Notorious T.R.E.
Showdown!™ Administrator
No. But I think we all know that if he's there when SCBF is up, he's taking him.bumpIs the Babe Adams selection official?
No. But I think we all know that if he's there when SCBF is up, he's taking him.bumpIs the Babe Adams selection official?
so he would be allowed to change his mind?No. But I think we all know that if he's there when SCBF is up, he's taking him.bumpIs the Babe Adams selection official?
I'm considering it "his list".so he would be allowed to change his mind?No. But I think we all know that if he's there when SCBF is up, he's taking him.bumpIs the Babe Adams selection official?
I was surprised. We'll see how it plays out...I take it the Nichols pick isn't popular. I'm not sure how much name dropping is allowed with the spread out years, but I think we all know the guy in question is. Oh well, I'll have to face him along with 22 of the rest of you. Good luck everyone.
If you're thinking you could pass on Ruth in the first and then still pick him up with your second rounder because SCBF has already locked in someone else assuming you were going to take him..... well this type of scenario is exactly why skipping too many picks is a bad idea.so he would be allowed to change his mind?No. But I think we all know that if he's there when SCBF is up, he's taking him.bumpIs the Babe Adams selection official?
I went back and forth. I couldn't rationalize taking a lessor player in 1897 to block the chance of someone getting a monster year. However, if it was someone else in my spot, I wish they would have done it too.I was surprised. We'll see how it plays out...I take it the Nichols pick isn't popular. I'm not sure how much name dropping is allowed with the spread out years, but I think we all know the guy in question is. Oh well, I'll have to face him along with 22 of the rest of you. Good luck everyone.
I guess I think there is a better player out there. That's what I was surprised about. Wasn't expecting Kid here.I went back and forth. I couldn't rationalize taking a lessor player in 1897 to block the chance of someone getting a monster year. However, if it was someone else in my spot, I wish they would have done it too.I was surprised. We'll see how it plays out...I take it the Nichols pick isn't popular. I'm not sure how much name dropping is allowed with the spread out years, but I think we all know the guy in question is. Oh well, I'll have to face him along with 22 of the rest of you. Good luck everyone.
Tough to turn down 452 innings though.I guess I think there is a better player out there. That's what I was surprised about. Wasn't expecting Kid here.I went back and forth. I couldn't rationalize taking a lessor player in 1897 to block the chance of someone getting a monster year. However, if it was someone else in my spot, I wish they would have done it too.I was surprised. We'll see how it plays out...I take it the Nichols pick isn't popular. I'm not sure how much name dropping is allowed with the spread out years, but I think we all know the guy in question is. Oh well, I'll have to face him along with 22 of the rest of you. Good luck everyone.
Ah, well this I can defend. Difference of opinion I guess.I guess I think there is a better player out there. That's what I was surprised about. Wasn't expecting Kid here.I went back and forth. I couldn't rationalize taking a lessor player in 1897 to block the chance of someone getting a monster year. However, if it was someone else in my spot, I wish they would have done it too.I was surprised. We'll see how it plays out...I take it the Nichols pick isn't popular. I'm not sure how much name dropping is allowed with the spread out years, but I think we all know the guy in question is. Oh well, I'll have to face him along with 22 of the rest of you. Good luck everyone.
I did as soon as I picked.anybody messege franco?
Sure.I will not be around tomorrow so can anyone take a list tonight if it does not get to me?
Send it along, Pump -- I'll be around all workday tomorrow.I will not be around tomorrow so can anyone take a list tonight if it does not get to me?
I'll be around all week...if anyone wants to ship lists.Sure.I will not be around tomorrow so can anyone take a list tonight if it does not get to me?
I struggled with mine as well.I go back and forth every 5 minutes with who Im going to take.
