Skeletore Eh
Footballguy
Oof. Give me decker by himself. And Dixon by himself12 team PPR
Team A gives: Kenneth Dixon, Eric Decker
Team B gives: Cameron Meredith
Oof. Give me decker by himself. And Dixon by himself12 team PPR
Team A gives: Kenneth Dixon, Eric Decker
Team B gives: Cameron Meredith
If I'd have known you value Decker this much I'd have traded him to you ilo Spicy ?Oof. Give me decker by himself. And Dixon by himself
:cstu:12 Team PPR while OTC
Gave: 1.7 (Howard)/Graham/Enunwa/3.12
Got: 1.8/Reed
Then while OTC again
Gave: 1.8 (Ross)/Dalton/3.9
Got: 1.9/Winston
Net:
Gave: 1.7/Graham/Dalton/Enunwa/3.9/3.12
Got: 1.9/Reed/Winston
What am I missing? This is terrible.Skeletore Eh said:Ppr
Dak
for
decker
torrey smith
I'll take Crowell.12 team 0.5 ppr start qb, 2rb, 2wr, rb/wr flex, te, d, k
Crowell + 3.12
for
Moncrief + 2.6
I'd take the dak side pretty easily. I don't see smith getting consistent numbers in philly and while I like decker, he has had a lot of injuries going back to his college days.Which side is Terrible?
Crowell12 team 0.5 ppr start qb, 2rb, 2wr, rb/wr flex, te, d, k
Crowell + 3.12
for
Moncrief + 2.6
Nicely done12 Team PPR while OTC
Gave: 1.7 (Howard)/Graham/Enunwa/3.12
Got: 1.8/Reed
Then while OTC again
Gave: 1.8 (Ross)/Dalton/3.9
Got: 1.9/Winston
Net:
Gave: 1.7/Graham/Dalton/Enunwa/3.9/3.12
Got: 1.9/Reed/Winston
Gotcha. I'm the one who picked up Dak in the deal. I felt great about it even without the actual need at QB. I'd picked them up at 12 and 19 round in recent dispersal. Smith was at end of my bench and was glad to pick up the roster spot as well. This league seems to really not like QBs (24 roster spots) and none of the rookies (other than Watson) were drafted or rostered through 2 waiver rounds. I've now picked up Kizer and Trubisky as well for a bid buck each.I'd take the dak side pretty easily. I don't see smith getting consistent numbers in philly and while I like decker, he has had a lot of injuries going back to his college days.
I like Dak here too but in a 24 roster league I'm surprised that you would hold 4 or more QBs.Gotcha. I'm the one who picked up Dak in the deal. I felt great about it even without the actual need at QB. I'd picked them up at 12 and 19 round in recent dispersal. Smith was at end of my bench and was glad to pick up the roster spot as well. This league seems to really not like QBs (24 roster spots) and none of the rookies (other than Watson) were drafted or rostered through 2 waiver rounds. I've now picked up Kizer and Trubisky as well for a bid buck each.
In general I wouldn't but I just see these guys as more valuable than the alternativeI like Dak here too but in a 24 roster league I'm surprised that you would hold 4 or more QBs.
I did something similar with 2.08 OTC traded that, 3.01 and 2018 3rd for 2018 1st. My team is a full teardown so should have 1.01 but likely picked up 1.02 in this trade from him. Lead pipe lock to be top 4 (had 1.01 this year), no toilet bowl involved.12 team PPR
Sent: 17 and 24 overall rookie picks
Got: 2018 first. (Projected non playoff team top 6) first overall if he wins toilet bowl
Interesting league. I'm not seeing a mid to late 2nd, a 3rd and a future 3rd being traded for future 1sts in my leagues. Especially not for high 1st round picks.I did something similar with 2.08 OTC traded that, 3.01 and 2018 3rd for 2018 1st. My team is a full teardown so should have 1.01 but likely picked up 1.02 in this trade from him. Lead pipe lock to be top 4 (had 1.01 this year), no toilet bowl involved.
Well I'm guessing he doesn't agree with me in terms of his team's outlook. It's also an IDP league so those 2nd/3rd carry a lot more value. We are in a couple of leagues together and I knew he was high on Zones, who was on the board and who he picked with 2.08 and who I would have taken had I kept it. Owner had drafted Zones at 1.15 in a different league so I'm sure was chomping at the bit to get him but wasn't going for the 2.08 for the 1st alone.Interesting league. I'm not seeing a mid to late 2nd, a 3rd and a future 3rd being traded for future 1sts in my leagues. Especially not for high 1st round picks.
