Even his 'rigged' agenda is aimed at his base. He's content to see the same non-college educated white guys at his rallies. Worst run campaign in our country's history.

This is going to be a historical landslide.

 
Maybe I'm naive here, but I just don't see all that many Trumpkins actually doing anything even if he refuses to concede. I think cowardice is a defining trait of most hardcore Trump supporters.

 
By any objective measure, Hillary dunked on Trump. He actually held it together for the first 30 minutes, which seems to be the point where he starts to unravel.
This is why Hillary always has that confident grin going. She understands how hard his team tries to coach him before these debates. She knows that he's going to start off being respectful and 'Presidential'.  But she also knows his maturity and temperament. She controls him like a marionette. She understands that she's in control and can get under his skin anytime she wants to and send him back to unraveled Donald.  IO bet she would agree to debate every night of the week until the election. She absolutely owns him on the stage.

 
At this point our concern should not be what hurts him the most in the polls. It should be the strong possibility that he will actually do what he says and refuse to concede and it will trigger violence and riots.

Here's what Trump said on election night in 2012 about Mitt Romney's defeat in a series of tweets. Keep in mind as you read this that these are about the defeat of someone he doesn't particularly like, and consider how much more severe the reaction will presumably be if HE is the loser:


Again ... that's about MITT ROMNEY, who actually lost the popular vote by 4%/5 million votes in 2012. Imagine if he merely said this stuff on November 8, 2016 about his own defeat.  Now imagine how much worse it could get when he's the one taking the L instead of some politician he barely knows.
Eh I'm starting to think Trump's crappy performances in the debates and the inevitability of his loss are going to depress enthusiasm. I don't think we'll see any pitchforks or bus turnings.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
His problem is, he never understood that he had to build on the base he had during the primaries. Rather than acting more Presidential and trying to mute his childish temperament, he was content to just get his existing base more fired up. Maybe he thinks if they REALLY, REALLY hate Hillary, they can vote twice.  He did nothing to gain any votes from undecided and/or independents.  Even his 'rigged' agenda is aimed at his base. He's content to see the same non-college educated white guys at his rallies. Worst run campaign in our country's history.

This is going to be a historical landslide.
Is it that he didn't understand it, or that he simply had no way to do it, nowhere to go?

Like the Republicans in 1964 and the Democrats in 1972, the Republicans this year chose a candidate far outside of the mainstream. When that happens, it's almost impossible to reclaim the center.

 
By any objective measure, Hillary dunked on Trump. He actually held it together for the first 30 minutes, which seems to be the point where he starts to unravel. I will say he had at least 2 or 3 moments where he could've scored big points, but his total lack of discipline and self-control gave them away. Clinton, while not perfect by any means, was much stronger than at the town hall and turned in her strongest debate of the three. It was like a greatest hits of Trump attacks from the last 6 months. 

The biggest surprise for me, however, was Chris Wallace. While his questioning on social security was disingenuous and ridiculous, in general he did a commendable job keeping control and asked pretty fair and tough questions of both candidates. Go figure.


It's already forgotten but what I find funny about that question about controlling entitlements - which generated the 'horrible woman' mutter - was that Hillary's response was Paul Ryanesque and Trump's response was that growth would pay for entitlements which is the classic liberal Democratic response.

eta - what's been lost in this is that we have often in this seen a Republican presidential candidate running to the left of the Democrat.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I appreciated Donald's firm grasp on what a late-term abortion is. Pretty sure ripping the baby out the day before it's due to be born is called a C-section.

 
Maybe I'm naive here, but I just don't see all that many Trumpkins actually doing anything even if he refuses to concede. I think cowardice is a defining trait of most hardcore Trump supporters.
I don't think they'll actually march on Washington because they're scared of minorities, plus they'll probably run out of S'mores-flavored Schnapps before they get here.  But I could see stuff going on at or near state government buildings that certify results they don't like.

In any event, the fact that we're even having this conversation is the story of this election/

 
This morning everybody seems to be talking about 3 comments by Trump: 

1. I'll keep you in suspense. 

2. Such a nasty woman. 

3. We need to get rid of the bad hombres. 

The media is making the most of #1, but I have a feeling "nasty woman" is going to hurt him the most. Suburban women and all that...
Anybody who would care about the use of an inelegant adjective to describe Hillary Clinton was never voting for Trump anyway.  Do you really think there's a suburban housewife out there who is thinking to herself "Donald was quoted out of context on the whole 'grab them by the #####' thing, and to be fair his daughter really was a nice piece of ###, but his use of the word 'nasty' is a bridge too far!"  Come on.