Round Pick Team Year Player Position1 - 1 - DD - 1999 - Pedro Martinez - SP1 - 2 - Kraft - 1951 - Stan Musial - OF1 - 3 - TU - 1905 - Christy Mathewson - SP1 - 4 - LarryBoy - 1964 - Sandy Koufax - SP1 - 5 - Norwood - 1919 - Walter Johnson - SP1 - 6 - Sammy - 1896 - Hughie Jennings - SS1 - 7 - Greco - 1942 - Ted Williams - OF1 - 8 - SNC - 2000 - Nomar Garciaparra - SS1 - 9 - MrPhoenix - 1993 - Barry Bonds - OF1 - 10 - Eephus - 1986 - Mike Scott - SP1 - 11 - DougB - 1895 - Ed Delahanty - OF1 - 12 - Avoiding Injuries - 1897 - Kid Nichols - SP1 - 13 - JFranco - 1950 - Yogi Berra - C1 - 14 - Frostillicus - 1959 - - 1 - 15 - Bogart - 1971 - - 1 - 16 - Koya - 1945 - - 1 - 17 - Texasheast - 1954 - - 1 - 18 - PIK/Pskov - 1960 - - 1 - 19 - Hoos - 1972 - - 1 - 20 - Pump - 1923 - - 1 - 21 - RNR - 1982 - - 1 - 22 - TRE - 1893 - - 1 - 23 - Spartans - 1960 - - 1 - 24 - SCBF - 1919 - - 2 - 1 - SCBF - 1894 - - 2 - 2 - Spartans - 1957 - - 2 - 3 - TRE - 1914 - - 2 - 4 - RNR - 1986 - - 2 - 5 - Pump - 1922 - - 2 - 6 - Hoos - 1996 - - 2 - 7 - PIK/Pskov - 1962 - - 2 - 8 - Texasheast - 1967 - - 2 - 9 - Koya - 1957 - - 2 - 10 - Bogart - 1958 - - 2 - 11 - Frostillicus - 1933 - - 2 - 12 - JFranco - 1966 - - 2 - 13 - Avoiding Injuries - 1984 - - 2 - 14 - DougB - 1893 - - 2 - 15 - MrPhoenix - 1964 - - 2 - 16 - Eephus - 1947 - - 2 - 17 - SNC - 1970 - - 2 - 18 - Greco - 2006 - - 2 - 19 - Sammy - 1923 - - 2 - 20 - Norwood - 1904 - - 2 - 21 - LarryBoy - 1906 - - 2 - 22 - TU - 1957 - - 2 - 23 - Kraft - 1957 - - 2 - 24 - DD - 1918 - - 3 - 1 - DD - 1935 - - 3 - 2 - Kraft - 1914 - - 3 - 3 - TU - 1895 - - 3 - 4 - LarryBoy - 1960 - - 3 - 5 - Norwood - 1944 - - 3 - 6 - Sammy - 1893 - - 3 - 7 - Greco - 1926 - - 3 - 8 - SNC - 1896 - - 3 - 9 - Eephus - 1894 - - 3 - 10 - MrPhoenix - 1961 - - 3 - 11 - DougB - 1902 - - 3 - 12 - Avoiding Injuries - 1981 - - 3 - 13 - JFranco - 1920 - - 3 - 14 - Frostillicus - 1948 - - 3 - 15 - Bogart - 1911 - - 3 - 16 - Koya - 1995 - - 3 - 17 - Texasheast - 1925 - - 3 - 18 - PIK/Pskov - 1948 - - 3 - 19 - Hoos - 1960 - - 3 - 20 - Pump - 1916 - - 3 - 21 - RNR - 1988 - - 3 - 22 - TRE - 1968 - - 3 - 23 - Spartans - 1895 - - 3 - 24 - SCBF - 1900 - - 4 - 1 - SCBF - 1917 - - 4 - 2 - Spartans - 1955 - - 4 - 3 - TRE - 2006 - - 4 - 4 - RNR - 2004 - - 4 - 5 - Pump - 1893 - - 4 - 6 - Hoos - 1916 - - 4 - 7 - PIK/Pskov - 1944 - - 4 - 8 - Texasheast - 1929 - - 4 - 9 - Koya - 1959 - - 4 - 10 - Bogart - 1972 - - 4 - 11 - Frostillicus - 1910 - - 4 - 12 - JFranco - 1936 - - 4 - 13 - Avoiding Injuries - 1908 - - 4 - 14 - DougB - 2008 - - 4 - 15 - MrPhoenix - 1997 - - 4 - 16 - Eephus - 1922 - - 4 - 17 - SNC - 1944 - - 4 - 18 - Greco - 1965 - - 4 - 19 - Sammy - 1940 - - 4 - 20 - Norwood - 1946 - - 4 - 21 - LarryBoy - 1934 - - 4 - 22 - TU - 2005 - - 4 - 23 - Kraft - 1974 - - 4 - 24 - DD - 1954 - - 5 - 1 - DD - 1975 - - 5 - 2 - Kraft - 2000 - - 5 - 3 - TU - 1934 - - 5 - 4 - LarryBoy - 1928 - - 5 - 5 - Norwood - 1991 - - 5 - 6 - Sammy - 1930 - - 5 - 7 - Greco - 1921 - - 5 - 8 - SNC - 1978 - - 5 - 9 - Eephus - 1979 - - 5 - 10 - MrPhoenix - 1909 - - 5 - 11 - DougB - 1901 - - 5 - 12 - Avoiding Injuries - 1958 - - 5 - 13 - JFranco - 1910 - - 5 - 14 - Frostillicus - 1938 - - 5 - 15 - Bogart - 1967 - - 5 - 16 - Koya - 1983 - - 5 - 17 - Texasheast - 1895 - - 5 - 18 - PIK/Pskov - 1899 - - 5 - 19 - Hoos - 1929 - - 5 - 20 - Pump - 1944 - - 5 - 21 - RNR - 1908 - - 5 - 22 - TRE - 1926 - - 5 - 23 - Spartans - 1931 - - 5 - 24 - SCBF - 1931 - -
