Wearing a ribbon is nice. Letters on a helmet is nice. A little ceremony is nice. Not saying it's nothing. It's a respectful acknowledgement of the victims. But I'd be impressed if they donated the gate receipts. Or the parking. Or said anyone who buys a certain item at the game, all that money goes to the victims' families. A symbol is nice, but I'd prefer something more concrete than a symbol. Otherwise it's kind of like a politician who always wears their flag pin. It's nice. Doesn't mean a whole lot by itself, but it's nice.
It's obvious you don't know much about the Kraft family or the Pats organization if you have to even ask if they will be donating $$.

Kraft might not lead the perfect personal life, but the guy and his football team give to charity.... A lot. Of special note are his donations to children's charities like Dana Farber Institute / Jimmy Fund.
Didn't mean to imply that he definitely wasn't doing anything else. I don't know anything about his ownership style and it's great to hear that he's one of the "good ones." I just think we have such an emphasis on symbols and little gestures, and they tend to make the people doing them feel better about themselves but don't do much for the actual intended recipients. It reminds me of that character in one of the Mark Twain books who immediately broke out a tribute poen anytime someone died. It was like she couldn't wait to write the poem, and it really became about that tradition rather than providing any comfort to the family of the deceased. On Facebook, people were passing around tribute banners an hour after the events. Someone just couldn't wait to slap one together and let everyone feel good about passing it around. Just not sure what that does. I guess I'm just cynical about that stuff. I'd much rather see actual donations (which it sounds like the Krafts are likely doing) for all the things mentioned in this thread-- counseling, family expenses, etc. Not that they're required by anyone; I just think it's actually doing something, rather than pretending to do something.
IT is not pretending to do somethingWhat can anyone really do? the damage is done.all we can do is all you can do when someone close to you is grieving...you can reach out your hand, offer a shoulder to cry on, act like a human beingHere we have nfl teams/players trying to do just that. Trying to show that Tom Brady and Eli Manning feel as sick and helpless about this as a guy at the 7-11. Trying to show that the entire damn country just wants to give a hug to the community and tell them we wish we could turn back time and stop this, and you are poo-pooing it.It's called empathy, the stickers and writings are simply a way of letting the world know we grieve with this peopleit is far from pretending.
Well, that's why I said it's nice. Really, that's all it is. Sharing a Facebook banner with your friends doesn't really send a message to anyone about anything. If it makes you feel like you're a part of some process, cool. Originally, the flag lapel pin was supposed to be a sign of symbolic support. Now it's just part of a uniform. People notice it if it's not there. What does it even mean anymore?I know that I'm being a cynic instead of jumping on board and sharing a photo of a candle or something. I think a moment of silence was appropriate and I thought the President's speech was heartfelt. And I didn't mean to imply the Krafts did just that and nothing else. Sounds like they're generous, active people. But do I think little things like that are really "offering a shoulder to cry on?" Are we "giving them a hug?" Not really. I'm not saying we're doing A when we should be doing B. I agree with you that there's nothing symbolic to do when the damage is done. That's why I think it's nice, but not really more than that. Sorry if I'm explaining it poorly.