This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
This is one that really depends on rosters. If B is competing and needs a WR or flex Edelman is money and could be championship piece. And Andrews is easily a backup on many dynasty rosters and my guess is is not quite valued by others as much as their owners.
Can’t wrap my head around how anyone, no matter whether you’re the odds on favorite or not, would part with a 1st for Howard/Cousins.
All these trades are easy clean ups. None of them are close. Maybe the starting lineups are throwing off my thoughts. I don't play 16 team leagues.
This seems quite odd. Even last pick of the first round next year is way more valuable than these underperformers.
Is this superflex because otherwise I don’t understand the Winston trade at allTheMaddog said:
Yeah it's not bad. Maybe a small undersell, but I think Brown is worth the price of admission. He's worth the shot.ConnSKINS26 said:
i think the team getting Cousins/Howard just didn't think they could win without the depth. who knows. I got the 1st rounder. my theory here is that Kirk is older and not going to get any better. Howard is what he is at this point and already has a bunch of carries under his belt. he's only 24 but feels older already. the first rounder gives me three players in most likely the top 13 picks. that's certainly worth it to me. i need volume players i can start.Ominous Johnson said:
sometimes the better running backs aren't the ones you pin as the best. Even still, you know what you're getting in Gordon. he's 26. he's had trouble playing 16 games in a season but that also means he's not overworked thus far in his career.
He is 11th among active players for career carries. Assuming AP and Gore retire, he will move up 2 spots.
This makes no sense to me! Ingram is Top 15 RB (granted, for a "contender" his value is more, but Dynasty less) & Woods is Top 36 WRTheMaddog said:
i see him listed 15th https://www.footballdb.com/leaders/active-rushing-attempts
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/rush_att_career.htm
Its nonppr. Woods is currently wr52, not td scorer hurts in this format. Ingram, solid rb 7. Ingram alone rejected by 4 other teams for a 2020 1st.This makes no sense to me! Ingram is Top 15 RB (granted, for a "contender" his value is more, but Dynasty less) & Woods is Top 36 WR
And to only get a SINGLE 2021 Pick (1st round) in TWO FREAKING YEARS? Is this some charity deal? or was there something/player missing from this deal?
Ingram & Woods should fetch something like Golladay or DJ Moore plus some little RB like P Barber or Duke...
What am I missing here? Is my value of Ingram & Woods too high? Granted, I own both, so maybe my glasses are cloudy....
I hope it would be a high or mid 1st, maybe a little tougher to tell since it’s two years out. Ingram is a solid option it seems, but Woods.....I’m in PPR, he is currently rank 20, but most of those points are from 2 games. Only 3/7 weeks he has been in double digits (one of those was only 12). He’s a classic boom/bust guy this year. Those kind of guys are annoying to own, so I’d be happy being rid of him.This makes no sense to me! Ingram is Top 15 RB (granted, for a "contender" his value is more, but Dynasty less) & Woods is Top 36 WR
And to only get a SINGLE 2021 Pick (1st round) in TWO FREAKING YEARS? Is this some charity deal? or was there something/player missing from this deal?
Ingram & Woods should fetch something like Golladay or DJ Moore plus some little RB like P Barber or Duke...
What am I missing here? Is my value of Ingram & Woods too high? Granted, I own both, so maybe my glasses are cloudy....
I agree that he should have held. But what would he do if he waited until the trade deadline? Trade? Doesn't compute. If you're saying wait a little longer and trade closer to the deadline, then I would say ok maybe, but you can't just make trades whenever it is optimally convenient. Sometimes you have to just pull the trigger. But. A 2021 1st wouldn't do it for me either.
I think you have that backwards? Team A got fleeced. Especially the Juju deal. Team B got Juju for Derrick Henry and the Henry side send a pick too???
My thinking is that with more clarity on the leagues playoff picture and the deadline sometimes spurring an arms race between playoff teams and hopefuls, he could do better. But unless maybe he's in position for a top pick without those guys, yeah I'd hold rather than take what he got.
That's what I meant. I read it as Team B traded those guys away... but they GOT those guys. Yes, Team B did the fleecing
Some additional context here ... I’m the team that acquired Diggs. I’ll also point out that we just started the league this year using the Invisible Hand method for allocating KDS. As such, the picks are “worth more” in a vacuum, except many teams are in very similar boats, having to cut significant portions of the roster prior to the first Rookie/FA Draft. As such, I think it basically makes the picks equivalent to a normal rookie draft.
Feel like people missed the non-ppr aspect. WR’s aren’t worth anything close to equivalent RB value in those types of leagues, even potentially elite young ones.
No way. Even in non ppr, Juju is likely to be a valuable asset for the next 10ish years. Derrick Henry's value is year to year at best. Probably more like month to month or week to week.hispeedthinmint said:
