What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

== OFFICIAL OAKLAND RAIDERS 2018 thread == (1 Viewer)

Totally forgot we had muscle hamster. Will he outdo that game he had in Oakland his rookie season...across the whole season?
What develops through camp and preseason in our offensive backfield, and who will emerge (and into what role), is almost as intriguing to me as who is going to end up starting/being primary rotators in our D-line.

Almost. 

 
PFF discounting our team so far as well in terms of their not listing any Raider position group as the best in the NFL:

https://www.silverandblackpride.com/2018/5/21/17378354/no-raiders-position-groups-among-pro-football-focus-nfl-best-or-even-runner-ups

While it's arguably valid (I, too, would rank the Eagles and Cowboys as much better O-lines, and we have our work cut out for us facing edge guys like Bosa/Ingram and Miller/Chubb twice each this year), I still think we have the chance to have a much-bolstered O-line and D-line, and the talent to be one of the more elite groups on both sides of the ball.

Whether this talent finally translates to on-field performance under Gruden is something I can't wait to see.

 
Between Cook (pick 100 in 2016) and Hackenberg (pick 51 in 2016) you gotta figure (hope?) Gruden can make one of them marginally valuable as trade bait.

 
Interesting. Can anyone confirm that we parted ways with Kenny Hill? UDFA QB out of TCU we signed about a month ago, but was reportedly at the Eagles rookie minicamp on a try-out basis a week or two ago.

He struck me as a camp body, practice squad player at most, but I would be surprised if we signed and subsequently parted with him on such a tight time frame. The Hackenberg trade all but guarantees Hill doesn't have a future with the team, if he's even still rostered, but I'm still curious.

 
Gareon Conley full participant in OTAs.

Praise da lawd!
TESTIFY!
Conley is a giant piece of our D given potential talent and contribution -- and a giant question mark in terms of what he can do at the pro level when healthy over more than just the 2 games he has under his belt from last year.

I am still a big believer in Karl Joseph in terms of his skillset (maybe not All Pro, but love his attitude and intensity), and not so much a believer in Reggie Nelson though he was one of our better safeties last year. Behind these two are a plethora of question marks.

Obi looks like he could contribute but like Conley hasn't been healthy to show us what he's got (apologies to the Cromulons). While Melvin looks like a guy that can and has stepped up, he hasn't yet done anything as a Raider. The rest -- Erik Harris, Marcus Gilchrist, Shalom Luani, and Dallin Leavitt, are either journeyman bubble-sitters or completely unproven.

In short, Conley provides key starting material and depth that we desperately need in the defensive backfield. Here's wishing you nothing but blue skies and pain-free shins, Gar.

 
Sounds like Gruden is not please with Obi. The likely hood that he was a wasted pick is becoming more probable with each passing day. 

I still see everything the team is doing thru the narrative that Gruden is running the team like the Patriots. He is bringing in players at a discount price wherever he can to foster competition. It will be interesting to watch.

 
https://justblogbaby.com/2018/05/22/three-early-storylines-day-one-raiders-otas/

A couple of highlights from Day 1 of OTAs:

  1. Penn practicing again in walk through team-drill reps, indicating the recovery from the Linsfranc injury seems to be progressing. Giacomini was with the first team at RT, with Kolton Miller practicing with the reserves at LT. He'll likely compete with Giacomini for the starting RT spot.
  2. Maurice Hurst got all the reps he could handle, getting both first team and second team reps. The expectation is he'll move past Vanderdoes on the depth chart, shoring up the middle of the DL with Ellis.
  3. Karl Joseph/Marcus Gilchrist got first team reps on Tuesday at safety, but it sounds like everyone got playing time with everyone in our defensive backfield as they try to find the right blend. Obi Melifonwu was on the field but not 100%. It sounds like Reggie Nelson got the most reps, and per Levi Damien:
#Raiders mixing and matching safeties and where they play. One constant seems to be Reggie Nelson. He moves around but rarely leaves the field.

