I'd never presume that an artist isn't musically talented because he or she produces EDM music. I am also curious as to how you define EDM, because if you expand into broader regions like dance-punk or modern synth-pop, there are absolutely some wildly talented artists out there.
As an old-timer, here's what bothers me - single-groove. First time i ever got kicked out of a club, it wasn't for violence or wild, drunken behavior. It was for song predicting. A white blues band was the entertainment and all their songs followed the ol' delta pattern - repeat the opening stanza line (gonna pack my bags, grab a train & ride, twice) then a rhyme (cuz my baby done lef me & it done hoit my pride). The pure lameness of this band's efforts in this vein was grinding so badly into the drunken brains of a buddy & me, that we sought lyrical relief. While they repeated their first line, Rod & me would come up with a rhyme line that made fun of them and shout it out over theirs (small room). We were soon asked to leave.
Kids for years have giggled at my instant music satires over stuff on the car radio. I'm just incredibly sensitive to and impatient with people attempting to charge me money to enjoy roteness of any kind. I guess it's why i express myself on these pages in the frenetic garble i do. If i know who will prevail in a movie fight or chase, that action is of no value to me, no matter how exciting it is.
I'd always wrote lyrics before but, at the beginning of this decade, i got an idea for a musical - my Wizard of Oz - and have written 23 songs for it. Those who've heard em are impressed, but that's still pretty flimsy standing upon which to base major assertions about song-writing. And song-writing is what it's all about - you can play your fingers off, break my heart with a single note, sail straight to the clouds with your sound, but if you aint got songs you aint got it.
What surprised the musicians who helped me with arrangements of my stuff is the amount of counterpoint in it. Well, every musical has numbers with multiple voices in them so, if you can't reconcile separate, if not disparate, themes, you got no bidness trying to write one. But the reason there's is so much of it in my work is that my 23 songs used to be about 400 songs.
I can't play an instrument passably, have no one to bounce ideas off of, have nothing but time & the patchy new skills of old mind to work with. The one talent i have is deconstruction. That's what joke writing is, that's what psych is, it's actually what playing difference-making poker is (my three lifetime professions) - the reverse engineering of situations and coming up with a model of their re-fashioned constituents which catches the eye with its novelty.
I got a DUI when i was a methhead and had to ride the bus into Reno to work for six months. There's nothing worse for a methhead than waiting and life moving slower than it's supposed to. The only thing i had to shut it out with was the tune in my head, usually the last tune i heard. Well that can drive you just as crazy as not, so i made it into a game. Whether the song was I Got the Power or Sweet Child o Mine, i would try to hum it as a country song, an r&b song, a jazz, a classical, etc etc. I'd had a tune in my head for over 50 yrs and now i could move those notes and phrases around and look at them from different angles and see this part of this and wonder if it would fit into that etc etc. Suddenly, without real musical skill, i had enough facility with the parts of music that, when the idea of a musical came along, i wasn't afraid to try.
Believe me, if i could have yadayadayadaed some of that i would have, but i want somebody to understand. The 23 songs in my musical begin with strong ideas and a solid foundation to lyrical themes. To cite the greatest, Stephen Sondheim, the world must be a different place at the end of a song than at the beginning or it shouldn't be in a musical and that's a formula i have avidly adhered to. But bridges and fanfares and vamps and and re-quotes and semi-quotes and reprises and things i dont yet know the names of, man o man o man. But it's all there, #####es. Almost broke my head, but it's all there.
I could say that's made me even more impatient with song construction, but it hasn't. I just know why i'm impatient now. My best friend, a musician who likes either jazz or str8up 'Mer'can music like the Band, van Zandt, Steve Earle, for decades has used a word of mine when he's trying to excuse a song he likes but figures i wont. "i know it's
strummy, but...." He knows a song has to be exceptional if i can hear the point-of-conception, that usually being picking up a guitar, hitting some chords and coming up with some words. It can still be great, but mostly isn't
We're owed more than that. My sister's a very unique singer, she channels some ol gutbucket roadhouse blues singer with an Oprah outlook which makes her awfulness very distinct. She does a cabaret with a few other singers 3-4 times a year and she runs songs past me (she's sung a couple of mine with decent result) and, like most singers who've watched too much American Idol, she hammers the #### out of the things. "Trust the song", i'm always saying to her "if it's in the American Songbook, the songwriter has thought an awful lot more about those notes & tones & sounds than you ever will."
Well, i can't say that about the vast majority of sounds which make airplay these days. Hard to find bridges even, nm theme & variation. I had a point when i started this but i'm 65 so i dont remember what it was so let's say that i'm proud of the 23 songs in my musical, even if they're never heard together in succession, because every note respects the old and threatens to be new BECAUSE i considered every aspect of every note and their connections to the other notes & themes in the piece. I had to do it that way because i dont have the musical talent, but i know what musical talent is and have been close (personally & musically) to some of the greatest musical talents of the rock era.
Enjoy your "all i got" bands and their tunes all you want, no matter the format. Just know that requiring more is our job as listeners as much as making more is the artist's. Two generations ago, we suffered unto a total democratization of music. Beethoven & Schubert & Wagner and Rossini surrendered to Glen Miller & Mantovani & Patti Page & the Ray Conniff Singers and the ghost of Robert Johnson was swimming in the bileless guilelessness of Pat Boone because hard-working folk didn't want to be challenged by music at the end of a hard day, they wanted to be comforted and maybe go dancing on Friday. That's what made rock & roll necessary. Think of that - i gotta go take a pill or sumn.