Good deal for you. I moved 2.3 and 2.10 for 2018 1 (startup so hard to project).12 team PPR
Sent: 17 and 24 overall rookie picks
Got: 2018 first. (Projected non playoff team top 6) first overall if he wins toilet bowl
I got the decker side in this one. I think in a vacuum dak has more value, but it really came down to me being set at qb, thin at wr and literally unable to get anything from anybody for Dak. Couldn't even get a future second. In a 12 team 24 man roster start 1 qb league like this almost everyone has a decent qb so finding a trade partner is difficult and clogging up multiple roster spots on qbs I don't need costs me the ability to cycle through players on waivers and such. I had the opportunity to acquire a player I like at a position of need, so I took it. If decker returns to form (and all reports are that he has) he will help me compete this year. Dak wouldn't have and I fear some regression will be coming this year.Gotcha. I'm the one who picked up Dak in the deal. I felt great about it even without the actual need at QB. I'd picked them up at 12 and 19 round in recent dispersal. Smith was at end of my bench and was glad to pick up the roster spot as well. This league seems to really not like QBs (24 roster spots) and none of the rookies (other than Watson) were drafted or rostered through 2 waiver rounds. I've now picked up Kizer and Trubisky as well for a bid buck each.
You never offered him to me for a 2018 2 ? I'd have jumped on that too haha. You know now, if you didn't before, that I am a willing trade partner. Say hi to DILF for me ??I got the decker side in this one. I think in a vacuum dak has more value, but it really came down to me being set at qb, thin at wr and literally unable to get anything from anybody for Dak. Couldn't even get a future second. In a 12 team 24 man roster start 1 qb league like this almost everyone has a decent qb so finding a trade partner is difficult and clogging up multiple roster spots on qbs I don't need costs me the ability to cycle through players on waivers and such. I had the opportunity to acquire a player I like at a position of need, so I took it. If decker returns to form (and all reports are that he has) he will help me compete this year. Dak wouldn't have and I fear some regression will be coming this year.
I agree. A QB like Dak is tough to move and easy to replace in 12 man leagues. Any non-elite QB is, and I'm not buying Dak ever getting enough volume to crack that barrier. If you're contending getting a couple of shots at contributors was a good move.I got the decker side in this one. I think in a vacuum dak has more value, but it really came down to me being set at qb, thin at wr and literally unable to get anything from anybody for Dak. Couldn't even get a future second. In a 12 team 24 man roster start 1 qb league like this almost everyone has a decent qb so finding a trade partner is difficult and clogging up multiple roster spots on qbs I don't need costs me the ability to cycle through players on waivers and such. I had the opportunity to acquire a player I like at a position of need, so I took it. If decker returns to form (and all reports are that he has) he will help me compete this year. Dak wouldn't have and I fear some regression will be coming this year.
I agree non-elite QBs are easily replaceable. The difference for me is Dak may very well become elite and he has upside. He was number 8 in PPG last year well ahead of other young borderline top 5 dynasty QBs like Mariota and Winston.I agree. A QB like Dak is tough to move and easy to replace in 12 man leagues. Any non-elite QB is, and I'm not buying Dak ever getting enough volume to crack that barrier. If you're contending getting a couple of shots at contributors was a good move.
I like the Dak side of this. (Come over to the Dak side, Luke?)I agree non-elite QBs are easily replaceable. The difference for me is Dak may very well become elite and he has upside. He was number 8 in PPG last year well ahead of other young borderline top 5 dynasty QBs like Mariota and Winston.
It was a good move for him because it got him depth/WR3 he wanted and needed. For me it got me an asset that I see appreciating significantly this year.
Fwiw I also got offered diggs plus upgrade from 3.12 to 3.7 from another owner for crowell. Chose moncrief for upside and have a better plan for 2.6Crowell
I like Diggs much more than Moncrief, and would likely move Crowell for himFwiw I also got offered diggs plus upgrade from 3.12 to 3.7 from another owner for crowell. Chose moncrief for upside and have a better plan for 2.6
Yeah, I probably agree. Moncrief is a much bigger risk. He's on y4 so if he blows it this year, he could drop in value a lot. I didn't need either to start, so rolling the dice. I think 2.6 will make it worth it.I like Diggs much more than Moncrief, and would likely move Crowell for him
Yeah, I probably agree. Moncrief is a much bigger risk. He's on y4 so if he blows it this year, he could drop in value a lot. I didn't need either to start, so rolling the dice. I think 2.6 will make it worth it.