 
Moonshine said:
https://justblogbaby.com/2018/05/22/three-early-storylines-day-one-raiders-otas/

A couple of highlights from Day 1 of OTAs:

  1. Penn practicing again in walk through team-drill reps, indicating the recovery from the Linsfranc injury seems to be progressing. Giacomini was with the first team at RT, with Kolton Miller practicing with the reserves at LT. He'll likely compete with Giacomini for the starting RT spot.
  2. Maurice Hurst got all the reps he could handle, getting both first team and second team reps. The expectation is he'll move past Vanderdoes on the depth chart, shoring up the middle of the DL with Ellis.
  3. Karl Joseph/Marcus Gilchrist got first team reps on Tuesday at safety, but it sounds like everyone got playing time with everyone in our defensive backfield as they try to find the right blend. Obi Melifonwu was on the field but not 100%. It sounds like Reggie Nelson got the most reps, and per Levi Damien:
Good summary, thanks.

Nelson isn't my favorite, but not surprising that a 2x Pro Bowl veteran ~2 years removed from co-leading the NFL in receptions, and who seemed to be the most consistent player in our backfield last year, is going to be a constant.

Hoping the rest of the unit steps up their game. The competition may help.

 
Looks like Hurst is going to be the starting 3tech and PJ the backup 1tech to Jelly. At least that's how they rotated at this week's OTA. I'm guessing they will have PJ come in on passing downs alongside Hurst and probably on other downs as 3tech to give Hurst a breather. Plus they still have Hester who looked promising as a 3tech last year.

The Raiders have had some of the worst 3techs in the league the last umpteen years and suddenly could have the best rotation in the NFL. Other teams have better starting 3techs (for now) but the Raiders have wave after wave of guys now who can pressure up the gut. This plus Gunther is going to radically improve this D. Mark my word. This gun be fun, boys.

 
Looks like Hurst is going to be the starting 3tech and PJ the backup 1tech to Jelly. At least that's how they rotated at this week's OTA. I'm guessing they will have PJ come in on passing downs alongside Hurst and probably on other downs as 3tech to give Hurst a breather. Plus they still have Hester who looked promising as a 3tech last year.

The Raiders have had some of the worst 3techs in the league the last umpteen years and suddenly could have the best rotation in the NFL. Other teams have better starting 3techs (for now) but the Raiders have wave after wave of guys now who can pressure up the gut. This plus Gunther is going to radically improve this D. Mark my word. This gun be fun, boys.
I hope you are right

 
Looks like Hurst is going to be the starting 3tech and PJ the backup 1tech to Jelly. At least that's how they rotated at this week's OTA. I'm guessing they will have PJ come in on passing downs alongside Hurst and probably on other downs as 3tech to give Hurst a breather. Plus they still have Hester who looked promising as a 3tech last year.

The Raiders have had some of the worst 3techs in the league the last umpteen years and suddenly could have the best rotation in the NFL. Other teams have better starting 3techs (for now) but the Raiders have wave after wave of guys now who can pressure up the gut. This plus Gunther is going to radically improve this D. Mark my word. This gun be fun, boys.
I'm with ya, buddy.

What I like about the penetrating 3-tech is they can help right away. Guys that play with strength and leverage, there's a steeper learning curve.  Penetrators are as quick as they gonna be, right now. Hurst should be a problem for passing games, right now.  Good looking interior rotation. Ellis won't get many snaps. Not with Edwards, Hurst, Hester, Hall and Vanderdoes (eventually) to rotate in.

Here's some very decent fan posts on Guenther and the defensive changes:

https://www.silverandblackpride.com/2018/5/25/17392990/raiders-dc-paul-guenther-scheme-will-not-feature-pure-free-safety-enhance-karl-josephs-skillset

https://www.silverandblackpride.com/2018/1/11/16878462/what-guenthers-defense-will-look-like?_ga=2.131894604.2126276164.1527349765-1969316753.1525963495

Very little speculation, and solid stuff based on Guenther's history, and even a little Gruden video breaking down a similar defense.

 
GTFO.  

Heck ya
He's visiting the Vikings first which of course his brother plays for. From what I understand he already met with the Vikings and is visiting the Raiders next. He went to school at California and he's from Fresno. I would think he would get more playing time with the Raiders then he would with the Vikings. I'm hoping the draw of getting more playing time which if he plays well could lead to a bigger contract down the road along with the prospect of being close to home will be a bigger draw then the prospect of playing with his brother in Minnesota.

