Fair enough. I’m not high on Bryant, got him as a throw in mid season last year and was looking for a chance to flip him. Not the biggest Diggs fan myself, was trying to work something similar for Tyreek but that would’ve involved the 2.07 coming back instead of 1.10 and that owner was looking for more on top of that.Strongly prefer 1.4 side. I am not adding anything substantial to move from Bryant to Diggs, let alone this big of pick jump. I probably like Bryant ahead of market, and Diggs below market.
1.3 - I want to take the guy I want to take.
Not looking to change your opinions but more just a question on value. I also happen to own 1.08, 1.09, so part of my thinking was trading for the 1.10 is effectively the 1.08 (assuming I don’t trade one of the other picks), since I’ll have the board for three picks. Obviously a unique situation that doesn’t come up in every deal but just wanted to see if people saw this as a flawed way of examining value.
I was envisioning 3-4 guys I group closely together being available to me at 1.04, and I still think at least one, and likely the one I prefer most, will be available to me at 1.08 based on what I know about my league mates. If it works out that way, I’ll take the guy at 1.08 I would’ve taken at 1.04, and still get the the guys I would’ve taken at 8-9, at 9-10.