This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I totally said I’d pay that price for Higgins.You know I posted a trade about landing Higgins and got very little love. You guy would rather talk about RoJo and CEH?
It’s all about positional scarcity for me here. QBs aren’t that rare in a start-1 league. Elite / Volume RB are exceedingly rare, and getting more rare by the season.
Some people like the art of the debate. I thought you did fine in your Higgins trade but didn't move the needle enough for me to reply as I'm not as high on him as others on here. Solid move and you got the better of it but I didn't get around to replying.Oh Hot Sauce I know you responded and you rock. Everyone else I was trying to shame
Seems like some here believe so. He is decent but I will not be jocking him here my friend.Higgins is a golden god!
I believe he is on the rise. 1B to Chase’s 1A.
It’s an interesting trade. I’m not sure I can properly evaluate without mulling this one over for a spell. It’s interesting though.
Well I do think he has 2 HUGE things in his favor. One of the best pure passing QBs in the league and a stud WR in Chase that will ensure he never sees the #1 CB again. A lot to like about him IMO. But one could make the argument being the only fish in the pond (not having a stud like chase) might be better for his upside....but in this offense, I think he's golden.
He was just fine with Chase last year, and IMO they held Burrow back a little last year because of the knee.
Close one. The value is probably on the Hill side. But that swings in your favor a year or two down the line unless the 1st becomes top 3-4.
For that price, CEH side. I’d throw up in my mouth a little then smash accept. It’s a 3rd and a 4th. Pennies on the dollar.
Ruggs?smbkrypt24 said:
This league I already have Herbert, so my gamble is on flipping Watson later. This is my compete now roster so feel like I cashed out and lowered my chances to win the ship this year by a bit.Ruggs?
I don’t mind the deal - if Watson plays a full season in 2023x you dealt an oft injured RB for a potentially elite QB + a ‘23 1st. The draft is deep enough to get a potentially great WR or one of the secondary RBs. Maybe even a Stroud or Young since it’s 1-QB.
I wouldn’t say you lost the deal. Seems like a decent cash-out. It’s a gamble, and the results totally depend on Watson’s future.
Yeah, but you’ll the. be able to deal either Herbert or Watson (I’d deal Herbert for more, personally - feel like Watson’s trade value gonna be a little depressed for a couple seasons while his FF value will be high) and pick up that sweet 1st rounder.
Thanks... yes, it came down to Mixon and J Williams... figured the first to bite and it was Mixon. With contract, I can hang onto Mixon for 3 years.
I see talent there and he is young. Just not sure I see him as a fantasy WR1 that he is valued here as. I see him more as a high end WR2. Nothing wrong with that though.
This is interesting. I think a 1st and 2nd is enough for Hill and 2 1sts in a deep draft is too much for Waddle with Hill now there and not knowing if Tua is going to stick there. Overall it isn't terrible between the two and I also had both of these guys when this offseason started.
What makes me believe he can be a FF WR1 is from everything I’ve read to date, the Bengals are expected to throw more this year.
I am going to go on the other sides of things here than the people on here. Cook is too good to make this trade in a 1 QB league. With Herbert, I don't like Watson's value, especially since I expect him to be suspended at least half if not all of this year. I don't like Carter's value at all with Hall there. That 1st is good in a deep draft but is still late so bust potential is still there and the chance of getting a Cook level player is almost nil.smbkrypt24 said:
I'd have made this trade for sure. I do like Burks at 6 also. I think his offseason is being blown a little out of proportion but he seems like he could take a little longer to get up to speed with the issues he has had. I'm not a Hollywood fan at all, even in AZ, except he will have a good first 6 weeks so maybe could have got more value had you traded him in the middle of that run.
Very possible and I could be wrong. I just hate picking a team's WR2 to hold WR1 fantasy value. It is hard to do. Not impossible though. Look at Godwin/Evans when both are healthy.
My buddy asked about the first one and I told him I didn't think Carson was going to play again so told him to try and get Gus or Hunt. He asked for Hunt but couldn't get Team B to go for it but he thinks Carson has a shot to play so liked him more than Gus. Definitely fair.
You're wondering about collusion, while I'm liking what Team B received. FYI - I think Swift is overrated. It's really only Swift for Fournette/Allen. The rest is window dressing.
Team A gets nothing.
I don't know if this is bad enough to call collusion. I have seen much, much worse. Team B is getting older but I'd much rather have Allen/Lazard over Kirk/Palmer. I mean this is a Jag WR and the WR3 in LA for 2 WR1s on good offenses, with good QBs. Swift is good but he also hasn't exactly stayed on the field. Also, is Patrick really that much better than Henry if you are in need of a TE. This doesn't seem that bad at all really. If I was trying to win this year and needed a TE, I'd say what Team B got might be better.
I’m not seeing the big disparity here. In fact I’m not even sure which team you’re questioning.
I honestly ignored Carson in the first trade and saw it as Henry for 2 1sts, which is a fair enough Sell value for someone looking to rebuild, imo.