 
Waldman has a really great and insightful "contrarian" article on the Raiders' skill positions and why they may be undervalued. But what really resonated with me is how Waldman very credibly points out that, rather than having the game pass him by, Gruden knows EXACTLY what he is doing to bolster the team's strengths at the same time as he is attacking the weaknesses inherent in today's NFL defenses -- something Gruden wouldn't be doing if he truly lost sight of today's NFL game.

For example, today's Ds favor nickel fronts -- 6 in the box (4 up, 2 LBs) and an extra CB to counter today's spread 3 or 4 receiver sets. Personnel in these D's is physically much different these days as well -- lighter, quicker LBs and safeties who are built to cover a wider range. 

So what does Gruden do? Commits to leveraging the heavy battering ram we have in Lynch and sheds Olawale for a true smashmouth FB who helped lead the way for one of the leagues most prolific rushing attacks. Signs a guy like Martin who has plenty of question marks, but is in every way more of true fill-in for Lynch than scatbacks Washington or Richard could ever be. Attacking modern day lighterweight Ds in their true area of weakness.

Gruden is also best utilizing the skillset of his team -- Penn and Osemele can be nasty roadgraders, and the selection of Miller, along with Hudson and Jackson, forms a solid core all the way across the line that will allow us to get the most out of the left side while they still have the chops.

Rather than having the game leave him behind, Gruden is adeptly zigging while the league continues to zag. Waldman also points out that this is a tried and true formula -- the success of the Ravens and Seahawks over the last five years was predicated on the same dedication to churning out production in yards and attempts, in overpowering Ds through sheet volume and intent of will.

It's the part of the season where my glasses tend to be very rosy with hope and expectation. But this was a great article that backs my optimism in thinking this Raider team, if they stay healthy, execute, get the most out of their players and their overall commitment, will be much closer to their 2016 form than their 2017 debacles.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
off topic for one sec...i can keep D.Carr as an 8th rd pick in my keeper league....how many think as i do that he has his best year so far under Gruden with the WR set and TE cook at his disposal? do i keep or not? I know its the wrong forum but i value you guys input on this particular player

 
Don't, His ADP is 10th to 12th round. 15th to 18th QB taken. Keep 10? So, 3rd? 4th? round
in your draft you could take him back.

 
off topic for one sec...i can keep D.Carr as an 8th rd pick in my keeper league....how many think as i do that he has his best year so far under Gruden with the WR set and TE cook at his disposal? do i keep or not? I know its the wrong forum but i value you guys input on this particular player
What are your other options?

 
Don't, His ADP is 10th to 12th round. 15th to 18th QB taken. Keep 10? So, 3rd? 4th? round
in your draft you could take him back.
side note....QB`s are big in our league...6 pts for TD`s ...bonus points for yards and long td`s and passing completions 

i guess im interested in having a top Raider on my team lol...i never draft Raiders yet they are my favorite team

 
What are your other options?
Player

2017 Draft Position

2017 Final Rank

Current O-Rank

Drew Brees (NO - QB) Round 4, Pick 121662

JuJu Smith-Schuster (Pit - WR) -6942

Dez Bryant (Dal - WR) NA Round 1, Pick 128277

Christian McCaffrey (Car - RB) Round 2, Pick 125234

Jay Ajayi (Phi - RB) Round 11, Pick 415956

Eric Ebron (Ind - TE) Round 5, Pick 11170139

Alex Collins (Bal - RB) -10146

Michael Crabtree (Bal - WR) Round 3, Pick 129566

Leonard Fournette (Jax - RB) Round 3, Pick 14118

Mike Davis (Sea - RB) -329268

Marquise Goodwin (SF - WR) -10394

Derek Carr (Oak - QB) Round 4, Pick 725144

Rod Smith (Dal - RB) -2281858

Keelan Cole (Jax - WR) -160244

 
side note....QB`s are big in our league...6 pts for TD`s ...bonus points for yards and long td`s and passing completions 

i guess im interested in having a top Raider on my team lol...i never draft Raiders yet they are my favorite team
In 2017 D Carr had 1 away game where he threw for multiple td's(Titans 2). 2016 he had 2 away games with multiple td's
(Bucs 4, Ravens 4). If you do draft him plan on starting him for home games and pair him up with someone that mirrors
his away games.  
 

