I think alot of players were ignorant and didnt know the full affects of HGH.
Most of these guys are dumb jocks. They probably just took their trainers word back in the past. Now I assume they ALL know the affects.I think alot of players were ignorant and didnt know the full affects of HGH.![]()
![]()
IMO, there is a significant difference between a player that used a banned substance to heal and one that used it as an ongoing competitive advantage. While this does not excuse anyone who used, the two are very different scenarios.If someone wants use the same brush with Pettitte as they are with Clemens or Bonds, that is their perogative, but I believe it is rather shortsighted. Context, as always, is important.Good for Andy in regard to coming forward and being honest.I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
Im really not being an apologist. Pettitte cheated and him admitting that doesnt change anything. But I honestly think theres a difference between somebody taking HGH once or twice to heal and somebody who takes a few cycles to bulk up. Of course Pettitte could be lying. Im just saying IF he is telling the truth what he did isnt as bad as what Bonds or Giambi allegedly did. You dont think there's a few levels of wrongdoing here?The Ghost of Common said:Shadyridr...point taken, but you are a known Yankees apologist. I get queasy when I see you trying to portray your as impartial and level headed.Pettite could have admitted to dealing crack cocaine to 5th graders and you would have found some way to tell us how what he did wasn't that bad.
If it's no different, why didn't he get this treatment under a doctor's orders instead of in an under-the-table, secretive transaction?I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
To an extent, I agree. At the same time, I have a hard time buying this as the complete story. If Pettite was looking to rehab with HGH, why not do it under a doctor's care?The Ghost of Common said:I respect Pettite for being a man and owning up.
Doctors dont prescribe HGH to heal injuriesIf it's no different, why didn't he get this treatment under a doctor's orders instead of in an under-the-table, secretive transaction?I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
Why is that?Doctors dont prescribe HGH to heal injuriesIf it's no different, why didn't he get this treatment under a doctor's orders instead of in an under-the-table, secretive transaction?I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
Yes. One of Mitchell's main sources is Clemens and Pettite's former trainer.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
Yeah I know that but was he specifically accused of using HGH? Anything else? I'm not a pharmacist for anything not involving street drugs.Yes. One of Mitchell's main sources is Clemens and Pettite's former trainer.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
Just HGH. McNamee claims to have injected him 2 to 4 times.Yeah I know that but was he specifically accused of using HGH? Anything else? I'm not a pharmacist for anything not involving street drugs.Yes. One of Mitchell's main sources is Clemens and Pettite's former trainer.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
Well then I agree with you first post saying this is damage control. I'll bet Clemens isn't too happy about this because the old guilty by association thing comes into play.Just HGH. McNamee claims to have injected him 2 to 4 times.Yeah I know that but was he specifically accused of using HGH? Anything else? I'm not a pharmacist for anything not involving street drugs.Yes. One of Mitchell's main sources is Clemens and Pettite's former trainer.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
Cuz Pettitte is more of a man than some others.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
I agree with this. But IMO admitting it after the fact is still better than not admitting it at allYou know what Pettite admitted to? What he was caught at.
Precisely.The research on hGH and it's efficacy in injury recovery is sketchy, at best. That's why, as shady correctly pointed out, he didn't seek it out through a doctor's consult. He used illegal means to obtain and use it, he kept it secretive until he got caught, and now this "injury recovery" shtick. I, for one, ain't buying it.You know what Pettite admitted to? What he was caught at.
He's had plenty of time to fess up between now and then, but it was only after Mitchell already told us what he did, that he fessed up.
I think it's a political move by Pettite, get out in front of the mess, take your lumps, and move on. Probably smart.
Do I believe him? Why should I?
