I, for one, generally agree with this.It's not black and white.Convicting Brady based on that interview is presumptuous.Well, explain all of this to my Pats fans friends who have actually watched the interview.I'm a Panthers fan and think this was a joke from the beginning. Those John Clayton quotes from Yudkin were hysterical. Always fun to see talking heads talk through both sides of their mouths and getting all up in arms with NE because it is more news. Miami doesn't matter, so who cares, kids being kids. That said, you are ridiculous in your blind hatred. Your "facts" above were your ability to read Tom Brady and determine the guilt. Comical, you know what most people have learned through all of this is that there are people out there who will believe anything including their own crazy thoughts. As the phrase goes, there is a sucker born every minute. Welcome to your minute.You guys are a riot.Oh yes, just interested in the NFL, lol. Thanks for giving them a "bit" of the benefit of the doubt. Strange that you assume their guilt based on an old interview and your own assumptions- and guilty in the end regardless of what the NFl does, just what they want. But you love the NFL?? Confusing. I thought most Patriot haters scurried like roaches when a light is turned on but a few have regrouped apparently.
APOLOGIZE to Pats fans! To Kraft, Bellichick, all the PAtriots. All you haters should be lucky enough to kneel and kiss Bill's ring!
One thing many people learned through all of this is to respect (most) Patriot fans less. Thanks for re-affirming that view.
And nobody said that was a fact. You just make stuff up.
Every one I know who saw that thinks they guy is guilty. Sorry, dont know what to tell you.
It was an awful moment for Brady.
PS He will absolutely be acquitted of this. I know, I know...you cant handle that kind of nuance. It must be black or white in your world.
Your opinion is a convenient one. You're convinced he's guilty but that he will also be acquitted. So no matter what happens you will be right in your mind.
The Pats "prepare the balls" in such a way that the PSI might drop. They've admitted as much. They also inflate them to the lowest legal PSI, since Brady has expressed that is how he likes them. It is possible that Brady knew/knows that the way the Pats prepare the balls allows them to be under the legal limit (and that the officials don't always use a gauge to check them), so when he was talking in that interview, he was "careful" with how he answered his questions. If his answers didn't ring true to someone, that person could believe he was guilty, but know that his personal belief was not going to matter, and that Brady & the Pats will not be found guilty/punished for this situation.
To me Brady's answer is tantamount to insinuating to many that he is bad as Brad Johnson was (or less; Johnson admitted to it as it relates to the SB after all). That crime is not a huge deal on a standalone basis really and many in here would agree with that. The difference to some, among some other things, is that Brady's disappointing denial is worse than the crime as far as his integrity is concerned.
In that interview Brady was given a very fair opportunity to say, "Hey, I had nothing to do with this". His answer then led me, Costas, Collinsworth, Ed Sherman, and any one else Ive seen report on it to say he has a credibility problem that pushes beyond reasonable doubt. I implore all the Patriots (and Panthers) fans and other...PLEASE, if there's a report out there that cites that interview as anything other than hurting Brady's credibility, please link it.
Last edited by a moderator:
s
). This retired ref was adamant that the pats were acting nefariously.
, I read his comments when they were made, and I didn't think he said "innocent." So, I checked, and while he basically (in his opinion) excused the Pats from any guilt, he didn't use that word.