 
Waldman has a really great and insightful "contrarian" article on the Raiders' skill positions and why they may be undervalued. But what really resonated with me is how Waldman very credibly points out that, rather than having the game pass him by, Gruden knows EXACTLY what he is doing to bolster the team's strengths at the same time as he is attacking the weaknesses inherent in today's NFL defenses -- something Gruden wouldn't be doing if he truly lost sight of today's NFL game.

For example, today's Ds favor nickel fronts -- 6 in the box (4 up, 2 LBs) and an extra CB to counter today's spread 3 or 4 receiver sets. Personnel in these D's is physically much different these days as well -- lighter, quicker LBs and safeties who are built to cover a wider range. 

So what does Gruden do? Commits to leveraging the heavy battering ram we have in Lynch and sheds Olawale for a true smashmouth FB who helped lead the way for one of the leagues most prolific rushing attacks. Signs a guy like Martin who has plenty of question marks, but is in every way more of true fill-in for Lynch than scatbacks Washington or Richard could ever be. Attacking modern day lighterweight Ds in their true area of weakness.

Gruden is also best utilizing the skillset of his team -- Penn and Osemele can be nasty roadgraders, and the selection of Miller, along with Hudson and Jackson, forms a solid core all the way across the line that will allow us to get the most out of the left side while they still have the chops.

Rather than having the game leave him behind, Gruden is adeptly zigging while the league continues to zag. Waldman also points out that this is a tried and true formula -- the success of the Ravens and Seahawks over the last five years was predicated on the same dedication to churning out production in yards and attempts, in overpowering Ds through sheet volume and intent of will.

It's the part of the season where my glasses tend to be very rosy with hope and expectation. But this was a great article that backs my optimism in thinking this Raider team, if they stay healthy, execute, get the most out of their players and their overall commitment, will be much closer to their 2016 form than their 2017 debacles.  
While I admit to being concerned when Gruden was rehired for many of the reasons people have talked about, ad nauseum, since it happened, for the most part every time I look at him, read about him, listen to him etc...

...I see **** Vermeil.

 
off topic for one sec...i can keep D.Carr as an 8th rd pick in my keeper league....how many think as i do that he has his best year so far under Gruden with the WR set and TE cook at his disposal? do i keep or not? I know its the wrong forum but i value you guys input on this particular player
Please let us know what 8th round.pick means relative to other QBs.

If it was a redraft how many QBs would typically drafted by the end of the 7th round?

Otherwise I just have no frame of reference to honestly make a judgement.

In my league I'd give my left nut to keep Carr.for am 8th.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't, His ADP is 10th to 12th round. 15th to 18th QB taken. Keep 10? So, 3rd? 4th? round
in your draft you could take him back.
Don't take this the wrong way @nightmare but telling me his ADP has zero value because there is no frame of reference. What kind of league does that represent?

How many QBs are drafted before the 10th or 12th round in your example? At least I could apply that information to my league and so could @BustedKnuckles .

 
Don't take this the wrong way @nightmare but telling me his ADP has zero value because there is no frame of reference. What kind of league does that represent?

How many QBs are drafted before the 10th or 12th round in your example? At least I could apply that information to my league and so could @BustedKnuckles .
 99% of posts will be talking about 12 team leagues, 1 point per 10 yards rush/rec, 4 points for a passing TD. PPR in this 
case doesn't matter as we are talking QB's. AGAIN, 15th to 18th QB taken. The 6 points for a passing TD bumps up guys
that might throw for 30+ TD's.

ADP's will change a lot for RB's and some WR's the closer we get to week 1. It looks like D Brees will be available in his
league and I would take him over Carr as Brees's chances of throwing multiple TD's in any game is greater.
  

 
 99% of posts will be talking about 12 team leagues, 1 point per 10 yards rush/rec, 4 points for a passing TD. PPR in this 
case doesn't matter as we are talking QB's. AGAIN, 15th to 18th QB taken. The 6 points for a passing TD bumps up guys
that might throw for 30+ TD's.