Yeah, 1950 kinda blows... I would have picked Teddy Ballgame if he was there. I figure of all the dreck, Yogi is the closest to elite at his position.Interesting.
get it?Send it along, Pump -- I'll be around all workday tomorrow.I will not be around tomorrow so can anyone take a list tonight if it does not get to me?
Affirmative.get it?Send it along, Pump -- I'll be around all workday tomorrow.I will not be around tomorrow so can anyone take a list tonight if it does not get to me?
We would've taken him at 1.18 in 1960 but were pretty sure he'd go here. Tying up a home run hitter at SS who can also field is pretty sweet.I don't have to worry about ending up with some ####ty shortstop.
1.14 Ernie Banks, SS (1959)
Surprised me somewhat, but in the end, probably the right move.We would've taken him at 1.18 in 1960 but were pretty sure he'd go here. Tying up a home run hitter at SS who can also field is pretty sweet.I don't have to worry about ending up with some ####ty shortstop.
1.14 Ernie Banks, SS (1959)
Actually, after that Banks pick, I definitely want to do this. Need a ruling here.Something that just occured to me... would it be illegal/unethical to make deals with other drafters regarding who they pick?For example, can I offer someone a move up later in the draft if they agree not to draft Joe Blow 2008 in the first round so that I can draft Joe Blow 2007 in the second round?I actually don't think I need/want to do this right now, but the thought crossed my mind as I was weighing some of my draft options.
anyone have the bogart phone?1957what is your 2nd round year sparty?Which to me is the whole point.I actually don't have a problem with it, but maybe just to ease everyone's mind we go in order for a round or two first.any rules that takes away the draft order is gonna turn this into a giant cluster####....
Doesn't feel right.Actually, after that Banks pick, I definitely want to do this. Need a ruling here.Something that just occured to me... would it be illegal/unethical to make deals with other drafters regarding who they pick?For example, can I offer someone a move up later in the draft if they agree not to draft Joe Blow 2008 in the first round so that I can draft Joe Blow 2007 in the second round?I actually don't think I need/want to do this right now, but the thought crossed my mind as I was weighing some of my draft options.
I thought about making this offer to someone else, but it smells fishy to me. Plus what is to stop someone once the trade is consummated from picking the player in question anyway?Actually, after that Banks pick, I definitely want to do this. Need a ruling here.Something that just occured to me... would it be illegal/unethical to make deals with other drafters regarding who they pick?For example, can I offer someone a move up later in the draft if they agree not to draft Joe Blow 2008 in the first round so that I can draft Joe Blow 2007 in the second round?I actually don't think I need/want to do this right now, but the thought crossed my mind as I was weighing some of my draft options.
