This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Every single player in set 1 is worth less than the closest equivalent player in set 2.
I agree 100%. Guy who got Palmer is a Cards fan who really values C Pat in Oakland. Pretty sure he'll end up disappointed...
I don't even love the Stills side, but the other side is absolute garbage. I like Collins as a prospect but at this point the odds are stacked against him - the rest is arguably not even worth roster spots (and I play in deep leagues).
If he's a Cards fan he should realize how unimpressive Palmer was last season and how close to the end he is.
The four most valuable players are all on one side. I'd trade the whole other side for any one of the players on the Stills side, alone.
While perfectly reasonable to take the stance, this virtually ensures less trade opportunities for you later on. I'd rather keep the door open to future trades myself.
Nelson is underrated imo and I don't like Rex - but without a doubt this is lopsided. I wouldn't give Stills for the other 4 straight.
i dont either but youre getting the better rb, wr, and qb plus a TE for free on the stills side
Fournette, Cook, Davis, Williams, McCaffrey, Mixon
Yeah I got that part, thanks. I just don't see why guys like Davis, Williams, or McCaffrey are worth moving up for in Non-PPR. PPR sure, I like Davis and McCaffrey and see a big tier drop after 5.
As the Trader, the main reason I did it was because I see a big drop off after McCaffrey. I also have picks 12 and 16, and I see Kamara, Foreman, Ross, Howard, Njoku, Engram, Kupp, Juju, Henderson, Zay, Godwin, Hunt as the clear Tier 3.
Brilliant!
I'd take the 1.03 and Eifert.
I'll take my chances with the draft picks, hopefully even if I have a false sense of hope that Ingram puts me over the edge.
pretty even. If I needed a back I would go Ingram. If I was all set and could go bpa in draft I would PicksDansRams said:
No matter how low you are on Zenner, it's hard to imagine that anyone a month before the draft can be THAT confident of a tier break falling between picks 23 and 24...
Doesn't have to be a tier break, not all dynasty owners think in those terms. 23+Roster spot>24+Zenner. Heck 23 w/o roster spot might be >24+Zenner.
Zenner is barely worth a roster spot. Pick 23>24. I'd take any jump if all i had to give up was a worthless scrub.
I have Abdullah and believe Detroit will stick with the rbs and hope the revamped oline will spark the running game. We are both rebuilding and we both have lots of 1sts and 2nds, so zenner was at the end of his roster but has some value to me and maybe the riddick owner. Sure he is a committee handcuff to a bad run game, but ill take a chance and see how the depth chart plays out there.
it's not like the trade will help/hurt either of you. basically a non-event. you'll most likely get the same guy you would have picked 24 as you would have at 23. The other guy opens a roster spot to get a player he'll probably like more than Zenner anyway.
Maybe if bell's salary was such that you couldn't field any other good players. But that post is either mostly joking or the most complicated league I've seen. Love salary cap leagues but that's too much.
I get that, but the chances that moving from pick 24 to 23 makes any significant difference at all means this movement was essentially equal to cutting Zenner for a roster spot.
exactly. we're basically splitting hairs. the trade was irrelevant. nothing for nothing.
I didn't even think of that but it has to be right? Shotgun heavy/zone blocking fantasy teams? Good one!