ADP's will change a lot for RB's and some WR's the closer we get to week 1. It looks like D Brees will be available in his
league and I would take him over Carr as Brees's chances of throwing multiple TD's in any game is greater.
  
Sorry man but we moved along from those averages maybe two decades ago, but I'll call it 10 years to be fair. Nowhere close to 99% of leagues play by those rules, and they entirely ignore keeper and dynasty formats.

Things like PPR matter because if you generically say "10th round QB" in a PPR it ignores how many more RBs & WRs & TEs are draftable in that format (which depresses QB value even further. 

But 15th-18th QB overall makes sense across a very broad spectrum. It tells us how they are being drafted among their peer group, which acn be applied across a broad spectrum of leagues. ADP doesn't give that info.

 
If I tell you that Drew Brees has a ADP of 2.3 how does that help you? I play in a super-flex so unless you do as well it means nothing.

But if I tell you his ADP is QB 4 you have a much better idea of where he may go in l your specific league.

 
Sorry man but we moved along from those averages maybe two decades ago, but I'll call it 10 years to be fair. Nowhere close to 99% of leagues play by those rules, and they entirely ignore keeper and dynasty formats.

Things like PPR matter because if you generically say "10th round QB" in a PPR it ignores how many more RBs & WRs & TEs are draftable in that format (which depresses QB value even further. 

But 15th-18th QB overall makes sense across a very broad spectrum. It tells us how they are being drafted among their peer group, which acn be applied across a broad spectrum of leagues. ADP doesn't give that info.
Then what exactly is the "average" scoring system. This board is full of old timers who still play by that scoring system

 
Then what exactly is the "average" scoring system. This board is full of old timers who still play by that scoring system
Don't be "done" please. My intent isn't to drive you away. I am simply trying to point out that if you say Carr is going as the 8th, or 18th, QB off the board it helps more people inform their decisions than saying 10th-12th round (or 128th player drafted).

I never intended to insult you and sincerely apologise if you took it as such.  

 
Player

2017 Draft Position

2017 Final Rank

Current O-Rank

Drew Brees (NO - QB) Round 4, Pick 121662

JuJu Smith-Schuster (Pit - WR) -6942

Dez Bryant (Dal - WR) NA Round 1, Pick 128277

Christian McCaffrey (Car - RB) Round 2, Pick 125234

Jay Ajayi (Phi - RB) Round 11, Pick 415956

Eric Ebron (Ind - TE) Round 5, Pick 11170139

Alex Collins (Bal - RB) -10146

Michael Crabtree (Bal - WR) Round 3, Pick 129566

Leonard Fournette (Jax - RB) Round 3, Pick 14118

Mike Davis (Sea - RB) -329268

Marquise Goodwin (SF - WR) -10394

Derek Carr (Oak - QB) Round 4, Pick 725144

Rod Smith (Dal - RB) -2281858

Keelan Cole (Jax - WR) -160244
I like to have a Raider to root for as well, but I don't think I'd keep Carr.  Some other good options to choose from and there are a lot of good QBs.  As others have pointed out you can probably get Carr as the 15th-20th QB off the board. 

 
Don't be "done" please. My intent isn't to drive you away. I am simply trying to point out that if you say Carr is going as the 8th, or 18th, QB off the board it helps more people inform their decisions than saying 10th-12th round (or 128th player drafted).

I never intended to insult you and sincerely apologise if you took it as such.  
I believe you made this point last offseason, and it is a sound one.  Probably having the discussion in the Oakland Raiders thread is raising the antagonism level a bit.

This is worthy of its own thread, especially in June when strategy conversations seem to be dominating our board. 

Of course the best approach would be to give both "Carr went at 8.7 as the 13th QB drafted" would be best, but would require posters to do more work.  Draft position is available with one click on the draft board, while counting up positions requires more work on the part of the poster.  So you may be fighting a losing battle against apathy, but imo it's a good fight.

 
Waldman has a really great and insightful "contrarian" article on the Raiders' skill positions and why they may be undervalued. But what really resonated with me is how Waldman very credibly points out that, rather than having the game pass him by, Gruden knows EXACTLY what he is doing to bolster the team's strengths at the same time as he is attacking the weaknesses inherent in today's NFL defenses -- something Gruden wouldn't be doing if he truly lost sight of today's NFL game.