Im not a doctor but Im assuming why would doctors prescribe a dangerous substance like HGH to heal a nonlifethreatening injury when regular work and rehab and rest can heal it instead? The risk is not worth the reward for doctors to prescribe it. Pettitte (and others) wanted to take a shortcut by taking it and I acknowledge that he cheated.Why is that?Doctors dont prescribe HGH to heal injuriesIf it's no different, why didn't he get this treatment under a doctor's orders instead of in an under-the-table, secretive transaction?I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
I think both Pettite and Clemens know that Clemens' cred is pretty much shot. I'd bet that Andy told Rocket he was going to mak this statement, and I doubt Clemens was upset. I mean, Clmens is in this up to his neck, Pettite claiming he took a few shots ain't gonna do any more damage.And I wonder how much Clemens cares what people think. My guess is he'll go the McGwire route, refuse to answer any questions, enjoy the money he made with the extra 10 years steroids bought him, raise his kids, and hope it'll blow over in time for him to get the Hall.Well then I agree with you first post saying this is damage control. I'll bet Clemens isn't too happy about this because the old guilty by association thing comes into play.Just HGH. McNamee claims to have injected him 2 to 4 times.Yeah I know that but was he specifically accused of using HGH? Anything else? I'm not a pharmacist for anything not involving street drugs.Yes. One of Mitchell's main sources is Clemens and Pettite's former trainer.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
It's just quite a bit different than taking a cortisone shot, wouldn't you say? I ain't letting him (or any of them) off the hook that easily.Im not a doctor but Im assuming why would doctors prescribe a dangerous substance like HGH to heal a nonlifethreatening injury when regular work and rehab and rest can heal it instead? The risk is not worth the reward for doctors to prescribe it. Pettitte (and others) wanted to take a shortcut by taking it and I acknowledge that he cheated.Why is that?Doctors dont prescribe HGH to heal injuriesIf it's no different, why didn't he get this treatment under a doctor's orders instead of in an under-the-table, secretive transaction?I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
Im not saying I believe Pettitte. Im just giving my responses as if he is telling the truth. Cuz if hes lying theres not much more we can do but speculate.Precisely.The research on hGH and it's efficacy in injury recovery is sketchy, at best. That's why, as shady correctly pointed out, he didn't seek it out through a doctor's consult. He used illegal means to obtain and use it, he kept it secretive until he got caught, and now this "injury recovery" shtick. I, for one, ain't buying it.You know what Pettite admitted to? What he was caught at.
He's had plenty of time to fess up between now and then, but it was only after Mitchell already told us what he did, that he fessed up.
I think it's a political move by Pettite, get out in front of the mess, take your lumps, and move on. Probably smart.
Do I believe him? Why should I?
The side effects are different but the benefit is the same. Both heal.It's just quite a bit different than taking a cortisone shot, wouldn't you say? I ain't letting him (or any of them) off the hook that easily.Im not a doctor but Im assuming why would doctors prescribe a dangerous substance like HGH to heal a nonlifethreatening injury when regular work and rehab and rest can heal it instead? The risk is not worth the reward for doctors to prescribe it. Pettitte (and others) wanted to take a shortcut by taking it and I acknowledge that he cheated.Why is that?Doctors dont prescribe HGH to heal injuriesIf it's no different, why didn't he get this treatment under a doctor's orders instead of in an under-the-table, secretive transaction?I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
That's cool. I just think there's every bit of reason to remain skeptical of his admission as there is to buy it hook-line-and-sinker.Im not saying I believe Pettitte. Im just giving my responses as if he is telling the truth. Cuz if hes lying theres not much more we can do but speculate.Precisely.The research on hGH and it's efficacy in injury recovery is sketchy, at best. That's why, as shady correctly pointed out, he didn't seek it out through a doctor's consult. He used illegal means to obtain and use it, he kept it secretive until he got caught, and now this "injury recovery" shtick. I, for one, ain't buying it.You know what Pettite admitted to? What he was caught at.
He's had plenty of time to fess up between now and then, but it was only after Mitchell already told us what he did, that he fessed up.
I think it's a political move by Pettite, get out in front of the mess, take your lumps, and move on. Probably smart.
Do I believe him? Why should I?
The literature does not support this position completely. Not yet, it doesn't.The side effects are different but the benefit is the same. Both heal.It's just quite a bit different than taking a cortisone shot, wouldn't you say? I ain't letting him (or any of them) off the hook that easily.Im not a doctor but Im assuming why would doctors prescribe a dangerous substance like HGH to heal a nonlifethreatening injury when regular work and rehab and rest can heal it instead? The risk is not worth the reward for doctors to prescribe it. Pettitte (and others) wanted to take a shortcut by taking it and I acknowledge that he cheated.Why is that?Doctors dont prescribe HGH to heal injuriesIf it's no different, why didn't he get this treatment under a doctor's orders instead of in an under-the-table, secretive transaction?I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
