Player Spotlight question (1 Viewer)

[-OZ-]

To include a poll with each spotlight, for the projections?

You'd have to use seperate questions for receptions, yardage and TDs, and a few more for the RB (rushes, yards, TDs plus the receiving stats).

I'll hang up and listen.

 

[Musesboy]

To include a poll with each spotlight, for the projections?You'd have to use seperate questions for receptions, yardage and TDs, and a few more for the RB (rushes, yards, TDs plus the receiving stats).I'll hang up and listen.

It's a good idea, but a bit cumbersome to have several polls for each player. How about extending the spotlights to include fantasy points (using a standard scoring method such as FBGs own)?Then you could simply run a poll using five or six fantasy point ranges to get the forum consensus. After all, FPs are the most important number we are concerned with.

 

[thayman]

To include a poll with each spotlight, for the projections?You'd have to use seperate questions for receptions, yardage and TDs, and a few more for the RB (rushes, yards, TDs plus the receiving stats).I'll hang up and listen.

It's a good idea, but a bit cumbersome to have several polls for each player. How about extending the spotlights to include fantasy points (using a standard scoring method such as FBGs own)?Then you could simply run a poll using five or six fantasy point ranges to get the forum consensus. After all, FPs are the most important number we are concerned with.

 

[-OZ-]

To include a poll with each spotlight, for the projections?You'd have to use seperate questions for receptions, yardage and TDs, and a few more for the RB (rushes, yards, TDs plus the receiving stats).I'll hang up and listen.

It's a good idea, but a bit cumbersome to have several polls for each player. How about extending the spotlights to include fantasy points (using a standard scoring method such as FBGs own)?Then you could simply run a poll using five or six fantasy point ranges to get the forum consensus. After all, FPs are the most important number we are concerned with.

True, but it isn't that cumbersome to have 3 polls per player in one thread. As you can see, you can use 4 polls. Might be difficult to include receptions, rec yards and rec TDs for RBs. Could go with rushing yardage, rec yardage, receptions and total TDs, as I have yet to see a league that gives points for rushes. Just throwing my out there.Each poll would have to be a range, and if people wanted to be specific, they can post.

 

[Ford Prefect]

I'm an American, so naturally I like to vote on things.

 

[-OZ-]

I'm an American, so naturally I like to vote on things.

In 2004 - 58.1% of 18-24 year olds did not vote. - 48% are not registered - 61% of the 18-24 year old males did not vote

 

[Ford Prefect]

I'm an American, so naturally I like to vote on things.

In 2004 - 58.1% of 18-24 year olds did not vote. - 48% are not registered - 61% of the 18-24 year old males did not vote

Nobody's perfect.

 

[Mapmaker]

True, but it isn't that cumbersome to have 3 polls per player in one thread.

As you can see, you can use 4 polls. Might be difficult to include receptions, rec yards and rec TDs for RBs.

Could go with rushing yardage, rec yardage, receptions and total TDs, as I have yet to see a league that gives points for rushes. Just throwing my out there.

Each poll would have to be a range, and if people wanted to be specific, they can post.

You've obviously never tried Tony Holm's FantasyShark Shark Leagues ... some of the best redraft league competition on the net year in year out! Link