For example, today's Ds favor nickel fronts -- 6 in the box (4 up, 2 LBs) and an extra CB to counter today's spread 3 or 4 receiver sets. Personnel in these D's is physically much different these days as well -- lighter, quicker LBs and safeties who are built to cover a wider range. 

So what does Gruden do? Commits to leveraging the heavy battering ram we have in Lynch and sheds Olawale for a true smashmouth FB who helped lead the way for one of the leagues most prolific rushing attacks. Signs a guy like Martin who has plenty of question marks, but is in every way more of true fill-in for Lynch than scatbacks Washington or Richard could ever be. Attacking modern day lighterweight Ds in their true area of weakness.

Gruden is also best utilizing the skillset of his team -- Penn and Osemele can be nasty roadgraders, and the selection of Miller, along with Hudson and Jackson, forms a solid core all the way across the line that will allow us to get the most out of the left side while they still have the chops.

Rather than having the game leave him behind, Gruden is adeptly zigging while the league continues to zag. Waldman also points out that this is a tried and true formula -- the success of the Ravens and Seahawks over the last five years was predicated on the same dedication to churning out production in yards and attempts, in overpowering Ds through sheet volume and intent of will.

It's the part of the season where my glasses tend to be very rosy with hope and expectation. But this was a great article that backs my optimism in thinking this Raider team, if they stay healthy, execute, get the most out of their players and their overall commitment, will be much closer to their 2016 form than their 2017 debacles.  
I think Waldman simply looked at the team, and made an evaluation.

Whereas others saw the signing of Martin, and the drafting of Kolton and said, LOLZ, this team is done.  

Neither move will matter much this season, but that's been the narrative.  

 
I like to have a Raider to root for as well, but I don't think I'd keep Carr.  Some other good options to choose from and there are a lot of good QBs.  As others have pointed out you can probably get Carr as the 15th-20th QB off the board. 
well a lot of the top QB`s are kept by other people so those options are already off the table...then you get the guys who want a good 2nd QB and grab a guy like Carr for insurance fairly early in some cases...as wityh all drafts every league has 1 or 2 guys that grab guys way before their ADP  so things dont ''fall into place '' as you would hope

 
While I admit to being concerned when Gruden was rehired for many of the reasons people have talked about, ad nauseum, since it happened, for the most part every time I look at him, read about him, listen to him etc...

...I see **** Vermeil.
Wow, that's a fantastic analogy, never thought of it that way. Of course, Vermiel is a lot more decorated in terms of his track record -- Coach of the Year across all 4 levels of the sport (high school, junior and Div I college, NFL), brought 3 teams from losing records to playoffs. Pretty emotional guy like Gruden, wears his heart on his sleeve.

I do hope there is one important difference, though: that Gruden wins more championships. ;)

 
I think Waldman simply looked at the team, and made an evaluation.

Whereas others saw the signing of Martin, and the drafting of Kolton and said, LOLZ, this team is done.  

Neither move will matter much this season, but that's been the narrative.  
I can see Miller making more of an impact in rotation than Martin will in relief for Lynch. And I definitely think Miller has the ability to make much more of an impact long term (but you did say this season, and that's kind of stating the obvious given where both are in their careers).

But at this point in the season, you are right -- they are simply depth.

But at this point of the season, I'm always brimming with optimism -- here's hoping for much more out of both this year in their roles.

 
I can see Miller making more of an impact in rotation than Martin will in relief for Lynch. And I definitely think Miller has the ability to make much more of an impact long term (but you did say this season, and that's kind of stating the obvious given where both are in their careers).

But at this point in the season, you are right -- they are simply depth.

But at this point of the season, I'm always brimming with optimism -- here's hoping for much more out of both this year in their roles.
So do you view Miller as a project? Curious what others think of him. I haven't heard much talk about him being groomed as strictly a LT or if he's capable of winning the RT spot for the time being (since its obviously the weak spot on the Oline.) Then taking over at LT when Penn hangs 'em up.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top