Well I think by the time the five years has passed we are going to get a lot more information on steroids and how many guys were using. At that point the voters will put Clemens and Bonds in on the first ballot which is what should happen. I think a lot of things have to be weighed but those two aren't Mark McGuire who was a great player, but not the best of players. Bonds' issue is his personality as much as his alleged steroid use but this stuff on Clemens and others actually helps Barry. The more alleged to have used, the more votes Bonds gets. McGuire will likely hang around for awhile on the ballot and then get in. Borderline candidates like Sheffield are ####ed.I think both Pettite and Clemens know that Clemens' cred is pretty much shot. I'd bet that Andy told Rocket he was going to mak this statement, and I doubt Clemens was upset. I mean, Clmens is in this up to his neck, Pettite claiming he took a few shots ain't gonna do any more damage.And I wonder how much Clemens cares what people think. My guess is he'll go the McGwire route, refuse to answer any questions, enjoy the money he made with the extra 10 years steroids bought him, raise his kids, and hope it'll blow over in time for him to get the Hall.Well then I agree with you first post saying this is damage control. I'll bet Clemens isn't too happy about this because the old guilty by association thing comes into play.Just HGH. McNamee claims to have injected him 2 to 4 times.Yeah I know that but was he specifically accused of using HGH? Anything else? I'm not a pharmacist for anything not involving street drugs.Yes. One of Mitchell's main sources is Clemens and Pettite's former trainer.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
There was a time when I thought Bonds would get snubbed on the first ballot as a "message" vote. I'm still not entirely sure he won't be cemented as a symbol for this era by getting passed on the first ballot. But, with the MR coming out, and more confessions coming forth, I imagine it might lessen the ire directed solely at him, and writers will just throw up their hands and get him in on the first shot.Well I think by the time the five years has passed we are going to get a lot more information on steroids and how many guys were using. At that point the voters will put Clemens and Bonds in on the first ballot which is what should happen. I think a lot of things have to be weighed but those two aren't Mark McGuire who was a great player, but not the best of players. Bonds' issue is his personality as much as his alleged steroid use but this stuff on Clemens and others actually helps Barry. The more alleged to have used, the more votes Bonds gets. McGuire will likely hang around for awhile on the ballot and then get in. Borderline candidates like Sheffield are ####ed.I think both Pettite and Clemens know that Clemens' cred is pretty much shot. I'd bet that Andy told Rocket he was going to mak this statement, and I doubt Clemens was upset. I mean, Clmens is in this up to his neck, Pettite claiming he took a few shots ain't gonna do any more damage.And I wonder how much Clemens cares what people think. My guess is he'll go the McGwire route, refuse to answer any questions, enjoy the money he made with the extra 10 years steroids bought him, raise his kids, and hope it'll blow over in time for him to get the Hall.Well then I agree with you first post saying this is damage control. I'll bet Clemens isn't too happy about this because the old guilty by association thing comes into play.Just HGH. McNamee claims to have injected him 2 to 4 times.Yeah I know that but was he specifically accused of using HGH? Anything else? I'm not a pharmacist for anything not involving street drugs.Yes. One of Mitchell's main sources is Clemens and Pettite's former trainer.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
In that conversation the interesting one is Rafael Palmeiro. He has hall of fame numbers, but saying he didn't use steroids and then getting busted a few months later is probably the worst PR nightmare of any of the players. Sosa and McGuire will get the voters who loved that magical season but Palmeiro was a guy under the radar for a good portion of his career.There was a time when I thought Bonds would get snubbed on the first ballot as a "message" vote. I'm still not entirely sure he won't be cemented as a symbol for this era by getting passed on the first ballot. But, with the MR coming out, and more confessions coming forth, I imagine it might lessen the ire directed solely at him, and writers will just throw up their hands and get him in on the first shot.Well I think by the time the five years has passed we are going to get a lot more information on steroids and how many guys were using. At that point the voters will put Clemens and Bonds in on the first ballot which is what should happen. I think a lot of things have to be weighed but those two aren't Mark McGuire who was a great player, but not the best of players. Bonds' issue is his personality as much as his alleged steroid use but this stuff on Clemens and others actually helps Barry. The more alleged to have used, the more votes Bonds gets. McGuire will likely hang around for awhile on the ballot and then get in. Borderline candidates like Sheffield are ####ed.I think both Pettite and Clemens know that Clemens' cred is pretty much shot. I'd bet that Andy told Rocket he was going to mak this statement, and I doubt Clemens was upset. I mean, Clmens is in this up to his neck, Pettite claiming he took a few shots ain't gonna do any more damage.And I wonder how much Clemens cares what people think. My guess is he'll go the McGwire route, refuse to answer any questions, enjoy the money he made with the extra 10 years steroids bought him, raise his kids, and hope it'll blow over in time for him to get the Hall.Well then I agree with you first post saying this is damage control. I'll bet Clemens isn't too happy about this because the old guilty by association thing comes into play.Just HGH. McNamee claims to have injected him 2 to 4 times.Yeah I know that but was he specifically accused of using HGH? Anything else? I'm not a pharmacist for anything not involving street drugs.Yes. One of Mitchell's main sources is Clemens and Pettite's former trainer.They can't test for HGH. Why is he admitting to this? Was that what he was accused of using in the Mitchell report?
You seriously underestimate this boat.I think what Pettitte did is very different than what Bonds and Clemens have done. I tried pot once...it was wrong, but I don't think that puts me in the same boat as someone who gets stoned to the BeJeesus Belt every night.