On the other hand, the part about not accepting the results of an election is -- I think -- completely unprecedented and ought to be (yet another) disqualifier for Trump. 

 
At this point our concern should not be what hurts him the most in the polls. It should be the strong possibility that he will actually do what he says and refuse to concede and it will trigger violence and riots.

Here's what Trump said on election night in 2012 about Mitt Romney's defeat in a series of tweets. Keep in mind as you read this that these are about the defeat of someone he doesn't particularly like, and consider how much more severe the reaction will presumably be if HE is the loser:


Again ... that's about MITT ROMNEY, who actually lost the popular vote by 4%/5 million votes in 2012. Imagine if he merely said this stuff on November 8, 2016 about his own defeat.  Now imagine how much worse it could get when he's the one taking the L instead of some politician he barely knows.
my biggest fear isn't 2016, it's 2020.

Trump now has a bully pulpit.  No one paid any serious attention to him in 2012.  Now, he has what...40% of the UP population ready to eat whatever BS he spoon feeds them?  

What happens if the Republicans find a decent candidate in 4 years and actually give Hillary a run?  What happens when the election is close and Trump uses the media comglomerate he will build to proclaim "rigged election"?  That's when the pitch forks come out.

 
Anybody who would care about the use of an inelegant adjective to describe Hillary Clinton was never voting for Trump anyway.  Do you really think there's a suburban housewife out there who is thinking to herself "Donald was quoted out of context on the whole 'grab them by the #####' thing, and to be fair his daughter really was a nice piece of ###, but his use of the word 'nasty' is a bridge too far!"  Come on.

On the other hand, the part about not accepting the results of an election is -- I think -- completely unprecedented and ought to be (yet another) disqualifier for Trump. 
I don't think the "nasty woman" comment is out of the ordinary for him, but I did find it amusing in that it came not more than 10 minutes after he once again claimed no one respects women more than he does.

 
I don't think they'll actually march on Washington because they're scared of minorities, plus they'll probably run out of S'mores-flavored Schnapps before they get here.  But I could see stuff going on at or near state government buildings that certify results they don't like.

In any event, the fact that we're even having this conversation is the story of this election/
You must have been really up in arms and traumatized when Al Gore actually contested an election. 

 
my biggest fear isn't 2016, it's 2020.

Trump now has a bully pulpit.  No one paid any serious attention to him in 2012.  Now, he has what...40% of the UP population ready to eat whatever BS he spoon feeds them?  

What happens if the Republicans find a decent candidate in 4 years and actually give Hillary a run?  What happens when the election is close and Trump uses the media comglomerate he will build to proclaim "rigged election"?  That's when the pitch forks come out.
I think we will find that the level of ardent support he draws will diminish bigly after he loses. However, that is largely contingent on whether or not the Republicans can get their act together in any meaningful way.

 
You must have been really up in arms and traumatized when Al Gore actually contested an election. 
If you can't see the difference between Gore contesting what was a fairly flawed recount process in one state and Trump claiming ahead of time that an entire election is rigged with zero proof of said claims, you are beyond help.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From what I saw, Trump did pretty well. He actually seemed prepared. 

But Hillary didn't stand for his BS in the slightest. She may as well have stood there with the Glengarry Glen Ross brass ball set. There's no doubt that the woman is nails.
He did well until she brought out Putin.  Then he fell apart.  When he gathered himself for a few minutes, he was able to spout off a few things that he prepared. 

Then he totally lost it with the refusal to concede comment, blaming Hillary for women complaining about him, him saying "wrong" over and over again, his body language etc.  We witnessed a total meltdown's progression.  This was his worst overall performance because of these things, the missed opportunities, and the high stakes.  As long as Dems do not stay home out of complacency, this is over. 

 
I appreciated Donald's firm grasp on what a late-term abortion is. Pretty sure ripping the baby out the day before it's due to be born is called a C-section.
I think everyone knows that Donald never thought about or cared about abortion before this race. I couldn't help but notice that Donald never brought up the classic rights vs 'conception vs life debate' which left or right is the philosophical core of every debate on this issue. This was the typical for him where he simply insulted her and showed no inner understanding of the issue or ideology underlying his position.

 
Eh I'm starting to think Trump's crappy performances in the debates and the inevitability of his loss are going to depress enthusiasm. I don't think we'll see any pitchforks or bus turnings.
You're applying rational thinking to irrational people. These are people who think Donald Trump should be president. And even beyond that bit of lunacy, remember that they're being told over and over again that the polls are a lie and that the mainstream media is conspiring against them. They don't think Trump had a crappy performance in the debates. They don't think his loss is inevitable, in fact many of them think the opposite.

