Short Corner
Footballguy
Safe and high return are kind of contradictory. Higher dividend implies higher risk.
Why I wrote this up above:Safe and high return are kind of contradictory. Higher dividend implies higher risk.
Thanks for the feedback, R&H. I made some moves yesterday...I would say PSEC, VTR, and O all held up pretty well Friday.
Full disclosure: @Sand mentioned O.audiophile said:O was not on my radar, so I researched and liked what I saw (5% yield with strong history of increasing div) so I initiated a position there - thank you!
Had never heard of PSEC and info was tougher to come by on this one during my research. While the yield is certainly eye-popping at 11%-ish, I saw that they have actually been decreasing their div payouts over the last several years. So that, combined with the general lack of data, led to me decide not to start a position. It's on my watchlist though.....![]()
During my research, a new one popped up - WPC. Currently ~ 6% yield and a solid history of increasing dividends, so I also initiated a position there.
Lastly, I also added to my HCN position, which is currently yielding right around 6% also.
As noted in the stock thread, yesterday I bottom picked a bit of KIM. Almost 8% well covered yield. The street hates REITs right now, particularly in the retail area.
I have limited knowledge on these and dipped my toe in with Kinder Morgan a few years back and got crushed. Where did I go wrong with them, were the considered safe or high risk? Was going to steer clear going forward but maybe need to keep an open mind.To at least try and start something here, I picked one of the easier ones here to look at - MLPs. Ok, maybe not so easy.
As a start, most of these are in the pipeline or fuel storage industries. There may be some outliers that do other business - I don't follow those.
These entities, like REITs, are mandated to distribute the majority of their income to unit holders (note - not shareholders). These are partnerships, of which you are a part. The structure of these can be complex, with most times there being a limited partner and a general partner. The relationship is set by the structure and can vary. Many times the GP can be the one that sees leveraged increases in distributions when things are going well. Just depends on the relationship.
You'll also see comments about how the tax structure of MLPs makes life complicated. It can (though Turbotax handles it fine). These generally issue K-1s instead of 1099s. Often there are tax breaks associated with these in taxable accounts. There is also the issue of holding these in tax deferred vehicles - they can shed UBTI (unrelated business taxable income), which, if over $1000, can trigger an IRA to have to file it's own tax forms. Yuck. Luckily you have to own a ####load, generally, to hit that threshold. To be safe, though, own these in taxable.
Also, a bit on how to evaluate these. They do tend to be looked at somewhat as a bond-like entity, so are sensitive to interest rate swings.
In short, though, these can be quite safe, high dividend vehicles. I personally own EPD and MMP and have for quite a while. These two are some of the blue chips of the space. As with all these spaces there can also be some small, high risk companies. If I were constructing a high yield income portfolio some of these would definitely be a part of it.
I would guess the excessive debt and subsequent 2015, 73% reduction in dividend is what did KMI in. I don't know what their dividend history was before that but I think you want to look for high yielders that have reasonable debt & payout ratios compared to their industry., A history of raising dividends also seems to be a huge plus. I guess the trick would be to figure out when a a dividend cut is coming and then gtho before it does.I have limited knowledge on these and dipped my toe in with Kinder Morgan a few years back and got crushed. Where did I go wrong with them, were the considered safe or high risk? Was going to steer clear going forward but maybe need to keep an open mind.