I agree with this and I stated in Dr D's thread that I thought the same MIGHT be the case with other players like Glaus, Matt Williams, etc. Lots of players take stuff when they are hurt. Doctors have long prescribed roids in certain cases, but they are for those specific reasons and very short-term. I don't have a problem with Pettitte. I'm glad he came clean, too. To me, it mostly exonerates him (totally from my own POV) but it also applies a lot of pressure on other players like Clemens, Tejada, etc to come clean with their stories. Our society is generally one that gives people second chances. A lot of these players missed their opportunities to be good examples of how to handle adversity. It would be very difficult and many are still playing so I know why they didn't come clean, but Giambi did.. and good for him. These guys could've helped baseball out a lot to put this behind them, come out and be honest and help the problem. Instead, we may never really know for a lot of these guys what really happened, to what extent and why.I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
Sorry. Not me.Exonerate what? That he got caught?Bob Henry said:I agree with this and I stated in Dr D's thread that I thought the same MIGHT be the case with other players like Glaus, Matt Williams, etc. Lots of players take stuff when they are hurt. Doctors have long prescribed roids in certain cases, but they are for those specific reasons and very short-term. I don't have a problem with Pettitte. I'm glad he came clean, too. To me, it mostly exonerates him (totally from my own POV) but it also applies a lot of pressure on other players like Clemens, Tejada, etc to come clean with their stories.I think alot of players took HGH to heal injuries and not for the benefit of "juicing up" and performance improvement. I think Pettitte is one of these players who took it just to heal his elbow. In their minds it was no different than taking a cortisone shot, etc.
Our society is generally one that gives people second chances. A lot of these players missed their opportunities to be good examples of how to handle adversity. It would be very difficult and many are still playing so I know why they didn't come clean, but Giambi did.. and good for him. These guys could've helped baseball out a lot to put this behind them, come out and be honest and help the problem. Instead, we may never really know for a lot of these guys what really happened, to what extent and why.
I think there is the slightest distinction, but its really all moot. If you did it, you did it, no excuses.I was initally complimentary of Pettite's coming forward, and I do at least respect the fact that he actually admitted doing SOMETHING, rather than the overpraised dancing in vagaries that Giambi did. But more or less, I agree with you. Just say you did it, the mistake thing and the semantics, you have come that far, go all the way. People are willing and want to forgive you, especially if you catch this early.I don't buy his admission because he doesn't really accept responsibility at all. He downplays every part of it and concludes with "If I made a mistake I accept responsibility". He can't even admit he made a mistake.Also, thinking through this, I don't think there can be a distinction between using hgh to heal more quickly and gaining a competitive advantage. They are the same thing. Coming back from injury faster and stronger is necessarily a competitive advantage over recovering more slowly and gradually.Lastly, my opinion of Pettitte's lame "admission" has made me second guess my conclusions about Rodney Harrison's near identical explanation/justification of his hgh use.
I agree...so lets just call Pettite and company frauds, swindlers, crooks, etc...And if you played the sport for any length of time, and were "clean", you would be calling these players cheats as well, because it is simply what they are....carry on...I hate the word cheated. It's sounds like a bunch of 13 year olds whining during a kickball game.
Like anything, there is context and there is degree. Has no one here EVER cheated in ANY way in ANY sport or game - EVER?Pettitte was injured and used a substance that, as I understand it, was not even technically banned from baseball. Was it wrong? Yes. Is it cheating? Yeah, a little I suppose. But compared with Clemens, or Bonds, or even habitual spitballers, scuffers, corkers, Pettitte is significantly LESS cheating than any of those.I agree...so lets just call Pettite and company frauds, swindlers, crooks, etc...And if you played the sport for any length of time, and were "clean", you would be calling these players cheats as well, because it is simply what they are....carry on...I hate the word cheated. It's sounds like a bunch of 13 year olds whining during a kickball game.
People are still touting this "he was injured" stuff?I dont buy it.Like anything, there is context and there is degree. Has no one here EVER cheated in ANY way in ANY sport or game - EVER?Pettitte was injured and used a substance that, as I understand it, was not even technically banned from baseball. Was it wrong? Yes. Is it cheating? Yeah, a little I suppose. But compared with Clemens, or Bonds, or even habitual spitballers, scuffers, corkers, Pettitte is significantly LESS cheating than any of those.I agree...so lets just call Pettite and company frauds, swindlers, crooks, etc...And if you played the sport for any length of time, and were "clean", you would be calling these players cheats as well, because it is simply what they are....carry on...I hate the word cheated. It's sounds like a bunch of 13 year olds whining during a kickball game.