How many times in the last sixteen months have we assumed that Americans would come to their senses about Trump after he's said or done something beyond the pale?  We were wrong every time. What makes us think this time will be different?

 
I think we will find that the level of ardent support he draws will diminish bigly after he loses. However, that is largely contingent on whether or not the Republicans can get their act together in any meaningful way.
I don't think so.  I think his fanbase is so rabidly anti-Hillary (and has been for decades) that they will be frothing at the mouth for anyone who calls her nasty and points out any and all missteps.  You think Obama had it tough?  You ain't seen nothing yet.  Trump is an attention whore by nature, he loves the spotlight, he will be out there as the poster-child of anti-Hillary for the next 4 years.

 
I don't think they'll actually march on Washington because they're scared of minorities, plus they'll probably run out of S'mores-flavored Schnapps before they get here.  But I could see stuff going on at or near state government buildings that certify results they don't like.

In any event, the fact that we're even having this conversation is the story of this election/
Maybe the truckers will try to stop traffic again. 

 
I don't think so.  I think his fanbase is so rabidly anti-Hillary (and has been for decades) that they will be frothing at the mouth for anyone who calls her nasty and points out any and all missteps.  You think Obama had it tough?  You ain't seen nothing yet.  Trump is an attention whore by nature, he loves the spotlight, he will be out there as the poster-child of anti-Hillary for the next 4 years.
Oh there is assuredly a large contingent of Clinton haters, but I don't think it is as large as the numbers he's getting in polls or primary results. I understand that there are nutjobs out there who will obsess on her just as they did Bill Clinton. It's why crap like InfoWars or Drudge exist. I just have a hard time seeing them as anything more than a noisy nuisance, rather than a true impediment to her being able to govern.

 
Scary note though- last night Laura Ingraham, one of Trump's fiercest supporters, tweeted that everyone must accept the results of the election, there is no other option. One of her fans tweeted back, "There is the Second Amendment option." 

 
If you can't see the difference between Gore contesting what was a fairly flawed recount process in one state and Trump claiming ahead of time that an entire election is rigged with zero proof of said claims, you are beyond help.
Lol. Trump hasn't done anything yet but drama queen Tobias is all ready to alert the national guard that riots are coming.  And gore did claim Florida was rigged. 

 
You're applying rational thinking to irrational people. These are people who think Donald Trump should be president. And even beyond that bit of lunacy, remember that they're being told over and over again that the polls are a lie and that the mainstream media is conspiring against them. They don't think Trump had a crappy performance in the debates. They don't think his loss is inevitable, in fact many of them think the opposite.

How many times in the last sixteen months have we assumed that Americans would come to their senses about Trump after he's said or done something beyond the pale?  We were wrong every time. What makes us think this time will be different?
Yeah I know what you mean but I think these are also politically either inactive or unmotivated people. These are people who scream at AM radio or are typically checked out of the electoral system. I think Trump if he believes he can rouse the rabble has a bad understanding of American rabble. We're not Eastern Europe or the Mideast wrapped up in ethnic or historical grudges.

Mostly though I think Trump is FOS and his bluff will be called. This is the point in the pool game where we tell this poseur to unfurl his wad of bills, I'm guessing it's a bunch of 1's not 100's. 

I do think there will be damage but it will be in some percentage of Americans claiming an election was 'stolen' which is never ok. Gradually this stuff is indeed corrosive.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Scary note though- last night Laura Ingraham, one of Trump's fiercest supporters, tweeted that everyone must accept the results of the election, there is no other option. One of her fans tweeted back, "There is the Second Amendment option." 
That person should be found and arrested.

 
Yeah I know what you mean but I think these are also politically either inactive or unmotivated people. These are people who scream at AM radio or are typically checked out of the electoral system. I think Trump if he believes he can rouse the rabble has a bad understanding of American rabble. We're not Eastern Europe or the Mideast wrapped up in ethnic or historical grudges.

Mostly though I think Trump is FOS and his bluff will be called. This is the point in the pool game where we tell this poseur to unfurl his wad of bills, I'm guessing it's a bunch of 1's not 100's. 

I do think there will be damage but it will be in some percentage of Americans claiming an election was 'stolen' which is never ok. Gradually this stuff is indeed corrosive.
I think you're probably right, or at least more likely to be right than wrong.  But like I said, the fact that we're even having this conversation is the story of the election.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top