In another 12 tm ppr (nmt): 1.11 for Diggs+3.7.
1.11 is pretty cheap for DiggsYeah, I probably agree. Moncrief is a much bigger risk. He's on y4 so if he blows it this year, he could drop in value a lot. I didn't need either to start, so rolling the dice. I think 2.6 will make it worth it.
In another 12 tm ppr (nmt): 1.11 for Diggs+3.7.
I would take Perkins over 1.13 on his own but pick 18 for pick 29 is way too big a drop.16 team ppr qrwwtffkd
Team A gives 1.13 and 2.13
Team B gives 2.02 and Paul Perkins
Graham isn't worth a 1st. Especially the one from team B.16 Team 1PPR
Team A receives: 2018 1st, 2017 3.08
Team B receives: Jimmy Graham, 2018 3rd, Jaelen Strong
Not sure where the 2018 picks will fall, but the starting lineups are looking like:
Team A's lineup now: Luck, Mixon/Kamara, Hilton/Watkins/Diggs/MWilliams, Ebron, 2018 1/1/1/2/2/3
Team B's lineup now: Tyrod, Ingram/Bilal/Gio, Coleman/JRoss/Lee, Graham, 2018 2/3/3
picks side...by quite a bit.12 Team 0.5 PPR:
Gave: Dez
Got: 1.1, 2.11, 2018 2
I think Rob K. and J Williams cancel out making this look like someone is valuing Kamara as 1.6 or 1.7 instead of the late 1st he really is.12 Team PPR
Gave: Kamara, Jamaal Williams, 2018 3
Got: 2018 1/2 (mid), Cousins, Fat Rob, Brate
I value Williams more than Kelley by almost a whole Williams.I think Rob K. and J Williams cancel out making this look like someone is valuing Kamara as 1.6 or 1.7 instead of the late 1st he really is.
I don't understand trades like this at all. Someone obviously just drafted Kamara and Williams (likely 2 early 2nds), and then trades them right away for a 1st/2nd/Cousins/Fat Rob? It's clearly in favor of what you got to me. Cousins is definitely a top12 QB option that you won't find a much better one, Kamara and Williams are both worth 2nds so no point in trading a 1st away. The only way this makes sense is if it were OTC for back to back picks, and even then I don't like it.12 Team PPR
Gave: Kamara, Jamaal Williams, 2018 3
Got: 2018 1/2 (mid), Cousins, Fat Rob, Brate
My trade partner owns Ingram and Monty. I got Kamara and Williams at 1.10 and 2.6. I had 6 of first 12 and 12 of first 24 rookie picks. Have Mixon/McCaffrey/Cook still and 6 2018 1s. Trying to lock up Guice/Barkley/Chubb.I don't understand trades like this at all. Someone obviously just drafted Kamara and Williams (likely 2 early 2nds), and then trades them right away for a 1st/2nd/Cousins/Fat Rob? It's clearly in favor of what you got to me. Cousins is definitely a top12 QB option that you won't find a much better one, Kamara and Williams are both worth 2nds so no point in trading a 1st away. The only way this makes sense is if it were OTC for back to back picks, and even then I don't like it.
Maybe I'm valuing Cousins too high here but this is an easy win.
Really? That's basically Moncreif and a mid second rounder for Crowell. The 3.12 is pretty irrelevant IMO. I personally would not trade Moncreif straight up for Crowell, nonetheless throw in the 2.6.I'll take Crowell.
We disagree about 3.12.Really? That's basically Moncreif and a mid second rounder for Crowell. The 3.12 is pretty irrelevant IMO. I personally would not trade Moncreif straight up for Crowell, nonetheless throw in the 2.6.
I hear you and respect all opinions. I could see an even swap, but surprised someone had to also trade the 2.6 for the 3.12. Regardless of how you view the 3.12, there is a huge difference in those picks.We disagree about 3.12.
And I'd rather the guy to help me win a title in a thin RB market than a WR maybe, in a sea of maybes at the position. I like Moncrief just fine, but those who know know I've been on Crowell since the beginning. Now all the cards line up for what should be a top 10 finish at the position, time to double down.