Well, the thing is, it would have to be officially cleared through the commissioner so people can't renege, which is why I need a ruling.I'd be making the offer to you, so if you're against it in principle, it's not happening. I would definitely make it worth your while though.I thought about making this offer to someone else, but it smells fishy to me. Plus what is to stop someone once the trade is consummated from picking the player in question anyway?Actually, after that Banks pick, I definitely want to do this. Need a ruling here.Something that just occured to me... would it be illegal/unethical to make deals with other drafters regarding who they pick?For example, can I offer someone a move up later in the draft if they agree not to draft Joe Blow 2008 in the first round so that I can draft Joe Blow 2007 in the second round?I actually don't think I need/want to do this right now, but the thought crossed my mind as I was weighing some of my draft options.
not sure i like thisWell, the thing is, it would have to be officially cleared through the commissioner so people can't renege, which is why I need a ruling.I'd be making the offer to you, so if you're against it in principle, it's not happening. I would definitely make it worth your while though.I thought about making this offer to someone else, but it smells fishy to me. Plus what is to stop someone once the trade is consummated from picking the player in question anyway?Actually, after that Banks pick, I definitely want to do this. Need a ruling here.Something that just occured to me... would it be illegal/unethical to make deals with other drafters regarding who they pick?For example, can I offer someone a move up later in the draft if they agree not to draft Joe Blow 2008 in the first round so that I can draft Joe Blow 2007 in the second round?I actually don't think I need/want to do this right now, but the thought crossed my mind as I was weighing some of my draft options.
Good by me.I'll be away on business all week and have limited internet access during the days. I have a list for each of my 4 years thay I may have to pass on to people. Greco, since you'll be around all week and our years are pretty far apart, I may just send the lists to you.
If it smells like fish...Spartans plan just seems way too scummy and convoluted to work.I vote no.
talk about cluster####not sure i like thisWell, the thing is, it would have to be officially cleared through the commissioner so people can't renege, which is why I need a ruling.I'd be making the offer to you, so if you're against it in principle, it's not happening. I would definitely make it worth your while though.I thought about making this offer to someone else, but it smells fishy to me. Plus what is to stop someone once the trade is consummated from picking the player in question anyway?Actually, after that Banks pick, I definitely want to do this. Need a ruling here.Something that just occured to me... would it be illegal/unethical to make deals with other drafters regarding who they pick?For example, can I offer someone a move up later in the draft if they agree not to draft Joe Blow 2008 in the first round so that I can draft Joe Blow 2007 in the second round?I actually don't think I need/want to do this right now, but the thought crossed my mind as I was weighing some of my draft options.
Yeah, I know, it's one of those "If you have to ask, the answer is no" type of things.Unfortunately it's really the only chance I have to field a competitive team with the rolls I got, so I had to at least ask.If it smells like fish...Spartans plan just seems way too scummy and convoluted to work.I vote no.
I don't think I'd have agreed to it anyway, so don't worry too much.Yeah, I know, it's one of those "If you have to ask, the answer is no" type of things.Unfortunately it's really the only chance I have to field a competitive team with the rolls I got, so I had to at least ask.If it smells like fish...Spartans plan just seems way too scummy and convoluted to work.I vote no.
I'm readytexas on much?
guy is goodI'm readytexas on much?
guy is goodI'm readytexas on much?
Well that's the thing... it's you not agreeing to it, taking my guy, and my team losing 115 games that worries me.I don't think I'd have agreed to it anyway, so don't worry too much.Yeah, I know, it's one of those "If you have to ask, the answer is no" type of things.Unfortunately it's really the only chance I have to field a competitive team with the rolls I got, so I had to at least ask.If it smells like fish...Spartans plan just seems way too scummy and convoluted to work.I vote no.
Well, it's only five rounds in. There are still a lot of years out there that haven't been rolled yet so we'll see. I do agree you were quite unfortunate in your first five rolls though.Well that's the thing... it's you not agreeing to it, taking my guy, and my team losing 115 games that worries me.I don't think I'd have agreed to it anyway, so don't worry too much.Yeah, I know, it's one of those "If you have to ask, the answer is no" type of things.Unfortunately it's really the only chance I have to field a competitive team with the rolls I got, so I had to at least ask.If it smells like fish...Spartans plan just seems way too scummy and convoluted to work.I vote no.